Message ID | 20200619223947.947067-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | SHA-256 CVS and SVN patches | expand |
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote: > The patches are ordered roughly with test-only fixes, then SVN, and then > CVS. There are no additional tests here because everything fails with > SHA-256 before and passes afterwards. Thanks brian. I took a quick look at this series (including the CVS stuff) and nothing objectionable jumped out(*). Consider this series Acked-by: me (*) except perhaps some of my original code :x which I hope to fix at some point this year
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes: > I recently sent out part 2/3 of the SHA-256 work and then I realized > that I hadn't built with the CVS and SVN adapters. So this is part > 2.5/3 (or, to be pedantic, 3/4). OK. It seems that at least the early test-only parts depends only on what is already in 'master' (there are uses of "test_oid algo" and "test_oid rawsz"), but let's queue it on top of 3716d50d (remote-testgit: adapt for object-format, 2020-06-19), and merge the part 2 to 'next' soonish. Thanks.
On 2020-06-22 at 16:50:41, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes: > > > I recently sent out part 2/3 of the SHA-256 work and then I realized > > that I hadn't built with the CVS and SVN adapters. So this is part > > 2.5/3 (or, to be pedantic, 3/4). > > OK. It seems that at least the early test-only parts depends only > on what is already in 'master' (there are uses of "test_oid algo" > and "test_oid rawsz"), but let's queue it on top of 3716d50d > (remote-testgit: adapt for object-format, 2020-06-19), and merge the > part 2 to 'next' soonish. Sounds fine. I'm about to send out a v2 with Andreas's suggestion (and therefore a slightly smaller diff), but it should be a straightforward replacement. And yes, that it was based off master was intentional. There are no more test structure changes before the final series.