Message ID | 20200625153543.85039-1-tzungbi@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ASoC: rt1015: fix compilation errors and warnings | expand |
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:35:40 +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > The series fixes compilation errors and warnings discovered in the thread > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11622319/. > > The original patch: > (1) adds acpi.h for fixing implicit declaration of function 'ACPI_PTR' > (2) sorts header inclusions in alphabetical > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/3] ASoC: core: move definition of enum snd_soc_bias_level commit: 10e834099d38dd2c02bf2bd5feaa3997cfcf139f [2/3] ASoC: dapm: declare missing structure prototypes commit: 3d62ef4280a377bb2ccaee4e8f6c5093f5b8f9d4 [3/3] ASoC: rt1015: add missing header inclusion commit: 72ac4a4bef48e67bb26bc5a01d68c8163def013d All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 3:12 AM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:35:40 +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > > The series fixes compilation errors and warnings discovered in the thread > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11622319/. > > > > The original patch: > > (1) adds acpi.h for fixing implicit declaration of function 'ACPI_PTR' > > (2) sorts header inclusions in alphabetical I am wondering if it is a better practice (next time) to separate the original patch into 2 patches.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:48:41PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 3:12 AM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > > > The original patch: > > > (1) adds acpi.h for fixing implicit declaration of function 'ACPI_PTR' > > > (2) sorts header inclusions in alphabetical > I am wondering if it is a better practice (next time) to separate the > original patch into 2 patches. Yes.