[0/2] ASoC: intel: use asoc_substream_to_rtd()

Message

Kuninori Morimoto July 27, 2020, 1:07 a.m. UTC

Hi Mark

I have posted "ASoC: add asoc_substream_to_rtd() macro"
patch-set to ALSA SoC ML (= see Link), and then Pierre-Louis
wanted that Intel patch was separated for boards.

The patches which are not for Intel were already accepted.
This is for Intel, and Intel boards.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]

Kuninori Morimoto (2):
  ASoC: intel/boards: use asoc_substream_to_rtd()
  ASoC: intel: use asoc_substream_to_rtd()

 sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c     |  6 +++---
 sound/soc/intel/baytrail/sst-baytrail-pcm.c      | 16 ++++++++--------
 sound/soc/intel/boards/bdw-rt5650.c              |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/bdw-rt5677.c              |  4 ++--
 sound/soc/intel/boards/broadwell.c               |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/bxt_rt298.c               |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/byt-rt5640.c              |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcht_da7213.c           |  4 ++--
 sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c            |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5651.c            |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_max98090_ti.c     |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_nau8824.c         |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_rt5645.c          |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_rt5672.c          |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/cml_rt1011_rt5682.c       |  4 ++--
 sound/soc/intel/boards/ehl_rt5660.c              |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/glk_rt5682_max98357a.c    |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/haswell.c                 |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/kbl_da7219_max98927.c     |  8 ++++----
 sound/soc/intel/boards/kbl_rt5660.c              |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/kbl_rt5663_max98927.c     |  4 ++--
 .../intel/boards/kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927.c    |  4 ++--
 sound/soc/intel/boards/skl_nau88l25_max98357a.c  |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/skl_nau88l25_ssm4567.c    |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/skl_rt286.c               |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_da7219_max98373.c     |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_maxim_common.c        |  4 ++--
 sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_pcm512x.c             |  4 ++--
 sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_rt5682.c              |  4 ++--
 sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw_rt1308.c          |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_wm8804.c              |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/haswell/sst-haswell-pcm.c        | 12 ++++++------
 sound/soc/intel/keembay/kmb_platform.c           |  2 +-
 sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c                |  8 ++++----
 34 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown July 27, 2020, 1:56 p.m. UTC | #1

On 27 Jul 2020 10:07:49 +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> I have posted "ASoC: add asoc_substream_to_rtd() macro"
> patch-set to ALSA SoC ML (= see Link), and then Pierre-Louis
> wanted that Intel patch was separated for boards.
> 
> The patches which are not for Intel were already accepted.
> This is for Intel, and Intel boards.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] ASoC: intel/boards: use asoc_substream_to_rtd()
      commit: 2207b93bc7866e5ece41b5bad46ddfed995b2137
[2/2] ASoC: intel: use asoc_substream_to_rtd()
      commit: 2ab9a4096639337b88132529d39420576098e187

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark