Message ID | 20200706061303.246057-16-its@irrelevant.dk (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | hw/block/nvme: bump to v1.3 | expand |
On 7/6/20 8:13 AM, Klaus Jensen wrote: > From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com> > > Reject the nsid broadcast value (0xffffffff) and 0xfffffffe in the > Active Namespace ID list. > > Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com> > --- > hw/block/nvme.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c > index fc58f3d76530..af39126cd8d1 100644 > --- a/hw/block/nvme.c > +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c > @@ -992,6 +992,16 @@ static uint16_t nvme_identify_nslist(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeIdentify *c) > > trace_pci_nvme_identify_nslist(min_nsid); > > + /* > + * Both 0xffffffff (NVME_NSID_BROADCAST) and 0xfffffffe are invalid values > + * since the Active Namespace ID List should return namespaces with ids > + * *higher* than the NSID specified in the command. This is also specified > + * in the spec (NVM Express v1.3d, Section 5.15.4). > + */ > + if (min_nsid >= NVME_NSID_BROADCAST - 1) { > + return NVME_INVALID_NSID | NVME_DNR; > + } > + > list = g_malloc0(data_len); > for (i = 0; i < n->num_namespaces; i++) { > if (i < min_nsid) { > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Looks good, Reviewed-by: Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com> On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 08:13 +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote: > From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com> > > Reject the nsid broadcast value (0xffffffff) and 0xfffffffe in the > Active Namespace ID list. > > Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com> > --- > hw/block/nvme.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c > index fc58f3d76530..af39126cd8d1 100644 > --- a/hw/block/nvme.c > +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c > @@ -992,6 +992,16 @@ static uint16_t nvme_identify_nslist(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeIdentify *c) > > trace_pci_nvme_identify_nslist(min_nsid); > > + /* > + * Both 0xffffffff (NVME_NSID_BROADCAST) and 0xfffffffe are invalid values > + * since the Active Namespace ID List should return namespaces with ids > + * *higher* than the NSID specified in the command. This is also specified > + * in the spec (NVM Express v1.3d, Section 5.15.4). > + */ > + if (min_nsid >= NVME_NSID_BROADCAST - 1) { > + return NVME_INVALID_NSID | NVME_DNR; > + } > + > list = g_malloc0(data_len); > for (i = 0; i < n->num_namespaces; i++) { > if (i < min_nsid) {
On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 08:13 +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote: > From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com> > > Reject the nsid broadcast value (0xffffffff) and 0xfffffffe in the > Active Namespace ID list. > > Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com> > --- > hw/block/nvme.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c > index fc58f3d76530..af39126cd8d1 100644 > --- a/hw/block/nvme.c > +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c > @@ -992,6 +992,16 @@ static uint16_t nvme_identify_nslist(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeIdentify *c) > > trace_pci_nvme_identify_nslist(min_nsid); > > + /* > + * Both 0xffffffff (NVME_NSID_BROADCAST) and 0xfffffffe are invalid values > + * since the Active Namespace ID List should return namespaces with ids > + * *higher* than the NSID specified in the command. This is also specified > + * in the spec (NVM Express v1.3d, Section 5.15.4). > + */ > + if (min_nsid >= NVME_NSID_BROADCAST - 1) { > + return NVME_INVALID_NSID | NVME_DNR; > + } > + > list = g_malloc0(data_len); > for (i = 0; i < n->num_namespaces; i++) { > if (i < min_nsid) { Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> Best regards, Maxim Levitsky
diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c index fc58f3d76530..af39126cd8d1 100644 --- a/hw/block/nvme.c +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c @@ -992,6 +992,16 @@ static uint16_t nvme_identify_nslist(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeIdentify *c) trace_pci_nvme_identify_nslist(min_nsid); + /* + * Both 0xffffffff (NVME_NSID_BROADCAST) and 0xfffffffe are invalid values + * since the Active Namespace ID List should return namespaces with ids + * *higher* than the NSID specified in the command. This is also specified + * in the spec (NVM Express v1.3d, Section 5.15.4). + */ + if (min_nsid >= NVME_NSID_BROADCAST - 1) { + return NVME_INVALID_NSID | NVME_DNR; + } + list = g_malloc0(data_len); for (i = 0; i < n->num_namespaces; i++) { if (i < min_nsid) {