Message ID | 20200731152433.1297-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Fix Kconfig dependency issue with DMAENGINES selection | expand |
On 31-07-20, 18:24, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello, > > This small series fixes a Kconfig dependency issue with the recently > merged Xilixn DPSUB DRM/KMS driver. The fix is in patch 3/3, but > requires a separate fixes in patches 1/3 and 2/3 to avoid circular > dependencies: > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8:error: recursive dependency detected! > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8: symbol I2C is selected by FB_DDC > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:63: symbol FB_DDC depends on FB > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:12: symbol FB is selected by DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:80: symbol DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER depends on DRM_KMS_HELPER > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:74: symbol DRM_KMS_HELPER is selected by DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB depends on DMA_ENGINE > drivers/dma/Kconfig:44: symbol DMA_ENGINE depends on DMADEVICES > drivers/dma/Kconfig:6: symbol DMADEVICES is selected by SND_SOC_SH4_SIU > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:30: symbol SND_SOC_SH4_SIU is selected by SND_SIU_MIGOR > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:60: symbol SND_SIU_MIGOR depends on I2C > For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst > subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations" > > Due to the DPSUB driver being merged in v5.9, this is a candidate fix > for v5.9 as well. 1/3 and 2/3 can be merged independently, 3/3 depends > on the first two. What's the best course of action, can I merge this all > in a single tree, or should the rapidio and ASoC patches be merged > independently early in the -rc cycle, and the DRM patch later on top ? I > don't expect conflicts (especially in 2/3 and 3/3), so merging the whole > series in one go would be simpler in my opinion. Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:24:30 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > This small series fixes a Kconfig dependency issue with the recently > merged Xilixn DPSUB DRM/KMS driver. The fix is in patch 3/3, but > requires a separate fixes in patches 1/3 and 2/3 to avoid circular > dependencies: > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8:error: recursive dependency detected! > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8: symbol I2C is selected by FB_DDC > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:63: symbol FB_DDC depends on FB > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:12: symbol FB is selected by DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:80: symbol DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER depends on DRM_KMS_HELPER > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:74: symbol DRM_KMS_HELPER is selected by DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB depends on DMA_ENGINE > drivers/dma/Kconfig:44: symbol DMA_ENGINE depends on DMADEVICES > drivers/dma/Kconfig:6: symbol DMADEVICES is selected by SND_SOC_SH4_SIU > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:30: symbol SND_SOC_SH4_SIU is selected by SND_SIU_MIGOR > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:60: symbol SND_SIU_MIGOR depends on I2C > For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst > subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations" > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] ASoC: sh: Replace 'select' DMADEVICES 'with depends on' commit: 2dbf11ec7d3a63ebde946b5747ad6bd74d45adb1 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
Hi Vinod, On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:17:44PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 31-07-20, 18:24, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This small series fixes a Kconfig dependency issue with the recently > > merged Xilixn DPSUB DRM/KMS driver. The fix is in patch 3/3, but > > requires a separate fixes in patches 1/3 and 2/3 to avoid circular > > dependencies: > > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8:error: recursive dependency detected! > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8: symbol I2C is selected by FB_DDC > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:63: symbol FB_DDC depends on FB > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:12: symbol FB is selected by DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:80: symbol DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER depends on DRM_KMS_HELPER > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:74: symbol DRM_KMS_HELPER is selected by DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB > > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB depends on DMA_ENGINE > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:44: symbol DMA_ENGINE depends on DMADEVICES > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:6: symbol DMADEVICES is selected by SND_SOC_SH4_SIU > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:30: symbol SND_SOC_SH4_SIU is selected by SND_SIU_MIGOR > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:60: symbol SND_SIU_MIGOR depends on I2C > > For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst > > subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations" > > > > Due to the DPSUB driver being merged in v5.9, this is a candidate fix > > for v5.9 as well. 1/3 and 2/3 can be merged independently, 3/3 depends > > on the first two. What's the best course of action, can I merge this all > > in a single tree, or should the rapidio and ASoC patches be merged > > independently early in the -rc cycle, and the DRM patch later on top ? I > > don't expect conflicts (especially in 2/3 and 3/3), so merging the whole > > series in one go would be simpler in my opinion. > > Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Thank you. As Mark as queued the sound fix in his for-next branch for v5.9, could you queue the dmaengine fix for v5.9 too ?
On 31-07-20, 23:42, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:17:44PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 31-07-20, 18:24, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This small series fixes a Kconfig dependency issue with the recently > > > merged Xilixn DPSUB DRM/KMS driver. The fix is in patch 3/3, but > > > requires a separate fixes in patches 1/3 and 2/3 to avoid circular > > > dependencies: > > > > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8:error: recursive dependency detected! > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8: symbol I2C is selected by FB_DDC > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:63: symbol FB_DDC depends on FB > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:12: symbol FB is selected by DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:80: symbol DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER depends on DRM_KMS_HELPER > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:74: symbol DRM_KMS_HELPER is selected by DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB depends on DMA_ENGINE > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:44: symbol DMA_ENGINE depends on DMADEVICES > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:6: symbol DMADEVICES is selected by SND_SOC_SH4_SIU > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:30: symbol SND_SOC_SH4_SIU is selected by SND_SIU_MIGOR > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:60: symbol SND_SIU_MIGOR depends on I2C > > > For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst > > > subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations" > > > > > > Due to the DPSUB driver being merged in v5.9, this is a candidate fix > > > for v5.9 as well. 1/3 and 2/3 can be merged independently, 3/3 depends > > > on the first two. What's the best course of action, can I merge this all > > > in a single tree, or should the rapidio and ASoC patches be merged > > > independently early in the -rc cycle, and the DRM patch later on top ? I > > > don't expect conflicts (especially in 2/3 and 3/3), so merging the whole > > > series in one go would be simpler in my opinion. > > > > Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > > Thank you. > > As Mark as queued the sound fix in his for-next branch for v5.9, could > you queue the dmaengine fix for v5.9 too ? Dmaengine? I see three patches none of which touch dmaengine.. Did I miss something? Thanks
Hi Vinod, On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 12:14:09PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 31-07-20, 23:42, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:17:44PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > On 31-07-20, 18:24, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > This small series fixes a Kconfig dependency issue with the recently > > > > merged Xilixn DPSUB DRM/KMS driver. The fix is in patch 3/3, but > > > > requires a separate fixes in patches 1/3 and 2/3 to avoid circular > > > > dependencies: > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8:error: recursive dependency detected! > > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8: symbol I2C is selected by FB_DDC > > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:63: symbol FB_DDC depends on FB > > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:12: symbol FB is selected by DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:80: symbol DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER depends on DRM_KMS_HELPER > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:74: symbol DRM_KMS_HELPER is selected by DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB depends on DMA_ENGINE > > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:44: symbol DMA_ENGINE depends on DMADEVICES > > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:6: symbol DMADEVICES is selected by SND_SOC_SH4_SIU > > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:30: symbol SND_SOC_SH4_SIU is selected by SND_SIU_MIGOR > > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:60: symbol SND_SIU_MIGOR depends on I2C > > > > For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst > > > > subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations" > > > > > > > > Due to the DPSUB driver being merged in v5.9, this is a candidate fix > > > > for v5.9 as well. 1/3 and 2/3 can be merged independently, 3/3 depends > > > > on the first two. What's the best course of action, can I merge this all > > > > in a single tree, or should the rapidio and ASoC patches be merged > > > > independently early in the -rc cycle, and the DRM patch later on top ? I > > > > don't expect conflicts (especially in 2/3 and 3/3), so merging the whole > > > > series in one go would be simpler in my opinion. > > > > > > Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > > > > Thank you. > > > > As Mark as queued the sound fix in his for-next branch for v5.9, could > > you queue the dmaengine fix for v5.9 too ? > > Dmaengine? I see three patches none of which touch dmaengine.. > Did I miss something? I'm not sure what I was thinking... It's the rapidio patch that needs to be merged. Matt, Alexandre, can you either merge the patch as a v5.9 fix, or give me an ack to get it merged through the DRM tree ?
HI Laurent, On 12-08-20, 01:52, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 12:14:09PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 31-07-20, 23:42, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:17:44PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > On 31-07-20, 18:24, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > This small series fixes a Kconfig dependency issue with the recently > > > > > merged Xilixn DPSUB DRM/KMS driver. The fix is in patch 3/3, but > > > > > requires a separate fixes in patches 1/3 and 2/3 to avoid circular > > > > > dependencies: > > > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8:error: recursive dependency detected! > > > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8: symbol I2C is selected by FB_DDC > > > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:63: symbol FB_DDC depends on FB > > > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:12: symbol FB is selected by DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:80: symbol DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER depends on DRM_KMS_HELPER > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:74: symbol DRM_KMS_HELPER is selected by DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB depends on DMA_ENGINE > > > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:44: symbol DMA_ENGINE depends on DMADEVICES > > > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:6: symbol DMADEVICES is selected by SND_SOC_SH4_SIU > > > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:30: symbol SND_SOC_SH4_SIU is selected by SND_SIU_MIGOR > > > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:60: symbol SND_SIU_MIGOR depends on I2C > > > > > For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst > > > > > subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations" > > > > > > > > > > Due to the DPSUB driver being merged in v5.9, this is a candidate fix > > > > > for v5.9 as well. 1/3 and 2/3 can be merged independently, 3/3 depends > > > > > on the first two. What's the best course of action, can I merge this all > > > > > in a single tree, or should the rapidio and ASoC patches be merged > > > > > independently early in the -rc cycle, and the DRM patch later on top ? I > > > > > don't expect conflicts (especially in 2/3 and 3/3), so merging the whole > > > > > series in one go would be simpler in my opinion. > > > > > > > > Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > As Mark as queued the sound fix in his for-next branch for v5.9, could > > > you queue the dmaengine fix for v5.9 too ? > > > > Dmaengine? I see three patches none of which touch dmaengine.. > > Did I miss something? > > I'm not sure what I was thinking... It's the rapidio patch that needs to > be merged. No worries :) > Matt, Alexandre, can you either merge the patch as a v5.9 fix, or give > me an ack to get it merged through the DRM tree ? > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart
Matt, Alexandre, Gentle ping. As this should be fixed in v5.9, a quick reply would be really appreciated. Otherwise I'll have to bundle the rapidio fix with the DPSUB fix, and get them both merged through the DRM/KMS tree without your ack. On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 01:52:04AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 12:14:09PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 31-07-20, 23:42, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:17:44PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > On 31-07-20, 18:24, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > This small series fixes a Kconfig dependency issue with the recently > > > > > merged Xilixn DPSUB DRM/KMS driver. The fix is in patch 3/3, but > > > > > requires a separate fixes in patches 1/3 and 2/3 to avoid circular > > > > > dependencies: > > > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8:error: recursive dependency detected! > > > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8: symbol I2C is selected by FB_DDC > > > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:63: symbol FB_DDC depends on FB > > > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:12: symbol FB is selected by DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:80: symbol DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER depends on DRM_KMS_HELPER > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:74: symbol DRM_KMS_HELPER is selected by DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB depends on DMA_ENGINE > > > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:44: symbol DMA_ENGINE depends on DMADEVICES > > > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:6: symbol DMADEVICES is selected by SND_SOC_SH4_SIU > > > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:30: symbol SND_SOC_SH4_SIU is selected by SND_SIU_MIGOR > > > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:60: symbol SND_SIU_MIGOR depends on I2C > > > > > For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst > > > > > subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations" > > > > > > > > > > Due to the DPSUB driver being merged in v5.9, this is a candidate fix > > > > > for v5.9 as well. 1/3 and 2/3 can be merged independently, 3/3 depends > > > > > on the first two. What's the best course of action, can I merge this all > > > > > in a single tree, or should the rapidio and ASoC patches be merged > > > > > independently early in the -rc cycle, and the DRM patch later on top ? I > > > > > don't expect conflicts (especially in 2/3 and 3/3), so merging the whole > > > > > series in one go would be simpler in my opinion. > > > > > > > > Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > As Mark as queued the sound fix in his for-next branch for v5.9, could > > > you queue the dmaengine fix for v5.9 too ? > > > > Dmaengine? I see three patches none of which touch dmaengine.. > > Did I miss something? > > I'm not sure what I was thinking... It's the rapidio patch that needs to > be merged. > > Matt, Alexandre, can you either merge the patch as a v5.9 fix, or give > me an ack to get it merged through the DRM tree ?