Message ID | 20200817174727.15139-2-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | soundwire: fix port_ready[] dynamic allocation in | expand |
On 18-08-20, 01:47, Bard Liao wrote: > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> > > A Device may have at most 15 physical ports (DP0, DP1..DP14). > > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@linux.intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> > --- > include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h > index 76052f12c9f7..0aa4c6af7554 100644 > --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h > +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h > @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ struct sdw_slave; > #define SDW_FRAME_CTRL_BITS 48 > #define SDW_MAX_DEVICES 11 > > -#define SDW_VALID_PORT_RANGE(n) ((n) <= 14 && (n) >= 1) > +#define SDW_MAX_PORTS 15 > +#define SDW_VALID_PORT_RANGE(n) ((n) < SDW_MAX_PORTS && (n) >= 1) What is the use of this one if we are allocating all ports always, Also, I dont see it used in second patch? > > enum { > SDW_PORT_DIRN_SINK = 0, > -- > 2.17.1
> -----Original Message----- > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 2:36 PM > To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> > Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; tiwai@suse.de; > broonie@kernel.org; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; jank@cadence.com; > srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org; rander.wang@linux.intel.com; > ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com; hui.wang@canonical.com; pierre- > louis.bossart@linux.intel.com; Kale, Sanyog R <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>; Lin, > Mengdong <mengdong.lin@intel.com>; Liao, Bard <bard.liao@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] soundwire: add definition for maximum number of > ports > > On 18-08-20, 01:47, Bard Liao wrote: > > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> > > > > A Device may have at most 15 physical ports (DP0, DP1..DP14). > > > > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart > > <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> > > Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@linux.intel.com> > > Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski > > <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h > > b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index 76052f12c9f7..0aa4c6af7554 > > 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h > > +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h > > @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ struct sdw_slave; > > #define SDW_FRAME_CTRL_BITS 48 > > #define SDW_MAX_DEVICES 11 > > > > -#define SDW_VALID_PORT_RANGE(n) ((n) <= 14 && (n) >= 1) > > +#define SDW_MAX_PORTS 15 > > +#define SDW_VALID_PORT_RANGE(n) ((n) < > SDW_MAX_PORTS && (n) >= 1) > > What is the use of this one if we are allocating all ports always, Also, I dont > see it used in second patch? It is used in drivers/soundwire/stream.c and drivers/soundwire/debugfs.c. > > > > > enum { > > SDW_PORT_DIRN_SINK = 0, > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > -- > ~Vinod
On 18-08-20, 06:53, Liao, Bard wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 2:36 PM > > To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; tiwai@suse.de; > > broonie@kernel.org; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; jank@cadence.com; > > srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org; rander.wang@linux.intel.com; > > ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com; hui.wang@canonical.com; pierre- > > louis.bossart@linux.intel.com; Kale, Sanyog R <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>; Lin, > > Mengdong <mengdong.lin@intel.com>; Liao, Bard <bard.liao@intel.com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] soundwire: add definition for maximum number of > > ports > > > > On 18-08-20, 01:47, Bard Liao wrote: > > > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > A Device may have at most 15 physical ports (DP0, DP1..DP14). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart > > > <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@linux.intel.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski > > > <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> > > > --- > > > include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 3 ++- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h > > > b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index 76052f12c9f7..0aa4c6af7554 > > > 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h > > > @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ struct sdw_slave; > > > #define SDW_FRAME_CTRL_BITS 48 > > > #define SDW_MAX_DEVICES 11 > > > > > > -#define SDW_VALID_PORT_RANGE(n) ((n) <= 14 && (n) >= 1) > > > +#define SDW_MAX_PORTS 15 > > > +#define SDW_VALID_PORT_RANGE(n) ((n) < > > SDW_MAX_PORTS && (n) >= 1) > > > > What is the use of this one if we are allocating all ports always, Also, I dont > > see it used in second patch? > > It is used in drivers/soundwire/stream.c and drivers/soundwire/debugfs.c. Ah overlooked that it is modified, pls ignore this comment
diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index 76052f12c9f7..0aa4c6af7554 100644 --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ struct sdw_slave; #define SDW_FRAME_CTRL_BITS 48 #define SDW_MAX_DEVICES 11 -#define SDW_VALID_PORT_RANGE(n) ((n) <= 14 && (n) >= 1) +#define SDW_MAX_PORTS 15 +#define SDW_VALID_PORT_RANGE(n) ((n) < SDW_MAX_PORTS && (n) >= 1) enum { SDW_PORT_DIRN_SINK = 0,