Message ID | 20200923114419.71218-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | io_uring: Fix async workqueue is not canceled on some corner case | expand |
Ping guys. This is worth fixing. On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 7:44 PM Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> wrote: > > We should make sure that async workqueue is canceled on exit, but on > some corner case, we found that the async workqueue is not canceled > on exit in the linux-5.4. So we started an in-depth investigation. > Fortunately, we finally found the problem. The commit: > > 1c4404efcf2c ("io_uring: make sure async workqueue is canceled on exit") > > did not completely solve this problem. This patch series to solve this > problem completely. And there's no upstream variant of this commit, so > this patch series is just fix the linux-5.4.y stable branch. > > changelog in v2: > 1. Fix missing save the current thread files > 2. Fix double list add in io_queue_async_work() > > Muchun Song (4): > io_uring: Fix missing smp_mb() in io_cancel_async_work() > io_uring: Fix remove irrelevant req from the task_list > io_uring: Fix missing save the current thread files > io_uring: Fix double list add in io_queue_async_work() > > Yinyin Zhu (1): > io_uring: Fix resource leaking when kill the process > > fs/io_uring.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.11.0 >
On 9/28/20 6:50 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> Ping guys. This is worth fixing.
Agree - can you respin with the suggested change?
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:26 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote: > > On 9/28/20 6:50 AM, Muchun Song wrote: > > Ping guys. This is worth fixing. > > Agree - can you respin with the suggested change? OK, will do. > > -- > Jens Axboe >