Message ID | 160319106331.15822.2945713836148003890.stgit@toke.dk (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | bpf: Rework bpf_redirect_neigh() to allow supplying nexthop from caller | expand |
On 10/20/20 4:51 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> > > The bpf_fib_lookup() helper performs a neighbour lookup for the destination > IP and returns BPF_FIB_LKUP_NO_NEIGH if this fails, with the expectation > that the BPF program will deal with this condition, either by passing the > packet up the stack, or by using bpf_redirect_neigh(). > > The neighbour lookup is done via a hash table (through ___neigh_lookup_noref()), > which incurs some overhead. If the caller knows this is likely to fail > anyway, it may want to skip that and go unconditionally to > bpf_redirect_neigh(). For this use case, add a flag to bpf_fib_lookup() > that will make it skip the neighbour lookup and instead always return > BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_NEIGH (but still populate the gateway and target > ifindex). > > Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> > --- > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 ++++++---- > net/core/filter.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- > tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 ++++++---- > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Nack. Please don't. As I mentioned in my reply to Daniel, I would prefer such logic be pushed to the bpf programs. There is no reason for rare run time events to warrant a new flag and new check in the existing FIB helpers. The bpf programs can take the hit of the extra lookup.
On 10/20/20 3:49 PM, David Ahern wrote: > On 10/20/20 4:51 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> >> >> The bpf_fib_lookup() helper performs a neighbour lookup for the destination >> IP and returns BPF_FIB_LKUP_NO_NEIGH if this fails, with the expectation >> that the BPF program will deal with this condition, either by passing the >> packet up the stack, or by using bpf_redirect_neigh(). >> >> The neighbour lookup is done via a hash table (through ___neigh_lookup_noref()), >> which incurs some overhead. If the caller knows this is likely to fail >> anyway, it may want to skip that and go unconditionally to >> bpf_redirect_neigh(). For this use case, add a flag to bpf_fib_lookup() >> that will make it skip the neighbour lookup and instead always return >> BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_NEIGH (but still populate the gateway and target >> ifindex). >> >> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> >> --- >> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 ++++++---- >> net/core/filter.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- >> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 ++++++---- >> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > Nack. Please don't. > > As I mentioned in my reply to Daniel, I would prefer such logic be > pushed to the bpf programs. There is no reason for rare run time events > to warrant a new flag and new check in the existing FIB helpers. The bpf > programs can take the hit of the extra lookup. Fair enough, lets push it to progs then.
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> writes: > On 10/20/20 3:49 PM, David Ahern wrote: >> On 10/20/20 4:51 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >>> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> >>> >>> The bpf_fib_lookup() helper performs a neighbour lookup for the destination >>> IP and returns BPF_FIB_LKUP_NO_NEIGH if this fails, with the expectation >>> that the BPF program will deal with this condition, either by passing the >>> packet up the stack, or by using bpf_redirect_neigh(). >>> >>> The neighbour lookup is done via a hash table (through ___neigh_lookup_noref()), >>> which incurs some overhead. If the caller knows this is likely to fail >>> anyway, it may want to skip that and go unconditionally to >>> bpf_redirect_neigh(). For this use case, add a flag to bpf_fib_lookup() >>> that will make it skip the neighbour lookup and instead always return >>> BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_NEIGH (but still populate the gateway and target >>> ifindex). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 ++++++---- >>> net/core/filter.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- >>> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 ++++++---- >>> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> Nack. Please don't. >> >> As I mentioned in my reply to Daniel, I would prefer such logic be >> pushed to the bpf programs. There is no reason for rare run time events >> to warrant a new flag and new check in the existing FIB helpers. The bpf >> programs can take the hit of the extra lookup. > > Fair enough, lets push it to progs then. OK, with this and the other comments, this goes back to v1 + the compilation fix. Will send that as v3... -Toke
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 9668cde9d684..4bfd3c72dae6 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -4841,12 +4841,14 @@ struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args { __u64 args[0]; }; -/* DIRECT: Skip the FIB rules and go to FIB table associated with device - * OUTPUT: Do lookup from egress perspective; default is ingress +/* DIRECT: Skip the FIB rules and go to FIB table associated with device + * OUTPUT: Do lookup from egress perspective; default is ingress + * SKIP_NEIGH: Skip neighbour lookup and return BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_NEIGH on success */ enum { - BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT = (1U << 0), - BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT = (1U << 1), + BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT = (1U << 0), + BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT = (1U << 1), + BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_SKIP_NEIGH = (1U << 2), }; enum { diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index fa09b4f141ae..9791e6311afa 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -5382,6 +5382,9 @@ static int bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_fib_lookup *params, if (nhc->nhc_gw_family) params->ipv4_dst = nhc->nhc_gw.ipv4; + if (flags & BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_SKIP_NEIGH) + return BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_NEIGH; + neigh = __ipv4_neigh_lookup_noref(dev, (__force u32)params->ipv4_dst); } else { @@ -5389,6 +5392,10 @@ static int bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_fib_lookup *params, params->family = AF_INET6; *dst = nhc->nhc_gw.ipv6; + + if (flags & BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_SKIP_NEIGH) + return BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_NEIGH; + neigh = __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref_stub(dev, dst); } @@ -5501,6 +5508,9 @@ static int bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_fib_lookup *params, params->rt_metric = res.f6i->fib6_metric; params->ifindex = dev->ifindex; + if (flags & BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_SKIP_NEIGH) + return BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_NEIGH; + /* xdp and cls_bpf programs are run in RCU-bh so rcu_read_lock_bh is * not needed here. */ @@ -5518,7 +5528,8 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_xdp_fib_lookup, struct xdp_buff *, ctx, if (plen < sizeof(*params)) return -EINVAL; - if (flags & ~(BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT | BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT)) + if (flags & ~(BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT | BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT | + BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_SKIP_NEIGH)) return -EINVAL; switch (params->family) { @@ -5555,7 +5566,8 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_skb_fib_lookup, struct sk_buff *, skb, if (plen < sizeof(*params)) return -EINVAL; - if (flags & ~(BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT | BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT)) + if (flags & ~(BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT | BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT | + BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_SKIP_NEIGH)) return -EINVAL; switch (params->family) { diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 9668cde9d684..4bfd3c72dae6 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -4841,12 +4841,14 @@ struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args { __u64 args[0]; }; -/* DIRECT: Skip the FIB rules and go to FIB table associated with device - * OUTPUT: Do lookup from egress perspective; default is ingress +/* DIRECT: Skip the FIB rules and go to FIB table associated with device + * OUTPUT: Do lookup from egress perspective; default is ingress + * SKIP_NEIGH: Skip neighbour lookup and return BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_NEIGH on success */ enum { - BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT = (1U << 0), - BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT = (1U << 1), + BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT = (1U << 0), + BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT = (1U << 1), + BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_SKIP_NEIGH = (1U << 2), }; enum {