| Message ID | 20201104092328.659169-1-jonathanh@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [V2] drm/tegra: sor: Don't warn on probe deferral | expand |
04.11.2020 12:23, Jon Hunter пишет: > Deferred probe is an expected return value for tegra_output_probe(). > Given that the driver deals with it properly, there's no need to output > a warning that may potentially confuse users. > > Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> > --- > > Changes since V1: > - This time, I actually validated it! > > drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c | 7 +++---- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c > index e88a17c2937f..898a80ca37fa 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c > @@ -3764,10 +3764,9 @@ static int tegra_sor_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return err; > > err = tegra_output_probe(&sor->output); > - if (err < 0) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to probe output: %d\n", err); > - return err; > - } > + if (err < 0) > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, err, > + "failed to probe output: %d\n", err); Hello Jon, There is no need to duplicate the error code in the message [1]. Perhaps worth making a v3? :) [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.10-rc2/source/drivers/base/core.c#L4240
On 04/11/2020 10:49, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 04.11.2020 12:23, Jon Hunter пишет: >> Deferred probe is an expected return value for tegra_output_probe(). >> Given that the driver deals with it properly, there's no need to output >> a warning that may potentially confuse users. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> >> --- >> >> Changes since V1: >> - This time, I actually validated it! >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c | 7 +++---- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c >> index e88a17c2937f..898a80ca37fa 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c >> @@ -3764,10 +3764,9 @@ static int tegra_sor_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> return err; >> >> err = tegra_output_probe(&sor->output); >> - if (err < 0) { >> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to probe output: %d\n", err); >> - return err; >> - } >> + if (err < 0) >> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, err, >> + "failed to probe output: %d\n", err); > > Hello Jon, > > There is no need to duplicate the error code in the message [1]. Perhaps > worth making a v3? :) Indeed! Thanks for catching. Trying to do to many things at the same time. I should have learned by now! Jon
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c index e88a17c2937f..898a80ca37fa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c @@ -3764,10 +3764,9 @@ static int tegra_sor_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return err; err = tegra_output_probe(&sor->output); - if (err < 0) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to probe output: %d\n", err); - return err; - } + if (err < 0) + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, err, + "failed to probe output: %d\n", err); if (sor->ops && sor->ops->probe) { err = sor->ops->probe(sor);
Deferred probe is an expected return value for tegra_output_probe(). Given that the driver deals with it properly, there's no need to output a warning that may potentially confuse users. Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> --- Changes since V1: - This time, I actually validated it! drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)