diff mbox series

[1/2] gc docs: change --keep-base-pack to --keep-largest-pack

Message ID 20201120115522.23617-1-avarab@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit db5368b846ac4c21f8d3bbc8e63c9b8d38ff19ff
Headers show
Series [1/2] gc docs: change --keep-base-pack to --keep-largest-pack | expand

Commit Message

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason Nov. 20, 2020, 11:55 a.m. UTC
The --keep-base-pack option never existed in git.git. It was the name
for the --keep-largest-pack option in earlier revisions of that series
before it landed as ae4e89e549 ("gc: add --keep-largest-pack option",
2018-04-15).

The later patches in that series[1][2] weren't changed to also refer
to --keep-largest-pack, so we've had this reference to a nonexisting
option ever since the feature initially landed.

1. 55dfe13df9 ("gc: add gc.bigPackThreshold config", 2018-04-15)

2. 9806f5a7bf ("gc --auto: exclude base pack if not enough mem to
   "repack -ad"", 2018-04-15)

Reported-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/config/gc.txt | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Junio C Hamano Nov. 21, 2020, 7:43 p.m. UTC | #1
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@gmail.com> writes:

> The --keep-base-pack option never existed in git.git. It was the name
> for the --keep-largest-pack option in earlier revisions of that series
> before it landed as ae4e89e549 ("gc: add --keep-largest-pack option",
> 2018-04-15).

Is it a sign that this hasn't been used by or useful to our users
that this documentation bug did not get noticed by anybody for the
past 30 months, I wonder.

"git gc -h" does report the option with correct name, which is the
beauty of automation ;-)

Thanks, both.  Will queue, together with [2/2] which also makes
sense.
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason Nov. 23, 2020, 10:18 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, Nov 21 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The --keep-base-pack option never existed in git.git. It was the name
>> for the --keep-largest-pack option in earlier revisions of that series
>> before it landed as ae4e89e549 ("gc: add --keep-largest-pack option",
>> 2018-04-15).
>
> Is it a sign that this hasn't been used by or useful to our users
> that this documentation bug did not get noticed by anybody for the
> past 30 months, I wonder.

FWIW I used it in a major git deployment since before it landed on
"master" as gc.bigPackThreshold, but not the CLI option. 

I think a lot of these CLI options for gc/repack are relatively unused
compared to the config, but it's still arguably useful to have them for
one-off testing (although you could also just use "git -c ...").

> "git gc -h" does report the option with correct name, which is the
> beauty of automation ;-)
>
> Thanks, both.  Will queue, together with [2/2] which also makes
> sense.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/config/gc.txt b/Documentation/config/gc.txt
index 00ea0a678e..c834e07991 100644
--- a/Documentation/config/gc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config/gc.txt
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @@  gc.autoDetach::
 
 gc.bigPackThreshold::
 	If non-zero, all packs larger than this limit are kept when
-	`git gc` is run. This is very similar to `--keep-base-pack`
+	`git gc` is run. This is very similar to `--keep-largest-pack`
 	except that all packs that meet the threshold are kept, not
-	just the base pack. Defaults to zero. Common unit suffixes of
+	just the largest pack. Defaults to zero. Common unit suffixes of
 	'k', 'm', or 'g' are supported.
 +
 Note that if the number of kept packs is more than gc.autoPackLimit,
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@  gc.autoPackLimit and gc.bigPackThreshold should be respected again.
 If the amount of memory estimated for `git repack` to run smoothly is
 not available and `gc.bigPackThreshold` is not set, the largest pack
 will also be excluded (this is the equivalent of running `git gc` with
-`--keep-base-pack`).
+`--keep-largest-pack`).
 
 gc.writeCommitGraph::
 	If true, then gc will rewrite the commit-graph file when