Message ID | 20201209194212.5131-8-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Delegated to: | Mike Snitzer |
Headers | show |
Series | IMA: support for measuring kernel integrity critical data | expand |
On 2020-12-09 11:42:11, Tushar Sugandhi wrote: > From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> > > Define a new critical data builtin policy to allow measuring > early kernel integrity critical data before a custom IMA policy > is loaded. > > Add critical data to built-in IMA rules if the kernel command line > contains "ima_policy=critical_data". > > Update the documentation on kernel parameters to document > the new critical data builtin policy. > > Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> Tyler > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 ++++- > security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > index 526d65d8573a..6034d75c3ca0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > @@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ > ima_policy= [IMA] > The builtin policies to load during IMA setup. > Format: "tcb | appraise_tcb | secure_boot | > - fail_securely" > + fail_securely | critical_data" > > The "tcb" policy measures all programs exec'd, files > mmap'd for exec, and all files opened with the read > @@ -1765,6 +1765,9 @@ > filesystems with the SB_I_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGNATURE > flag. > > + The "critical_data" policy measures kernel integrity > + critical data. > + > ima_tcb [IMA] Deprecated. Use ima_policy= instead. > Load a policy which meets the needs of the Trusted > Computing Base. This means IMA will measure all > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > index 7486d09a3f60..37ca16a9e65f 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > @@ -206,6 +206,10 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = { > .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, > }; > > +static struct ima_rule_entry critical_data_rules[] __ro_after_init = { > + {.action = MEASURE, .func = CRITICAL_DATA, .flags = IMA_FUNC}, > +}; > + > /* An array of architecture specific rules */ > static struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init; > > @@ -228,6 +232,7 @@ __setup("ima_tcb", default_measure_policy_setup); > > static bool ima_use_appraise_tcb __initdata; > static bool ima_use_secure_boot __initdata; > +static bool ima_use_critical_data __initdata; > static bool ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs __ro_after_init; > static int __init policy_setup(char *str) > { > @@ -242,6 +247,8 @@ static int __init policy_setup(char *str) > ima_use_appraise_tcb = true; > else if (strcmp(p, "secure_boot") == 0) > ima_use_secure_boot = true; > + else if (strcmp(p, "critical_data") == 0) > + ima_use_critical_data = true; > else if (strcmp(p, "fail_securely") == 0) > ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs = true; > else > @@ -875,6 +882,11 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) > ARRAY_SIZE(default_appraise_rules), > IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); > > + if (ima_use_critical_data) > + add_rules(critical_data_rules, > + ARRAY_SIZE(critical_data_rules), > + IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); > + > ima_update_policy_flag(); > } > > -- > 2.17.1 > -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
On 2020-12-10 3:22 p.m., Tyler Hicks wrote: > On 2020-12-09 11:42:11, Tushar Sugandhi wrote: >> From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> >> >> Define a new critical data builtin policy to allow measuring >> early kernel integrity critical data before a custom IMA policy >> is loaded. >> >> Add critical data to built-in IMA rules if the kernel command line >> contains "ima_policy=critical_data". >> >> Update the documentation on kernel parameters to document >> the new critical data builtin policy. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> > > Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> > > Tyler > Thanks for the review. ~Tushar -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt index 526d65d8573a..6034d75c3ca0 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ ima_policy= [IMA] The builtin policies to load during IMA setup. Format: "tcb | appraise_tcb | secure_boot | - fail_securely" + fail_securely | critical_data" The "tcb" policy measures all programs exec'd, files mmap'd for exec, and all files opened with the read @@ -1765,6 +1765,9 @@ filesystems with the SB_I_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGNATURE flag. + The "critical_data" policy measures kernel integrity + critical data. + ima_tcb [IMA] Deprecated. Use ima_policy= instead. Load a policy which meets the needs of the Trusted Computing Base. This means IMA will measure all diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 7486d09a3f60..37ca16a9e65f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -206,6 +206,10 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = { .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, }; +static struct ima_rule_entry critical_data_rules[] __ro_after_init = { + {.action = MEASURE, .func = CRITICAL_DATA, .flags = IMA_FUNC}, +}; + /* An array of architecture specific rules */ static struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init; @@ -228,6 +232,7 @@ __setup("ima_tcb", default_measure_policy_setup); static bool ima_use_appraise_tcb __initdata; static bool ima_use_secure_boot __initdata; +static bool ima_use_critical_data __initdata; static bool ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs __ro_after_init; static int __init policy_setup(char *str) { @@ -242,6 +247,8 @@ static int __init policy_setup(char *str) ima_use_appraise_tcb = true; else if (strcmp(p, "secure_boot") == 0) ima_use_secure_boot = true; + else if (strcmp(p, "critical_data") == 0) + ima_use_critical_data = true; else if (strcmp(p, "fail_securely") == 0) ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs = true; else @@ -875,6 +882,11 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) ARRAY_SIZE(default_appraise_rules), IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); + if (ima_use_critical_data) + add_rules(critical_data_rules, + ARRAY_SIZE(critical_data_rules), + IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); + ima_update_policy_flag(); }