Message ID | 20210106170944.1253046-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [net-next] net: phy: bcm7xxx: Add an entry for BCM72116 | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net-next |
netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
netdev/cc_maintainers | success | CCed 8 of 8 maintainers |
netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 12 this patch: 12 |
netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 21 lines checked |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 12 this patch: 12 |
netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
netdev/stable | success | Stable not CCed |
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:09:44AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > BCM72116 features a 28nm integrated EPHY, add an entry to match this PHY > OUI. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Andrew
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:09:44 -0800 Florian Fainelli wrote: > BCM72116 features a 28nm integrated EPHY, add an entry to match this PHY > OUI. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> net or net-next? Looks like just adding and ID and there is nothing new in net-next in the area AFAICT.
On 1/7/21 12:50 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:09:44 -0800 Florian Fainelli wrote: >> BCM72116 features a 28nm integrated EPHY, add an entry to match this PHY >> OUI. >> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> > > net or net-next? Looks like just adding and ID and there is nothing new > in net-next in the area AFAICT. This is net-next material IMHO at least that's what I put in the subject.
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/bcm7xxx.c b/drivers/net/phy/bcm7xxx.c index 15812001b3ff..e79297a4bae8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/bcm7xxx.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/bcm7xxx.c @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ static void bcm7xxx_28nm_remove(struct phy_device *phydev) static struct phy_driver bcm7xxx_driver[] = { BCM7XXX_28NM_EPHY(PHY_ID_BCM72113, "Broadcom BCM72113"), + BCM7XXX_28NM_EPHY(PHY_ID_BCM72116, "Broadcom BCM72116"), BCM7XXX_28NM_GPHY(PHY_ID_BCM7250, "Broadcom BCM7250"), BCM7XXX_28NM_EPHY(PHY_ID_BCM7255, "Broadcom BCM7255"), BCM7XXX_28NM_EPHY(PHY_ID_BCM7260, "Broadcom BCM7260"), @@ -633,6 +634,7 @@ static struct phy_driver bcm7xxx_driver[] = { static struct mdio_device_id __maybe_unused bcm7xxx_tbl[] = { { PHY_ID_BCM72113, 0xfffffff0 }, + { PHY_ID_BCM72116, 0xfffffff0, }, { PHY_ID_BCM7250, 0xfffffff0, }, { PHY_ID_BCM7255, 0xfffffff0, }, { PHY_ID_BCM7260, 0xfffffff0, }, diff --git a/include/linux/brcmphy.h b/include/linux/brcmphy.h index d0bd226d6bd9..de9430d55c90 100644 --- a/include/linux/brcmphy.h +++ b/include/linux/brcmphy.h @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #define PHY_ID_BCM89610 0x03625cd0 #define PHY_ID_BCM72113 0x35905310 +#define PHY_ID_BCM72116 0x35905350 #define PHY_ID_BCM7250 0xae025280 #define PHY_ID_BCM7255 0xae025120 #define PHY_ID_BCM7260 0xae025190
BCM72116 features a 28nm integrated EPHY, add an entry to match this PHY OUI. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> --- drivers/net/phy/bcm7xxx.c | 2 ++ include/linux/brcmphy.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)