diff mbox series

[v3,net-next,05/10] net: dsa: felix: perform teardown in reverse order of setup

Message ID 20210108175950.484854-6-olteanv@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series Configuring congestion watermarks on ocelot switch using devlink-sb | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 2 maintainers not CCed: vladimir.oltean@nxp.com davem@davemloft.net
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 19 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link
netdev/stable success Stable not CCed

Commit Message

Vladimir Oltean Jan. 8, 2021, 5:59 p.m. UTC
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

In general it is desirable that cleanup is the reverse process of setup.
In this case I am not seeing any particular issue, but with the
introduction of devlink-sb for felix, a non-obvious decision had to be
made as to where to put its cleanup method. When there's a convention in
place, that decision becomes obvious.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
Changes in v3:
None.

Changes in v2:
None.

 drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Florian Fainelli Jan. 8, 2021, 6:34 p.m. UTC | #1
On 1/8/2021 9:59 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> 
> In general it is desirable that cleanup is the reverse process of setup.
> In this case I am not seeing any particular issue, but with the
> introduction of devlink-sb for felix, a non-obvious decision had to be
> made as to where to put its cleanup method. When there's a convention in
> place, that decision becomes obvious.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
index 79d0508e5910..42770a86e871 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
@@ -639,14 +639,13 @@  static void felix_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 	struct felix *felix = ocelot_to_felix(ocelot);
 	int port;
 
-	if (felix->info->mdio_bus_free)
-		felix->info->mdio_bus_free(ocelot);
-
+	if (ocelot->ptp)
+		ocelot_deinit_timestamp(ocelot);
+	ocelot_deinit(ocelot);
 	for (port = 0; port < ocelot->num_phys_ports; port++)
 		ocelot_deinit_port(ocelot, port);
-	ocelot_deinit_timestamp(ocelot);
-	/* stop workqueue thread */
-	ocelot_deinit(ocelot);
+	if (felix->info->mdio_bus_free)
+		felix->info->mdio_bus_free(ocelot);
 }
 
 static int felix_hwtstamp_get(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,