Message ID | 20210119105203.15530-1-yong.wu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] of/device: Update dma_range_map only when dev has valid dma-ranges | expand |
Hi, On Tue 19 Jan 21, 18:52, Yong Wu wrote: > The commit e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, > supplanting dma_pfn_offset") always update dma_range_map even though it was > already set, like in the sunxi_mbus driver. the issue is reported at [1]. > This patch avoid this(Updating it only when dev has valid dma-ranges). > > Meanwhile, dma_range_map contains the devices' dma_ranges information, > This patch moves dma_range_map before of_iommu_configure. The iommu > driver may need to know the dma_address requirements of its iommu > consumer devices. Just a gentle ping on this issue, it would be nice to have this fix merged ASAP, in the next RC :) Cheers, Paul > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5c7946f3-b56e-da00-a750-be097c7ceb32@arm.com/ > > CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > CC: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> > Fixes: e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset"), > Suggested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/of/device.c | 10 +++++++--- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c > index aedfaaafd3e7..1122daa8e273 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/device.c > +++ b/drivers/of/device.c > @@ -162,9 +162,11 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, > mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(ilog2(end) + 1); > dev->coherent_dma_mask &= mask; > *dev->dma_mask &= mask; > - /* ...but only set bus limit if we found valid dma-ranges earlier */ > - if (!ret) > + /* ...but only set bus limit and range map if we found valid dma-ranges earlier */ > + if (!ret) { > dev->bus_dma_limit = end; > + dev->dma_range_map = map; > + } > > coherent = of_dma_is_coherent(np); > dev_dbg(dev, "device is%sdma coherent\n", > @@ -172,6 +174,9 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, > > iommu = of_iommu_configure(dev, np, id); > if (PTR_ERR(iommu) == -EPROBE_DEFER) { > + /* Don't touch range map if it wasn't set from a valid dma-ranges */ > + if (!ret) > + dev->dma_range_map = NULL; > kfree(map); > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > } > @@ -181,7 +186,6 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, > > arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_start, size, iommu, coherent); > > - dev->dma_range_map = map; > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_configure_id); > -- > 2.18.0 >
[ + Christoph, Marek ] On 2021-01-27 13:00, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue 19 Jan 21, 18:52, Yong Wu wrote: >> The commit e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, >> supplanting dma_pfn_offset") always update dma_range_map even though it was >> already set, like in the sunxi_mbus driver. the issue is reported at [1]. >> This patch avoid this(Updating it only when dev has valid dma-ranges). >> >> Meanwhile, dma_range_map contains the devices' dma_ranges information, >> This patch moves dma_range_map before of_iommu_configure. The iommu >> driver may need to know the dma_address requirements of its iommu >> consumer devices. > > Just a gentle ping on this issue, it would be nice to have this fix merged > ASAP, in the next RC :) Ack to that - Rob, Frank, do you want to take this through the OF tree, or shall we take it through the DMA-mapping tree like the original culprit? Thanks, Robin. > > Cheers, > > Paul > >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5c7946f3-b56e-da00-a750-be097c7ceb32@arm.com/ >> >> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> >> CC: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> >> Fixes: e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset"), >> Suggested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >> --- >> drivers/of/device.c | 10 +++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c >> index aedfaaafd3e7..1122daa8e273 100644 >> --- a/drivers/of/device.c >> +++ b/drivers/of/device.c >> @@ -162,9 +162,11 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, >> mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(ilog2(end) + 1); >> dev->coherent_dma_mask &= mask; >> *dev->dma_mask &= mask; >> - /* ...but only set bus limit if we found valid dma-ranges earlier */ >> - if (!ret) >> + /* ...but only set bus limit and range map if we found valid dma-ranges earlier */ >> + if (!ret) { >> dev->bus_dma_limit = end; >> + dev->dma_range_map = map; >> + } >> >> coherent = of_dma_is_coherent(np); >> dev_dbg(dev, "device is%sdma coherent\n", >> @@ -172,6 +174,9 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, >> >> iommu = of_iommu_configure(dev, np, id); >> if (PTR_ERR(iommu) == -EPROBE_DEFER) { >> + /* Don't touch range map if it wasn't set from a valid dma-ranges */ >> + if (!ret) >> + dev->dma_range_map = NULL; >> kfree(map); >> return -EPROBE_DEFER; >> } >> @@ -181,7 +186,6 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, >> >> arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_start, size, iommu, coherent); >> >> - dev->dma_range_map = map; >> return 0; >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_configure_id); >> -- >> 2.18.0 >> >
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:52 AM Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> wrote: > > The commit e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, > supplanting dma_pfn_offset") always update dma_range_map even though it was > already set, like in the sunxi_mbus driver. the issue is reported at [1]. > This patch avoid this(Updating it only when dev has valid dma-ranges). only when dev *doesn't* have valid dma-ranges? > Meanwhile, dma_range_map contains the devices' dma_ranges information, > This patch moves dma_range_map before of_iommu_configure. The iommu > driver may need to know the dma_address requirements of its iommu > consumer devices. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5c7946f3-b56e-da00-a750-be097c7ceb32@arm.com/ > > CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > CC: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> > Fixes: e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset"), > Suggested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/of/device.c | 10 +++++++--- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c > index aedfaaafd3e7..1122daa8e273 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/device.c > +++ b/drivers/of/device.c > @@ -162,9 +162,11 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, > mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(ilog2(end) + 1); > dev->coherent_dma_mask &= mask; > *dev->dma_mask &= mask; > - /* ...but only set bus limit if we found valid dma-ranges earlier */ > - if (!ret) > + /* ...but only set bus limit and range map if we found valid dma-ranges earlier */ > + if (!ret) { > dev->bus_dma_limit = end; > + dev->dma_range_map = map; > + } > > coherent = of_dma_is_coherent(np); > dev_dbg(dev, "device is%sdma coherent\n", > @@ -172,6 +174,9 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, > > iommu = of_iommu_configure(dev, np, id); > if (PTR_ERR(iommu) == -EPROBE_DEFER) { > + /* Don't touch range map if it wasn't set from a valid dma-ranges */ > + if (!ret) > + dev->dma_range_map = NULL; > kfree(map); > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > } > @@ -181,7 +186,6 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, > > arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_start, size, iommu, coherent); > > - dev->dma_range_map = map; > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_configure_id); > -- > 2.18.0 >
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 7:13 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote: > > [ + Christoph, Marek ] > > On 2021-01-27 13:00, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue 19 Jan 21, 18:52, Yong Wu wrote: > >> The commit e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, > >> supplanting dma_pfn_offset") always update dma_range_map even though it was > >> already set, like in the sunxi_mbus driver. the issue is reported at [1]. > >> This patch avoid this(Updating it only when dev has valid dma-ranges). > >> > >> Meanwhile, dma_range_map contains the devices' dma_ranges information, > >> This patch moves dma_range_map before of_iommu_configure. The iommu > >> driver may need to know the dma_address requirements of its iommu > >> consumer devices. > > > > Just a gentle ping on this issue, it would be nice to have this fix merged > > ASAP, in the next RC :) > > Ack to that - Rob, Frank, do you want to take this through the OF tree, > or shall we take it through the DMA-mapping tree like the original culprit? I've already got some fixes queued up and can take it. Suggested-by doesn't mean you are happy with the implementation. So Acked-by or Reviewed-by? Rob
On 2021-01-27 19:07, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:52 AM Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> wrote: >> >> The commit e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, >> supplanting dma_pfn_offset") always update dma_range_map even though it was >> already set, like in the sunxi_mbus driver. the issue is reported at [1]. >> This patch avoid this(Updating it only when dev has valid dma-ranges). > > only when dev *doesn't* have valid dma-ranges? I believe the intent is to mean when a valid "dma-ranges" property is specified in DT. The implementation allows DT to take precedence even if platform code *has* already installed a dma_range_map, although we shouldn't expect that to ever happen (except perhaps in the wild early days of platform bringup). Robin. >> Meanwhile, dma_range_map contains the devices' dma_ranges information, >> This patch moves dma_range_map before of_iommu_configure. The iommu >> driver may need to know the dma_address requirements of its iommu >> consumer devices. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5c7946f3-b56e-da00-a750-be097c7ceb32@arm.com/ >> >> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> >> CC: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> >> Fixes: e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset"), >> Suggested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >> --- >> drivers/of/device.c | 10 +++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c >> index aedfaaafd3e7..1122daa8e273 100644 >> --- a/drivers/of/device.c >> +++ b/drivers/of/device.c >> @@ -162,9 +162,11 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, >> mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(ilog2(end) + 1); >> dev->coherent_dma_mask &= mask; >> *dev->dma_mask &= mask; >> - /* ...but only set bus limit if we found valid dma-ranges earlier */ >> - if (!ret) >> + /* ...but only set bus limit and range map if we found valid dma-ranges earlier */ >> + if (!ret) { >> dev->bus_dma_limit = end; >> + dev->dma_range_map = map; >> + } >> >> coherent = of_dma_is_coherent(np); >> dev_dbg(dev, "device is%sdma coherent\n", >> @@ -172,6 +174,9 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, >> >> iommu = of_iommu_configure(dev, np, id); >> if (PTR_ERR(iommu) == -EPROBE_DEFER) { >> + /* Don't touch range map if it wasn't set from a valid dma-ranges */ >> + if (!ret) >> + dev->dma_range_map = NULL; >> kfree(map); >> return -EPROBE_DEFER; >> } >> @@ -181,7 +186,6 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, >> >> arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_start, size, iommu, coherent); >> >> - dev->dma_range_map = map; >> return 0; >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_configure_id); >> -- >> 2.18.0 >> > _______________________________________________ > iommu mailing list > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu >
On 2021-01-27 19:09, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 7:13 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote: >> >> [ + Christoph, Marek ] >> >> On 2021-01-27 13:00, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue 19 Jan 21, 18:52, Yong Wu wrote: >>>> The commit e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, >>>> supplanting dma_pfn_offset") always update dma_range_map even though it was >>>> already set, like in the sunxi_mbus driver. the issue is reported at [1]. >>>> This patch avoid this(Updating it only when dev has valid dma-ranges). >>>> >>>> Meanwhile, dma_range_map contains the devices' dma_ranges information, >>>> This patch moves dma_range_map before of_iommu_configure. The iommu >>>> driver may need to know the dma_address requirements of its iommu >>>> consumer devices. >>> >>> Just a gentle ping on this issue, it would be nice to have this fix merged >>> ASAP, in the next RC :) >> >> Ack to that - Rob, Frank, do you want to take this through the OF tree, >> or shall we take it through the DMA-mapping tree like the original culprit? > > I've already got some fixes queued up and can take it. Brilliant, thanks! > Suggested-by doesn't mean you are happy with the implementation. So > Acked-by or Reviewed-by? It still feels slightly awkward to give a tag to say "yes, this is exactly what I suggested", but for the avoidance of doubt, Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Cheers, Robin.
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:52:03 +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > The commit e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, > supplanting dma_pfn_offset") always update dma_range_map even though it was > already set, like in the sunxi_mbus driver. the issue is reported at [1]. > This patch avoid this(Updating it only when dev has valid dma-ranges). > > Meanwhile, dma_range_map contains the devices' dma_ranges information, > This patch moves dma_range_map before of_iommu_configure. The iommu > driver may need to know the dma_address requirements of its iommu > consumer devices. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5c7946f3-b56e-da00-a750-be097c7ceb32@arm.com/ > > CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > CC: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> > Fixes: e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset"), > Suggested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/of/device.c | 10 +++++++--- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Applied, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c index aedfaaafd3e7..1122daa8e273 100644 --- a/drivers/of/device.c +++ b/drivers/of/device.c @@ -162,9 +162,11 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(ilog2(end) + 1); dev->coherent_dma_mask &= mask; *dev->dma_mask &= mask; - /* ...but only set bus limit if we found valid dma-ranges earlier */ - if (!ret) + /* ...but only set bus limit and range map if we found valid dma-ranges earlier */ + if (!ret) { dev->bus_dma_limit = end; + dev->dma_range_map = map; + } coherent = of_dma_is_coherent(np); dev_dbg(dev, "device is%sdma coherent\n", @@ -172,6 +174,9 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, iommu = of_iommu_configure(dev, np, id); if (PTR_ERR(iommu) == -EPROBE_DEFER) { + /* Don't touch range map if it wasn't set from a valid dma-ranges */ + if (!ret) + dev->dma_range_map = NULL; kfree(map); return -EPROBE_DEFER; } @@ -181,7 +186,6 @@ int of_dma_configure_id(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_start, size, iommu, coherent); - dev->dma_range_map = map; return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_configure_id);