diff mbox series

[7/8,v1.5] arm64: Always keep DAIF.[IF] in sync

Message ID 20210219172530.45805-1-marcan@marcan.st (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series None | expand

Commit Message

Hector Martin Feb. 19, 2021, 5:25 p.m. UTC
Apple SoCs (A11 and newer) have some interrupt sources hardwired to the
FIQ line. We implement support for this by simply treating IRQs and FIQs
the same way in the interrupt vectors.

To support these systems, the FIQ mask bit needs to be kept in sync with
the IRQ mask bit, so both kinds of exceptions are masked together. No
other platforms should be delivering FIQ exceptions right now, and we
already unmask FIQ in normal process context, so this should not have an
effect on other systems - if spurious FIQs were arriving, they would
already panic the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h  |  8 ++++----
 arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h  | 10 +++++-----
 arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h   | 16 +++++++---------
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S           | 12 +++++++-----
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c         |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c             |  1 +
 7 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

This is the updated patch after addressing the comments in the original
v2 review; we're moving it to this series now, so please review it in
this context.

--
2.30.0

Comments

Mark Rutland Feb. 19, 2021, 6:26 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:25:30AM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> Apple SoCs (A11 and newer) have some interrupt sources hardwired to the
> FIQ line. We implement support for this by simply treating IRQs and FIQs
> the same way in the interrupt vectors.
> 
> To support these systems, the FIQ mask bit needs to be kept in sync with
> the IRQ mask bit, so both kinds of exceptions are masked together. No
> other platforms should be delivering FIQ exceptions right now, and we
> already unmask FIQ in normal process context, so this should not have an
> effect on other systems - if spurious FIQs were arriving, they would
> already panic the kernel.

This looks good to me; I've picked this up and pushed out my arm64/fiq
branch [1,2] incorporating this, tagged as arm64-fiq-20210219.

I'll give this version a few days to gather comments before I post a v2.

[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm64/fiq
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/fiqA

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> 
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h  |  8 ++++----
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h  | 10 +++++-----
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h   | 16 +++++++---------
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S           | 12 +++++++-----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/process.c         |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c             |  1 +
>  7 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> This is the updated patch after addressing the comments in the original
> v2 review; we're moving it to this series now, so please review it in
> this context.
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
> index 880b9054d75c..934b9be582d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static inline void gic_pmr_mask_irqs(void)
> 
>  static inline void gic_arch_enable_irqs(void)
>  {
> -	asm volatile ("msr daifclr, #2" : : : "memory");
> +	asm volatile ("msr daifclr, #3" : : : "memory");
>  }
> 
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> index bf125c591116..53ff8c71eed7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -40,9 +40,9 @@
>  	msr	daif, \flags
>  	.endm
> 
> -	/* IRQ is the lowest priority flag, unconditionally unmask the rest. */
> -	.macro enable_da_f
> -	msr	daifclr, #(8 | 4 | 1)
> +	/* IRQ/FIQ are the lowest priority flags, unconditionally unmask the rest. */
> +	.macro enable_da
> +	msr	daifclr, #(8 | 4)
>  	.endm
> 
>  /*
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
>   */
>  	.macro	save_and_disable_irq, flags
>  	mrs	\flags, daif
> -	msr	daifset, #2
> +	msr	daifset, #3
>  	.endm
> 
>  	.macro	restore_irq, flags
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> index 1c26d7baa67f..5eb7af9c4557 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
>  #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> 
>  #define DAIF_PROCCTX		0
> -#define DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ	PSR_I_BIT
> -#define DAIF_ERRCTX		(PSR_I_BIT | PSR_A_BIT)
> +#define DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ	(PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT)
> +#define DAIF_ERRCTX		(PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT)
>  #define DAIF_MASK		(PSR_D_BIT | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT)
> 
> 
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static inline unsigned long local_daif_save_flags(void)
>  	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
>  		/* If IRQs are masked with PMR, reflect it in the flags */
>  		if (read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) != GIC_PRIO_IRQON)
> -			flags |= PSR_I_BIT;
> +			flags |= PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT;
>  	}
> 
>  	return flags;
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static inline void local_daif_restore(unsigned long flags)
>  	bool irq_disabled = flags & PSR_I_BIT;
> 
>  	WARN_ON(system_has_prio_mask_debugging() &&
> -		!(read_sysreg(daif) & PSR_I_BIT));
> +		(read_sysreg(daif) & (PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT)) != (PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT));
> 
>  	if (!irq_disabled) {
>  		trace_hardirqs_on();
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static inline void local_daif_restore(unsigned long flags)
>  			 * If interrupts are disabled but we can take
>  			 * asynchronous errors, we can take NMIs
>  			 */
> -			flags &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
> +			flags &= ~(PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT);
>  			pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF;
>  		} else {
>  			pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
> index ff328e5bbb75..b57b9b1e4344 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
> @@ -12,15 +12,13 @@
> 
>  /*
>   * Aarch64 has flags for masking: Debug, Asynchronous (serror), Interrupts and
> - * FIQ exceptions, in the 'daif' register. We mask and unmask them in 'dai'
> + * FIQ exceptions, in the 'daif' register. We mask and unmask them in 'daif'
>   * order:
>   * Masking debug exceptions causes all other exceptions to be masked too/
> - * Masking SError masks irq, but not debug exceptions. Masking irqs has no
> - * side effects for other flags. Keeping to this order makes it easier for
> - * entry.S to know which exceptions should be unmasked.
> - *
> - * FIQ is never expected, but we mask it when we disable debug exceptions, and
> - * unmask it at all other times.
> + * Masking SError masks IRQ/FIQ, but not debug exceptions. IRQ and FIQ are
> + * always masked and unmasked together, and have no side effects for other
> + * flags. Keeping to this order makes it easier for entry.S to know which
> + * exceptions should be unmasked.
>   */
> 
>  /*
> @@ -35,7 +33,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_enable(void)
>  	}
> 
>  	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
> -		"msr	daifclr, #2		// arch_local_irq_enable",
> +		"msr	daifclr, #3		// arch_local_irq_enable",
>  		__msr_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, "%0"),
>  		ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
>  		:
> @@ -54,7 +52,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
>  	}
> 
>  	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
> -		"msr	daifset, #2		// arch_local_irq_disable",
> +		"msr	daifset, #3		// arch_local_irq_disable",
>  		__msr_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, "%0"),
>  		ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
>  		:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index acc677672277..af04ce5088ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ alternative_endif
> 
>  	.macro el1_interrupt_handler, handler:req
>  	gic_prio_irq_setup pmr=x20, tmp=x1
> -	enable_da_f
> +	enable_da
> 
>  	mov	x0, sp
>  	bl	enter_el1_irq_or_nmi
> @@ -544,8 +544,10 @@ alternative_endif
>  	ldr	x24, [tsk, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT]	// get preempt count
>  alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING
>  	/*
> -	 * DA_F were cleared at start of handling. If anything is set in DAIF,
> -	 * we come back from an NMI, so skip preemption
> +	 * DA were cleared at start of handling, and IF are cleared by
> +	 * the GIC irqchip driver using gic_arch_enable_irqs() for
> +	 * normal IRQs. If anything is set, it means we come back from
> +	 * an NMI instead of a normal IRQ, so skip preemption
>  	 */
>  	mrs	x0, daif
>  	orr	x24, x24, x0
> @@ -562,7 +564,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
>  	.macro el0_interrupt_handler, handler:req
>  	gic_prio_irq_setup pmr=x20, tmp=x0
>  	user_exit_irqoff
> -	enable_da_f
> +	enable_da
> 
>  	tbz	x22, #55, 1f
>  	bl	do_el0_irq_bp_hardening
> @@ -763,7 +765,7 @@ el0_error_naked:
>  	mov	x0, sp
>  	mov	x1, x25
>  	bl	do_serror
> -	enable_da_f
> +	enable_da
>  	b	ret_to_user
>  SYM_CODE_END(el0_error)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index 6616486a58fe..34ec400288d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static void noinstr __cpu_do_idle_irqprio(void)
>  	unsigned long daif_bits;
> 
>  	daif_bits = read_sysreg(daif);
> -	write_sysreg(daif_bits | PSR_I_BIT, daif);
> +	write_sysreg(daif_bits | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT, daif);
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * Unmask PMR before going idle to make sure interrupts can
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index ad00f99ee9b0..9dee8a17b1ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ static void init_gic_priority_masking(void)
>  	cpuflags = read_sysreg(daif);
> 
>  	WARN_ON(!(cpuflags & PSR_I_BIT));
> +	WARN_ON(!(cpuflags & PSR_F_BIT));
> 
>  	gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
>  }
> --
> 2.30.0
>
Hector Martin Feb. 22, 2021, 5:39 p.m. UTC | #2
On 20/02/2021 03.26, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:25:30AM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
>> Apple SoCs (A11 and newer) have some interrupt sources hardwired to the
>> FIQ line. We implement support for this by simply treating IRQs and FIQs
>> the same way in the interrupt vectors.
>>
>> To support these systems, the FIQ mask bit needs to be kept in sync with
>> the IRQ mask bit, so both kinds of exceptions are masked together. No
>> other platforms should be delivering FIQ exceptions right now, and we
>> already unmask FIQ in normal process context, so this should not have an
>> effect on other systems - if spurious FIQs were arriving, they would
>> already panic the kernel.
> 
> This looks good to me; I've picked this up and pushed out my arm64/fiq
> branch [1,2] incorporating this, tagged as arm64-fiq-20210219.
> 
> I'll give this version a few days to gather comments before I post a v2.
> 
> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm64/fiq
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/fiqA

Thanks! Any chance you can do a rebase on top of torvalds/master? Since 
Marc's nVHE changes went in, we're going to need to add a workaround 
patch for the M1's lack of nVHE mode, which is going to be in the next 
version of my M1 bringup series - but right now that would involve 
telling people to merge two trees to build a base to apply it on, which 
is sub-optimal.
Mark Rutland Feb. 22, 2021, 6:43 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 02:39:11AM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> On 20/02/2021 03.26, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:25:30AM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> > > Apple SoCs (A11 and newer) have some interrupt sources hardwired to the
> > > FIQ line. We implement support for this by simply treating IRQs and FIQs
> > > the same way in the interrupt vectors.
> > > 
> > > To support these systems, the FIQ mask bit needs to be kept in sync with
> > > the IRQ mask bit, so both kinds of exceptions are masked together. No
> > > other platforms should be delivering FIQ exceptions right now, and we
> > > already unmask FIQ in normal process context, so this should not have an
> > > effect on other systems - if spurious FIQs were arriving, they would
> > > already panic the kernel.
> > 
> > This looks good to me; I've picked this up and pushed out my arm64/fiq
> > branch [1,2] incorporating this, tagged as arm64-fiq-20210219.
> > 
> > I'll give this version a few days to gather comments before I post a v2.
> > 
> > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm64/fiq
> > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/fiqA
> 
> Thanks! Any chance you can do a rebase on top of torvalds/master? Since
> Marc's nVHE changes went in, we're going to need to add a workaround patch
> for the M1's lack of nVHE mode, which is going to be in the next version of
> my M1 bringup series - but right now that would involve telling people to
> merge two trees to build a base to apply it on, which is sub-optimal.

I generally try to base on a stable tag/commit, so I'd prefer to avoid
rebasing the development branch until rc1 if possible. I've pushed out a
new arm64-fiq-mainline-20210222 tag rebased atop torvalds/master:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm64-fiq-mainline-20210222
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/tag/?h=arm64-fiq-mainline-20210222

... leaving the main branch atop v5.11. Is that good enough for now? If
that's painful for development I can shuffle the main branch along too.

Thanks,
Mark.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
index 880b9054d75c..934b9be582d2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@  static inline void gic_pmr_mask_irqs(void)

 static inline void gic_arch_enable_irqs(void)
 {
-	asm volatile ("msr daifclr, #2" : : : "memory");
+	asm volatile ("msr daifclr, #3" : : : "memory");
 }

 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
index bf125c591116..53ff8c71eed7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
@@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ 
 	msr	daif, \flags
 	.endm

-	/* IRQ is the lowest priority flag, unconditionally unmask the rest. */
-	.macro enable_da_f
-	msr	daifclr, #(8 | 4 | 1)
+	/* IRQ/FIQ are the lowest priority flags, unconditionally unmask the rest. */
+	.macro enable_da
+	msr	daifclr, #(8 | 4)
 	.endm

 /*
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ 
  */
 	.macro	save_and_disable_irq, flags
 	mrs	\flags, daif
-	msr	daifset, #2
+	msr	daifset, #3
 	.endm

 	.macro	restore_irq, flags
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
index 1c26d7baa67f..5eb7af9c4557 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ 
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>

 #define DAIF_PROCCTX		0
-#define DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ	PSR_I_BIT
-#define DAIF_ERRCTX		(PSR_I_BIT | PSR_A_BIT)
+#define DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ	(PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT)
+#define DAIF_ERRCTX		(PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT)
 #define DAIF_MASK		(PSR_D_BIT | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT)


@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@  static inline unsigned long local_daif_save_flags(void)
 	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
 		/* If IRQs are masked with PMR, reflect it in the flags */
 		if (read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) != GIC_PRIO_IRQON)
-			flags |= PSR_I_BIT;
+			flags |= PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT;
 	}

 	return flags;
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@  static inline void local_daif_restore(unsigned long flags)
 	bool irq_disabled = flags & PSR_I_BIT;

 	WARN_ON(system_has_prio_mask_debugging() &&
-		!(read_sysreg(daif) & PSR_I_BIT));
+		(read_sysreg(daif) & (PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT)) != (PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT));

 	if (!irq_disabled) {
 		trace_hardirqs_on();
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@  static inline void local_daif_restore(unsigned long flags)
 			 * If interrupts are disabled but we can take
 			 * asynchronous errors, we can take NMIs
 			 */
-			flags &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
+			flags &= ~(PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT);
 			pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF;
 		} else {
 			pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
index ff328e5bbb75..b57b9b1e4344 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
@@ -12,15 +12,13 @@ 

 /*
  * Aarch64 has flags for masking: Debug, Asynchronous (serror), Interrupts and
- * FIQ exceptions, in the 'daif' register. We mask and unmask them in 'dai'
+ * FIQ exceptions, in the 'daif' register. We mask and unmask them in 'daif'
  * order:
  * Masking debug exceptions causes all other exceptions to be masked too/
- * Masking SError masks irq, but not debug exceptions. Masking irqs has no
- * side effects for other flags. Keeping to this order makes it easier for
- * entry.S to know which exceptions should be unmasked.
- *
- * FIQ is never expected, but we mask it when we disable debug exceptions, and
- * unmask it at all other times.
+ * Masking SError masks IRQ/FIQ, but not debug exceptions. IRQ and FIQ are
+ * always masked and unmasked together, and have no side effects for other
+ * flags. Keeping to this order makes it easier for entry.S to know which
+ * exceptions should be unmasked.
  */

 /*
@@ -35,7 +33,7 @@  static inline void arch_local_irq_enable(void)
 	}

 	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
-		"msr	daifclr, #2		// arch_local_irq_enable",
+		"msr	daifclr, #3		// arch_local_irq_enable",
 		__msr_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, "%0"),
 		ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
 		:
@@ -54,7 +52,7 @@  static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
 	}

 	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
-		"msr	daifset, #2		// arch_local_irq_disable",
+		"msr	daifset, #3		// arch_local_irq_disable",
 		__msr_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, "%0"),
 		ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
 		:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index acc677672277..af04ce5088ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@  alternative_endif

 	.macro el1_interrupt_handler, handler:req
 	gic_prio_irq_setup pmr=x20, tmp=x1
-	enable_da_f
+	enable_da

 	mov	x0, sp
 	bl	enter_el1_irq_or_nmi
@@ -544,8 +544,10 @@  alternative_endif
 	ldr	x24, [tsk, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT]	// get preempt count
 alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING
 	/*
-	 * DA_F were cleared at start of handling. If anything is set in DAIF,
-	 * we come back from an NMI, so skip preemption
+	 * DA were cleared at start of handling, and IF are cleared by
+	 * the GIC irqchip driver using gic_arch_enable_irqs() for
+	 * normal IRQs. If anything is set, it means we come back from
+	 * an NMI instead of a normal IRQ, so skip preemption
 	 */
 	mrs	x0, daif
 	orr	x24, x24, x0
@@ -562,7 +564,7 @@  alternative_else_nop_endif
 	.macro el0_interrupt_handler, handler:req
 	gic_prio_irq_setup pmr=x20, tmp=x0
 	user_exit_irqoff
-	enable_da_f
+	enable_da

 	tbz	x22, #55, 1f
 	bl	do_el0_irq_bp_hardening
@@ -763,7 +765,7 @@  el0_error_naked:
 	mov	x0, sp
 	mov	x1, x25
 	bl	do_serror
-	enable_da_f
+	enable_da
 	b	ret_to_user
 SYM_CODE_END(el0_error)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 6616486a58fe..34ec400288d0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@  static void noinstr __cpu_do_idle_irqprio(void)
 	unsigned long daif_bits;

 	daif_bits = read_sysreg(daif);
-	write_sysreg(daif_bits | PSR_I_BIT, daif);
+	write_sysreg(daif_bits | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT, daif);

 	/*
 	 * Unmask PMR before going idle to make sure interrupts can
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index ad00f99ee9b0..9dee8a17b1ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@  static void init_gic_priority_masking(void)
 	cpuflags = read_sysreg(daif);

 	WARN_ON(!(cpuflags & PSR_I_BIT));
+	WARN_ON(!(cpuflags & PSR_F_BIT));

 	gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
 }