diff mbox series

Update 'make fuzz-all' docs to reflect modern clang

Message ID pull.889.git.1614514959347.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series Update 'make fuzz-all' docs to reflect modern clang | expand

Commit Message

Andrzej Hunt Feb. 28, 2021, 12:22 p.m. UTC
From: Andrzej Hunt <ajrhunt@google.com>

Clang no longer produces a libFuzzer.a, instead you can include
libFuzzer by using -fsanitize=fuzzer. Therefore we should use
that in the example command for building fuzzers.

I happen to have tested with LLVM 11 - however -fsanitize=fuzzer appears to
work in a wide range of reasonably modern clangs.

(On my system what used to be libFuzzer.a now lives under the following path,
 which is tricky albeit not impossible for a novice such as myself to find:
/usr/lib64/clang/11.0.0/lib/linux/libclang_rt.fuzzer-x86_64.a )

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hunt <ajrhunt@google.com>
---
    Update 'make fuzz-all' docs to reflect modern clang
    
    I would like to update the examples for 'make fuzz-all' to make it
    easier to build fuzzers locally.
    
    This change should make it easier for the uninitiated to build fuzzers
    locally without first having to figure out what LIB_FUZZING_ENGINE is
    for.
    
    ATB, Andrzej

Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-889%2Fahunt%2Ffuzz-docs-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-889/ahunt/fuzz-docs-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/889

 Makefile | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


base-commit: 225365fb5195e804274ab569ac3cc4919451dc7f

Comments

Josh Steadmon March 1, 2021, 10:39 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2021.02.28 12:22, Andrzej Hunt via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Andrzej Hunt <ajrhunt@google.com>
> 
> Clang no longer produces a libFuzzer.a, instead you can include
> libFuzzer by using -fsanitize=fuzzer. Therefore we should use
> that in the example command for building fuzzers.
> 
> I happen to have tested with LLVM 11 - however -fsanitize=fuzzer appears to
> work in a wide range of reasonably modern clangs.
> 
> (On my system what used to be libFuzzer.a now lives under the following path,
>  which is tricky albeit not impossible for a novice such as myself to find:
> /usr/lib64/clang/11.0.0/lib/linux/libclang_rt.fuzzer-x86_64.a )
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hunt <ajrhunt@google.com>
> ---
>     Update 'make fuzz-all' docs to reflect modern clang
>     
>     I would like to update the examples for 'make fuzz-all' to make it
>     easier to build fuzzers locally.
>     
>     This change should make it easier for the uninitiated to build fuzzers
>     locally without first having to figure out what LIB_FUZZING_ENGINE is
>     for.
>     
>     ATB, Andrzej

Thanks for taking a look at this! This looked correct to me, but when I
tried to run the fuzzers I got an error about
"-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc-guard" not being supported any longer.
Looking at the LLVM 11.0.0 docs [1], I see that it recommends using
"-fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link" instead (the "-no-link" is because we're
also building executables that have their own main()).

So we'd also want to change CFLAGS to
"-fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link,address".

[1]: https://releases.llvm.org/11.0.0/docs/LibFuzzer.html#fuzzer-usage
Andrzej Hunt March 4, 2021, 3:26 p.m. UTC | #2
On 01/03/2021 23:39, Josh Steadmon wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look at this! This looked correct to me, but when I
> tried to run the fuzzers I got an error about
> "-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc-guard" not being supported any longer.

Oops, I realised I was accidentally using clang 7 (instead of 11) 
locally. I can reproduce the same error with my copy of clang-11. Thanks 
for catching this!

> Looking at the LLVM 11.0.0 docs [1], I see that it recommends using
> "-fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link" instead (the "-no-link" is because we're
> also building executables that have their own main()).
> 
> So we'd also want to change CFLAGS to
> "-fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link,address".

I will fix this too!

I suspect that when I built without fuzzer-no-link, the fuzzer binaries 
included libFuzzer, but were missing whatever fuzzing-related
instrumentation clang should have added. (Fortunately oss-fuzz seems to
be adding this to the CFLAGS automatically [1].)

[1] 
https://oss-fuzz-build-logs.storage.googleapis.com/log-74f40f33-f384-475b-b141-0e44afb272f5.txt
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 9b1bde2e0e64..9f8f459f87b4 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -3291,11 +3291,11 @@  cover_db_html: cover_db
 # are not necessarily appropriate for general builds, and that vary greatly
 # depending on the compiler version used.
 #
-# An example command to build against libFuzzer from LLVM 4.0.0:
+# An example command to build against libFuzzer from LLVM 11.0.0:
 #
 # make CC=clang CXX=clang++ \
 #      CFLAGS="-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc-guard -fsanitize=address" \
-#      LIB_FUZZING_ENGINE=/usr/lib/llvm-4.0/lib/libFuzzer.a \
+#      LIB_FUZZING_ENGINE=-fsanitize=fuzzer \
 #      fuzz-all
 #
 FUZZ_CXXFLAGS ?= $(CFLAGS)