diff mbox series

[v2] i386: Add missing cpu feature bits in EPYC-Rome model

Message ID 161478622280.16275.6399866734509127420.stgit@bmoger-ubuntu (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2] i386: Add missing cpu feature bits in EPYC-Rome model | expand

Commit Message

Babu Moger March 3, 2021, 3:45 p.m. UTC
Found the following cpu feature bits missing from EPYC-Rome model.
ibrs    : Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation
ssbd    : Speculative Store Bypass Disable

These new features will be added in EPYC-Rome-v2. The -cpu help output
after the change.

x86 EPYC-Rome             (alias configured by machine type)
x86 EPYC-Rome-v1          AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
x86 EPYC-Rome-v2          AMD EPYC-Rome Processor

Reported-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com>
---
v2: Model-id remains same between EPYC-Rome-v1 and EPYC-Rome-v2.
    Removed model-id in the patch.

 target/i386/cpu.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

Comments

David Edmondson March 3, 2021, 4:22 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wednesday, 2021-03-03 at 09:45:30 -06, Babu Moger wrote:

> Found the following cpu feature bits missing from EPYC-Rome model.
> ibrs    : Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation
> ssbd    : Speculative Store Bypass Disable
>
> These new features will be added in EPYC-Rome-v2. The -cpu help output
> after the change.
>
> x86 EPYC-Rome             (alias configured by machine type)
> x86 EPYC-Rome-v1          AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
> x86 EPYC-Rome-v2          AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
>
> Reported-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com>

Reviewed-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>

> ---
> v2: Model-id remains same between EPYC-Rome-v1 and EPYC-Rome-v2.
>     Removed model-id in the patch.
>
>  target/i386/cpu.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 6a53446e6a..30e7188b0e 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -4179,6 +4179,18 @@ static X86CPUDefinition builtin_x86_defs[] = {
>          .xlevel = 0x8000001E,
>          .model_id = "AMD EPYC-Rome Processor",
>          .cache_info = &epyc_rome_cache_info,
> +        .versions = (X86CPUVersionDefinition[]) {
> +            { .version = 1 },
> +            {
> +                .version = 2,
> +                .props = (PropValue[]) {
> +                    { "ibrs", "on" },
> +                    { "amd-ssbd", "on" },
> +                    { /* end of list */ }
> +                }
> +            },
> +            { /* end of list */ }
> +        }
>      },
>      {
>          .name = "EPYC-Milan",

dme.
Babu Moger April 8, 2021, 3:28 p.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 3:06 AM
> To: david.edmondson@oracle.com
> Cc: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@amd.com>; Paolo Bonzini
> <pbonzini@redhat.com>; Richard Henderson
> <richard.henderson@linaro.org>; Eduardo Habkost
> <ehabkost@redhat.com>; pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i386: Add missing cpu feature bits in EPYC-Rome
> model
> 
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 5:24 PM <david.edmondson@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, 2021-03-03 at 09:45:30 -06, Babu Moger wrote:
> >
> > > Found the following cpu feature bits missing from EPYC-Rome model.
> > > ibrs    : Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation
> > > ssbd    : Speculative Store Bypass Disable
> > >
> > > These new features will be added in EPYC-Rome-v2. The -cpu help
> > > output after the change.
> > >
> > > x86 EPYC-Rome             (alias configured by machine type)
> > > x86 EPYC-Rome-v1          AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
> > > x86 EPYC-Rome-v2          AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
> 
> Hi,
> this change/discussion seems as it was good back then but I realized it wasn't
> applied in git yet.
> Was there a different thread discussing what holds it back that I could not yet
> find?
> Since we are already in v6.0.0-rc1 the window to get it in shrinks, so I wanted
> to give this a gentle ping.

Eduardo,
 Do you have any concerns with these patches?  It is also fixing another
problem reported here.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1915063
Can you please pull these changes?
Thanks
Babu
Eduardo Habkost April 8, 2021, 8:46 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:28:21AM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 3:06 AM
> > To: david.edmondson@oracle.com
> > Cc: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@amd.com>; Paolo Bonzini
> > <pbonzini@redhat.com>; Richard Henderson
> > <richard.henderson@linaro.org>; Eduardo Habkost
> > <ehabkost@redhat.com>; pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i386: Add missing cpu feature bits in EPYC-Rome
> > model
> > 
> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 5:24 PM <david.edmondson@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, 2021-03-03 at 09:45:30 -06, Babu Moger wrote:
> > >
> > > > Found the following cpu feature bits missing from EPYC-Rome model.
> > > > ibrs    : Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation
> > > > ssbd    : Speculative Store Bypass Disable
> > > >
> > > > These new features will be added in EPYC-Rome-v2. The -cpu help
> > > > output after the change.
> > > >
> > > > x86 EPYC-Rome             (alias configured by machine type)
> > > > x86 EPYC-Rome-v1          AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
> > > > x86 EPYC-Rome-v2          AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > this change/discussion seems as it was good back then but I realized it wasn't
> > applied in git yet.
> > Was there a different thread discussing what holds it back that I could not yet
> > find?
> > Since we are already in v6.0.0-rc1 the window to get it in shrinks, so I wanted
> > to give this a gentle ping.
> 
> Eduardo,
>  Do you have any concerns with these patches?  It is also fixing another
> problem reported here.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1915063
> Can you please pull these changes?

I'm so sorry for missing this when it was submitted in March.
I'm queueing it right now and I'm going to submit a pull request
very soon, for -rc4.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 6a53446e6a..30e7188b0e 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -4179,6 +4179,18 @@  static X86CPUDefinition builtin_x86_defs[] = {
         .xlevel = 0x8000001E,
         .model_id = "AMD EPYC-Rome Processor",
         .cache_info = &epyc_rome_cache_info,
+        .versions = (X86CPUVersionDefinition[]) {
+            { .version = 1 },
+            {
+                .version = 2,
+                .props = (PropValue[]) {
+                    { "ibrs", "on" },
+                    { "amd-ssbd", "on" },
+                    { /* end of list */ }
+                }
+            },
+            { /* end of list */ }
+        }
     },
     {
         .name = "EPYC-Milan",