Message ID | 20210317181249.1062995-1-badhri@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 86629e098a077922438efa98dc80917604dfd317 |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] usb: typec: tcpm: Invoke power_supply_changed for tcpm-source-psy- | expand |
On 17 March 2021 18:13, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > tcpm-source-psy- does not invoke power_supply_changed API when > one of the published power supply properties is changed. > power_supply_changed needs to be called to notify > userspace clients(uevents) and kernel clients. > > Fixes: f2a8aa053c176("typec: tcpm: Represent source supply through > power_supply") > Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com> > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> > --- > Changes since V1: > - Fixed commit message as per Guenter's suggestion > - Added Reviewed-by tags > - cc'ed stable > --- > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > index 11d0c40bc47d..e8936ea17f80 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > @@ -945,6 +945,7 @@ static int tcpm_set_current_limit(struct tcpm_port *port, > u32 max_ma, u32 mv) > > port->supply_voltage = mv; > port->current_limit = max_ma; > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > > if (port->tcpc->set_current_limit) > ret = port->tcpc->set_current_limit(port->tcpc, max_ma, mv); > @@ -2931,6 +2932,7 @@ static int tcpm_pd_select_pdo(struct tcpm_port *port, > int *sink_pdo, > > port->pps_data.supported = false; > port->usb_type = POWER_SUPPLY_USB_TYPE_PD; > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > > /* > * Select the source PDO providing the most power which has a > @@ -2955,6 +2957,7 @@ static int tcpm_pd_select_pdo(struct tcpm_port *port, > int *sink_pdo, > port->pps_data.supported = true; > port->usb_type = > POWER_SUPPLY_USB_TYPE_PD_PPS; > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > } > continue; > default: > @@ -3112,6 +3115,7 @@ static unsigned int tcpm_pd_select_pps_apdo(struct > tcpm_port *port) > port->pps_data.out_volt)); > port->pps_data.op_curr = min(port->pps_data.max_curr, > port->pps_data.op_curr); > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > } > > return src_pdo; Regarding selecting PDOs or PPS APDOs, surely we should only notify of a change when we reach SNK_READY which means a new contract has been established? Until that point it's possible any requested change could be rejected so why inform clients before we know the settings have taken effect? I could be missing something here as it's been a little while since I delved into this, but this doesn't seem to make sense to me. > @@ -3347,6 +3351,7 @@ static int tcpm_set_charge(struct tcpm_port *port, bool > charge) > return ret; > } > port->vbus_charge = charge; > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > return 0; > } > > @@ -3530,6 +3535,7 @@ static void tcpm_reset_port(struct tcpm_port *port) > port->try_src_count = 0; > port->try_snk_count = 0; > port->usb_type = POWER_SUPPLY_USB_TYPE_C; > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); This is already taken care of at the end of this function, isn't it? > port->nr_sink_caps = 0; > port->sink_cap_done = false; > if (port->tcpc->enable_frs) > @@ -5957,7 +5963,7 @@ static int tcpm_psy_set_prop(struct power_supply > *psy, > ret = -EINVAL; > break; > } > - > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > return ret; > } > > @@ -6110,6 +6116,7 @@ struct tcpm_port *tcpm_register_port(struct device > *dev, struct tcpc_dev *tcpc) > err = devm_tcpm_psy_register(port); > if (err) > goto out_role_sw_put; > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > > port->typec_port = typec_register_port(port->dev, &port->typec_caps); > if (IS_ERR(port->typec_port)) { > -- > 2.31.0.rc2.261.g7f71774620-goog
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 8:26 AM Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com> wrote: > > On 17 March 2021 18:13, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > > > tcpm-source-psy- does not invoke power_supply_changed API when > > one of the published power supply properties is changed. > > power_supply_changed needs to be called to notify > > userspace clients(uevents) and kernel clients. > > > > Fixes: f2a8aa053c176("typec: tcpm: Represent source supply through > > power_supply") > > Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com> > > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > > Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > Changes since V1: > > - Fixed commit message as per Guenter's suggestion > > - Added Reviewed-by tags > > - cc'ed stable > > --- > > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 9 ++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > > index 11d0c40bc47d..e8936ea17f80 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > > @@ -945,6 +945,7 @@ static int tcpm_set_current_limit(struct tcpm_port *port, > > u32 max_ma, u32 mv) > > > > port->supply_voltage = mv; > > port->current_limit = max_ma; > > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > > > > if (port->tcpc->set_current_limit) > > ret = port->tcpc->set_current_limit(port->tcpc, max_ma, mv); > > @@ -2931,6 +2932,7 @@ static int tcpm_pd_select_pdo(struct tcpm_port *port, > > int *sink_pdo, > > > > port->pps_data.supported = false; > > port->usb_type = POWER_SUPPLY_USB_TYPE_PD; > > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > > > > /* > > * Select the source PDO providing the most power which has a > > @@ -2955,6 +2957,7 @@ static int tcpm_pd_select_pdo(struct tcpm_port *port, > > int *sink_pdo, > > port->pps_data.supported = true; > > port->usb_type = > > POWER_SUPPLY_USB_TYPE_PD_PPS; > > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > > } > > continue; > > default: > > @@ -3112,6 +3115,7 @@ static unsigned int tcpm_pd_select_pps_apdo(struct > > tcpm_port *port) > > port->pps_data.out_volt)); > > port->pps_data.op_curr = min(port->pps_data.max_curr, > > port->pps_data.op_curr); > > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > > } > > > > return src_pdo; > > Regarding selecting PDOs or PPS APDOs, surely we should only notify of a change > when we reach SNK_READY which means a new contract has been established? Until > that point it's possible any requested change could be rejected so why inform > clients before we know the settings have taken effect? I could be missing > something here as it's been a little while since I delved into this, but this > doesn't seem to make sense to me. I was trying to keep the power_supply_changed call close to the variables which are used to infer the power supply property values. Since port->pps_data.max_curr is already updated here and that's used to infer the CURRENT_MAX a client could still read this before the request goes through right ? > > > @@ -3347,6 +3351,7 @@ static int tcpm_set_charge(struct tcpm_port *port, bool > > charge) > > return ret; > > } > > port->vbus_charge = charge; > > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > > return 0; > > } > > > > @@ -3530,6 +3535,7 @@ static void tcpm_reset_port(struct tcpm_port *port) > > port->try_src_count = 0; > > port->try_snk_count = 0; > > port->usb_type = POWER_SUPPLY_USB_TYPE_C; > > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > > This is already taken care of at the end of this function, isn't it? I thought I deleted that. Looks like I didn't. Will send in a patch to remove that. Will wait for what we decide for the PPS case so that I can send in both in the same patch. Thanks, Badhri > > > port->nr_sink_caps = 0; > > port->sink_cap_done = false; > > if (port->tcpc->enable_frs) > > @@ -5957,7 +5963,7 @@ static int tcpm_psy_set_prop(struct power_supply > > *psy, > > ret = -EINVAL; > > break; > > } > > - > > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > > return ret; > > } > > > > @@ -6110,6 +6116,7 @@ struct tcpm_port *tcpm_register_port(struct device > > *dev, struct tcpc_dev *tcpc) > > err = devm_tcpm_psy_register(port); > > if (err) > > goto out_role_sw_put; > > + power_supply_changed(port->psy); > > > > port->typec_port = typec_register_port(port->dev, &port->typec_caps); > > if (IS_ERR(port->typec_port)) { > > -- > > 2.31.0.rc2.261.g7f71774620-goog >
On 18 March 2021 20:40, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > > Regarding selecting PDOs or PPS APDOs, surely we should only notify of a > change > > when we reach SNK_READY which means a new contract has been established? > Until > > that point it's possible any requested change could be rejected so why inform > > clients before we know the settings have taken effect? I could be missing > > something here as it's been a little while since I delved into this, but this > > doesn't seem to make sense to me. > > I was trying to keep the power_supply_changed call close to the > variables which are used to infer the power supply property values. > Since port->pps_data.max_curr is already updated here and that's used > to infer the CURRENT_MAX a client could still read this before the > request goes through right ? Actually that's fair but I think the problem here relates to 'max_curr' not being reset if the SRC rejects our request when we're swapping between one PPS APDO and another PPS APDO. I think the 'max_curr' value should be reverted back to the value for the existing PPS APDO we were already using. I suspect the same might be true of 'min_volt' and 'max_volt' as well, now I look at it. It might actually be prudent to have pending PPS data based on a request, which is only committed as active once ACCEPT has been received. Regarding power_supply_changed() though, I still think we should only notify of a change when the requested change has been accepted by the source, in relation to these values as they should reflect the real, in-use voltage and current values.
Hi Adam, Just sent out a patch stack https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-usb/list/?series=461087 to address the issue that you mentioned here. Thanks, Badhri On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 6:43 PM Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com> wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > Just sent out a patch stack https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-usb/list/?series=461087 > to address the issue that you mentioned here. > > Thanks, > Badhri > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:32 AM Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com> wrote: >> >> On 18 March 2021 20:40, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: >> >> > > Regarding selecting PDOs or PPS APDOs, surely we should only notify of a >> > change >> > > when we reach SNK_READY which means a new contract has been established? >> > Until >> > > that point it's possible any requested change could be rejected so why inform >> > > clients before we know the settings have taken effect? I could be missing >> > > something here as it's been a little while since I delved into this, but this >> > > doesn't seem to make sense to me. >> > >> > I was trying to keep the power_supply_changed call close to the >> > variables which are used to infer the power supply property values. >> > Since port->pps_data.max_curr is already updated here and that's used >> > to infer the CURRENT_MAX a client could still read this before the >> > request goes through right ? >> >> Actually that's fair but I think the problem here relates to 'max_curr' not >> being reset if the SRC rejects our request when we're swapping between one PPS >> APDO and another PPS APDO. I think the 'max_curr' value should be reverted back >> to the value for the existing PPS APDO we were already using. I suspect the same >> might be true of 'min_volt' and 'max_volt' as well, now I look at it. It might >> actually be prudent to have pending PPS data based on a request, which is only >> committed as active once ACCEPT has been received. >> >> Regarding power_supply_changed() though, I still think we should only notify of >> a change when the requested change has been accepted by the source, in relation >> to these values as they should reflect the real, in-use voltage and current >> values. >>
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c index 11d0c40bc47d..e8936ea17f80 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c @@ -945,6 +945,7 @@ static int tcpm_set_current_limit(struct tcpm_port *port, u32 max_ma, u32 mv) port->supply_voltage = mv; port->current_limit = max_ma; + power_supply_changed(port->psy); if (port->tcpc->set_current_limit) ret = port->tcpc->set_current_limit(port->tcpc, max_ma, mv); @@ -2931,6 +2932,7 @@ static int tcpm_pd_select_pdo(struct tcpm_port *port, int *sink_pdo, port->pps_data.supported = false; port->usb_type = POWER_SUPPLY_USB_TYPE_PD; + power_supply_changed(port->psy); /* * Select the source PDO providing the most power which has a @@ -2955,6 +2957,7 @@ static int tcpm_pd_select_pdo(struct tcpm_port *port, int *sink_pdo, port->pps_data.supported = true; port->usb_type = POWER_SUPPLY_USB_TYPE_PD_PPS; + power_supply_changed(port->psy); } continue; default: @@ -3112,6 +3115,7 @@ static unsigned int tcpm_pd_select_pps_apdo(struct tcpm_port *port) port->pps_data.out_volt)); port->pps_data.op_curr = min(port->pps_data.max_curr, port->pps_data.op_curr); + power_supply_changed(port->psy); } return src_pdo; @@ -3347,6 +3351,7 @@ static int tcpm_set_charge(struct tcpm_port *port, bool charge) return ret; } port->vbus_charge = charge; + power_supply_changed(port->psy); return 0; } @@ -3530,6 +3535,7 @@ static void tcpm_reset_port(struct tcpm_port *port) port->try_src_count = 0; port->try_snk_count = 0; port->usb_type = POWER_SUPPLY_USB_TYPE_C; + power_supply_changed(port->psy); port->nr_sink_caps = 0; port->sink_cap_done = false; if (port->tcpc->enable_frs) @@ -5957,7 +5963,7 @@ static int tcpm_psy_set_prop(struct power_supply *psy, ret = -EINVAL; break; } - + power_supply_changed(port->psy); return ret; } @@ -6110,6 +6116,7 @@ struct tcpm_port *tcpm_register_port(struct device *dev, struct tcpc_dev *tcpc) err = devm_tcpm_psy_register(port); if (err) goto out_role_sw_put; + power_supply_changed(port->psy); port->typec_port = typec_register_port(port->dev, &port->typec_caps); if (IS_ERR(port->typec_port)) {