| Message ID | 20210318135223.1342795-3-ckuehl@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | virtiofs: split requests that exceed virtqueue size | expand |
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:52:22AM -0500, Connor Kuehl wrote: > If an incoming FUSE request can't fit on the virtqueue, the request is > placed onto a workqueue so a worker can try to resubmit it later where > there will (hopefully) be space for it next time. > > This is fine for requests that aren't larger than a virtqueue's maximum > capacity. However, if a request's size exceeds the maximum capacity of > the virtqueue (even if the virtqueue is empty), it will be doomed to a > life of being placed on the workqueue, removed, discovered it won't fit, > and placed on the workqueue yet again. > > Furthermore, from section 2.6.5.3.1 (Driver Requirements: Indirect > Descriptors) of the virtio spec: > > "A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue > Size of the device." > > To fix this, limit the number of pages FUSE will use for an overall > request. This way, each request can realistically fit on the virtqueue > when it is decomposed into a scattergather list and avoid violating > section 2.6.5.3.1 of the virtio spec. I removed the conditional compilation and renamed the limit. Also made virtio_fs_get_tree() bail out if it hit the WARN_ON(). Updated patch below. The virtio_ring patch in this series should probably go through the respective subsystem tree. Thanks, Miklos --- From: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> Subject: virtiofs: split requests that exceed virtqueue size Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:52:22 -0500 If an incoming FUSE request can't fit on the virtqueue, the request is placed onto a workqueue so a worker can try to resubmit it later where there will (hopefully) be space for it next time. This is fine for requests that aren't larger than a virtqueue's maximum capacity. However, if a request's size exceeds the maximum capacity of the virtqueue (even if the virtqueue is empty), it will be doomed to a life of being placed on the workqueue, removed, discovered it won't fit, and placed on the workqueue yet again. Furthermore, from section 2.6.5.3.1 (Driver Requirements: Indirect Descriptors) of the virtio spec: "A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue Size of the device." To fix this, limit the number of pages FUSE will use for an overall request. This way, each request can realistically fit on the virtqueue when it is decomposed into a scattergather list and avoid violating section 2.6.5.3.1 of the virtio spec. Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> --- fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 3 +++ fs/fuse/inode.c | 3 ++- fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h @@ -555,6 +555,9 @@ struct fuse_conn { /** Maxmum number of pages that can be used in a single request */ unsigned int max_pages; + /** Constrain ->max_pages to this value during feature negotiation */ + unsigned int max_pages_limit; + /** Input queue */ struct fuse_iqueue iq; --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c @@ -712,6 +712,7 @@ void fuse_conn_init(struct fuse_conn *fc fc->pid_ns = get_pid_ns(task_active_pid_ns(current)); fc->user_ns = get_user_ns(user_ns); fc->max_pages = FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ; + fc->max_pages_limit = FUSE_MAX_MAX_PAGES; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fc->mounts); list_add(&fm->fc_entry, &fc->mounts); @@ -1040,7 +1041,7 @@ static void process_init_reply(struct fu fc->abort_err = 1; if (arg->flags & FUSE_MAX_PAGES) { fc->max_pages = - min_t(unsigned int, FUSE_MAX_MAX_PAGES, + min_t(unsigned int, fc->max_pages_limit, max_t(unsigned int, arg->max_pages, 1)); } if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUSE_DAX) && --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ #include <linux/uio.h> #include "fuse_i.h" +/* Used to help calculate the FUSE connection's max_pages limit for a request's + * size. Parts of the struct fuse_req are sliced into scattergather lists in + * addition to the pages used, so this can help account for that overhead. + */ +#define FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD 4 + /* List of virtio-fs device instances and a lock for the list. Also provides * mutual exclusion in device removal and mounting path */ @@ -1413,9 +1419,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_ { struct virtio_fs *fs; struct super_block *sb; - struct fuse_conn *fc; + struct fuse_conn *fc = NULL; struct fuse_mount *fm; - int err; + unsigned int virtqueue_size; + int err = -EIO; /* This gets a reference on virtio_fs object. This ptr gets installed * in fc->iq->priv. Once fuse_conn is going away, it calls ->put() @@ -1427,6 +1434,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_ return -EINVAL; } + virtqueue_size = virtqueue_get_vring_size(fs->vqs[VQ_REQUEST].vq); + if (WARN_ON(virtqueue_size <= FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD)) + goto out_err; + err = -ENOMEM; fc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_conn), GFP_KERNEL); if (!fc) @@ -1442,6 +1453,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_ fc->delete_stale = true; fc->auto_submounts = true; + /* Tell FUSE to split requests that exceed the virtqueue's size */ + fc->max_pages_limit = min_t(unsigned int, fc->max_pages_limit, + virtqueue_size - FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD); + fsc->s_fs_info = fm; sb = sget_fc(fsc, virtio_fs_test_super, set_anon_super_fc); if (fsc->s_fs_info) {
On 3/18/21 10:17 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > I removed the conditional compilation and renamed the limit. Also made > virtio_fs_get_tree() bail out if it hit the WARN_ON(). Updated patch below. Thanks, Miklos. I think it looks better with those changes. > The virtio_ring patch in this series should probably go through the respective > subsystem tree. Makes sense. I've CC'd everyone that ./scripts/get_maintainers.pl suggested for that patch on this entire series as well. Should I resend patch #1 through just that subsystem to avoid confusion or wait to see if it gets picked out of this series? Thanks again, Connor
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:52:22AM -0500, Connor Kuehl wrote: > If an incoming FUSE request can't fit on the virtqueue, the request is > placed onto a workqueue so a worker can try to resubmit it later where > there will (hopefully) be space for it next time. > > This is fine for requests that aren't larger than a virtqueue's maximum > capacity. However, if a request's size exceeds the maximum capacity of > the virtqueue (even if the virtqueue is empty), it will be doomed to a > life of being placed on the workqueue, removed, discovered it won't fit, > and placed on the workqueue yet again. > > Furthermore, from section 2.6.5.3.1 (Driver Requirements: Indirect > Descriptors) of the virtio spec: > > "A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue > Size of the device." > > To fix this, limit the number of pages FUSE will use for an overall > request. This way, each request can realistically fit on the virtqueue > when it is decomposed into a scattergather list and avoid violating > section 2.6.5.3.1 of the virtio spec. Hi Connor, So as of now if a request is bigger than what virtqueue can support, it never gets dispatched and caller waits infinitely? So this patch will fix it by forcing fuse to split the request. That sounds good. [..] > diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c > index 8868ac31a3c0..a6ffba85d59a 100644 > --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c > +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c > @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ > #include <linux/uio.h> > #include "fuse_i.h" > > +/* Used to help calculate the FUSE connection's max_pages limit for a request's > + * size. Parts of the struct fuse_req are sliced into scattergather lists in > + * addition to the pages used, so this can help account for that overhead. > + */ > +#define FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD 4 How did yo arrive at this overhead. Is it following. - One sg element for fuse_in_header. - One sg element for input arguments. - One sg element for fuse_out_header. - One sg element for output args. Thanks Vivek
On 3/19/21 8:49 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:52:22AM -0500, Connor Kuehl wrote: >> If an incoming FUSE request can't fit on the virtqueue, the request is >> placed onto a workqueue so a worker can try to resubmit it later where >> there will (hopefully) be space for it next time. >> >> This is fine for requests that aren't larger than a virtqueue's maximum >> capacity. However, if a request's size exceeds the maximum capacity of >> the virtqueue (even if the virtqueue is empty), it will be doomed to a >> life of being placed on the workqueue, removed, discovered it won't fit, >> and placed on the workqueue yet again. >> >> Furthermore, from section 2.6.5.3.1 (Driver Requirements: Indirect >> Descriptors) of the virtio spec: >> >> "A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue >> Size of the device." >> >> To fix this, limit the number of pages FUSE will use for an overall >> request. This way, each request can realistically fit on the virtqueue >> when it is decomposed into a scattergather list and avoid violating >> section 2.6.5.3.1 of the virtio spec. > > Hi Connor, > > So as of now if a request is bigger than what virtqueue can support, > it never gets dispatched and caller waits infinitely? So this patch > will fix it by forcing fuse to split the request. That sounds good. Right, in theory. Certain configurations make it easier to avoid this from happening, such as using indirect descriptors; however, in that case, the virtio spec says even if indirect descriptors are used, the descriptor chain length shouldn't exceed the length of the queue's size anyways. So having FUSE split the request also helps to uphold that property. This is my reading of the potential looping problem: virtio_fs_wake_pending_and_unlock calls virtio_fs_enqueue_req calls virtqueue_add_sgs virtqueue_add_sgs can return -ENOSPC if there aren't enough descriptors available. This error gets propagated back down to virtio_fs_wake_pending_and_unlock which checks for this exact issue and places the request on a workqueue to retry submission later. Resubmission occurs in virtio_fs_request_dispatch_work, which does a similar dance, where if the request fails with -ENOSPC it just puts it back in the queue. However, for a sufficiently large request that would exceed the capacity of the virtqueue (even when empty), no amount of retrying will ever make it fit. > > > [..] >> diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c >> index 8868ac31a3c0..a6ffba85d59a 100644 >> --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c >> +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c >> @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ >> #include <linux/uio.h> >> #include "fuse_i.h" >> >> +/* Used to help calculate the FUSE connection's max_pages limit for a request's >> + * size. Parts of the struct fuse_req are sliced into scattergather lists in >> + * addition to the pages used, so this can help account for that overhead. >> + */ >> +#define FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD 4 > > How did yo arrive at this overhead. Is it following. > > - One sg element for fuse_in_header. > - One sg element for input arguments. > - One sg element for fuse_out_header. > - One sg element for output args. Yes, that's exactly how I got to that number. Connor
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:52:14AM -0500, Connor Kuehl wrote: > On 3/18/21 10:17 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > I removed the conditional compilation and renamed the limit. Also made > > virtio_fs_get_tree() bail out if it hit the WARN_ON(). Updated patch below. > > Thanks, Miklos. I think it looks better with those changes. > > > The virtio_ring patch in this series should probably go through the respective > > subsystem tree. > > Makes sense. I've CC'd everyone that ./scripts/get_maintainers.pl suggested > for that patch on this entire series as well. Should I resend patch #1 > through just that subsystem to avoid confusion or wait to see if it gets > picked out of this series? Yes pls post separately. Thanks! > Thanks again, > > Connor
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:52:22AM -0500, Connor Kuehl wrote: > If an incoming FUSE request can't fit on the virtqueue, the request is > placed onto a workqueue so a worker can try to resubmit it later where > there will (hopefully) be space for it next time. > > This is fine for requests that aren't larger than a virtqueue's maximum > capacity. However, if a request's size exceeds the maximum capacity of > the virtqueue (even if the virtqueue is empty), it will be doomed to a > life of being placed on the workqueue, removed, discovered it won't fit, > and placed on the workqueue yet again. > > Furthermore, from section 2.6.5.3.1 (Driver Requirements: Indirect > Descriptors) of the virtio spec: > > "A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue > Size of the device." > > To fix this, limit the number of pages FUSE will use for an overall > request. This way, each request can realistically fit on the virtqueue > when it is decomposed into a scattergather list and avoid violating > section 2.6.5.3.1 of the virtio spec. > > Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> > --- > fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 5 +++++ > fs/fuse/inode.c | 7 +++++++ > fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+) Nice that FUSE already has max_pages :-). Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 04:17:51PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:52:22AM -0500, Connor Kuehl wrote: > > If an incoming FUSE request can't fit on the virtqueue, the request is > > placed onto a workqueue so a worker can try to resubmit it later where > > there will (hopefully) be space for it next time. > > > > This is fine for requests that aren't larger than a virtqueue's maximum > > capacity. However, if a request's size exceeds the maximum capacity of > > the virtqueue (even if the virtqueue is empty), it will be doomed to a > > life of being placed on the workqueue, removed, discovered it won't fit, > > and placed on the workqueue yet again. > > > > Furthermore, from section 2.6.5.3.1 (Driver Requirements: Indirect > > Descriptors) of the virtio spec: > > > > "A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue > > Size of the device." > > > > To fix this, limit the number of pages FUSE will use for an overall > > request. This way, each request can realistically fit on the virtqueue > > when it is decomposed into a scattergather list and avoid violating > > section 2.6.5.3.1 of the virtio spec. > > I removed the conditional compilation and renamed the limit. Also made > virtio_fs_get_tree() bail out if it hit the WARN_ON(). Updated patch below. > > The virtio_ring patch in this series should probably go through the respective > subsystem tree. > > > Thanks, > Miklos > > --- > From: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> > Subject: virtiofs: split requests that exceed virtqueue size > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:52:22 -0500 > > If an incoming FUSE request can't fit on the virtqueue, the request is > placed onto a workqueue so a worker can try to resubmit it later where > there will (hopefully) be space for it next time. > > This is fine for requests that aren't larger than a virtqueue's maximum > capacity. However, if a request's size exceeds the maximum capacity of the > virtqueue (even if the virtqueue is empty), it will be doomed to a life of > being placed on the workqueue, removed, discovered it won't fit, and placed > on the workqueue yet again. > > Furthermore, from section 2.6.5.3.1 (Driver Requirements: Indirect > Descriptors) of the virtio spec: > > "A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue > Size of the device." > > To fix this, limit the number of pages FUSE will use for an overall > request. This way, each request can realistically fit on the virtqueue > when it is decomposed into a scattergather list and avoid violating section > 2.6.5.3.1 of the virtio spec. > > Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> > --- Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Vivek > fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 3 +++ > fs/fuse/inode.c | 3 ++- > fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h > +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h > @@ -555,6 +555,9 @@ struct fuse_conn { > /** Maxmum number of pages that can be used in a single request */ > unsigned int max_pages; > > + /** Constrain ->max_pages to this value during feature negotiation */ > + unsigned int max_pages_limit; > + > /** Input queue */ > struct fuse_iqueue iq; > > --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c > +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c > @@ -712,6 +712,7 @@ void fuse_conn_init(struct fuse_conn *fc > fc->pid_ns = get_pid_ns(task_active_pid_ns(current)); > fc->user_ns = get_user_ns(user_ns); > fc->max_pages = FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ; > + fc->max_pages_limit = FUSE_MAX_MAX_PAGES; > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fc->mounts); > list_add(&fm->fc_entry, &fc->mounts); > @@ -1040,7 +1041,7 @@ static void process_init_reply(struct fu > fc->abort_err = 1; > if (arg->flags & FUSE_MAX_PAGES) { > fc->max_pages = > - min_t(unsigned int, FUSE_MAX_MAX_PAGES, > + min_t(unsigned int, fc->max_pages_limit, > max_t(unsigned int, arg->max_pages, 1)); > } > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUSE_DAX) && > --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c > +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c > @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ > #include <linux/uio.h> > #include "fuse_i.h" > > +/* Used to help calculate the FUSE connection's max_pages limit for a request's > + * size. Parts of the struct fuse_req are sliced into scattergather lists in > + * addition to the pages used, so this can help account for that overhead. > + */ > +#define FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD 4 > + > /* List of virtio-fs device instances and a lock for the list. Also provides > * mutual exclusion in device removal and mounting path > */ > @@ -1413,9 +1419,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_ > { > struct virtio_fs *fs; > struct super_block *sb; > - struct fuse_conn *fc; > + struct fuse_conn *fc = NULL; > struct fuse_mount *fm; > - int err; > + unsigned int virtqueue_size; > + int err = -EIO; > > /* This gets a reference on virtio_fs object. This ptr gets installed > * in fc->iq->priv. Once fuse_conn is going away, it calls ->put() > @@ -1427,6 +1434,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_ > return -EINVAL; > } > > + virtqueue_size = virtqueue_get_vring_size(fs->vqs[VQ_REQUEST].vq); > + if (WARN_ON(virtqueue_size <= FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD)) > + goto out_err; > + > err = -ENOMEM; > fc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_conn), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!fc) > @@ -1442,6 +1453,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_ > fc->delete_stale = true; > fc->auto_submounts = true; > > + /* Tell FUSE to split requests that exceed the virtqueue's size */ > + fc->max_pages_limit = min_t(unsigned int, fc->max_pages_limit, > + virtqueue_size - FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD); > + > fsc->s_fs_info = fm; > sb = sget_fc(fsc, virtio_fs_test_super, set_anon_super_fc); > if (fsc->s_fs_info) { >
On 3/18/21 10:17 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > I removed the conditional compilation and renamed the limit. Also made > virtio_fs_get_tree() bail out if it hit the WARN_ON(). Updated patch below. Hi Miklos, Has this patch been queued? Connor > --- > From: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> > Subject: virtiofs: split requests that exceed virtqueue size > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:52:22 -0500 > > If an incoming FUSE request can't fit on the virtqueue, the request is > placed onto a workqueue so a worker can try to resubmit it later where > there will (hopefully) be space for it next time. > > This is fine for requests that aren't larger than a virtqueue's maximum > capacity. However, if a request's size exceeds the maximum capacity of the > virtqueue (even if the virtqueue is empty), it will be doomed to a life of > being placed on the workqueue, removed, discovered it won't fit, and placed > on the workqueue yet again. > > Furthermore, from section 2.6.5.3.1 (Driver Requirements: Indirect > Descriptors) of the virtio spec: > > "A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue > Size of the device." > > To fix this, limit the number of pages FUSE will use for an overall > request. This way, each request can realistically fit on the virtqueue > when it is decomposed into a scattergather list and avoid violating section > 2.6.5.3.1 of the virtio spec. > > Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> > --- > fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 3 +++ > fs/fuse/inode.c | 3 ++- > fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h > +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h > @@ -555,6 +555,9 @@ struct fuse_conn { > /** Maxmum number of pages that can be used in a single request */ > unsigned int max_pages; > > + /** Constrain ->max_pages to this value during feature negotiation */ > + unsigned int max_pages_limit; > + > /** Input queue */ > struct fuse_iqueue iq; > > --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c > +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c > @@ -712,6 +712,7 @@ void fuse_conn_init(struct fuse_conn *fc > fc->pid_ns = get_pid_ns(task_active_pid_ns(current)); > fc->user_ns = get_user_ns(user_ns); > fc->max_pages = FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ; > + fc->max_pages_limit = FUSE_MAX_MAX_PAGES; > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fc->mounts); > list_add(&fm->fc_entry, &fc->mounts); > @@ -1040,7 +1041,7 @@ static void process_init_reply(struct fu > fc->abort_err = 1; > if (arg->flags & FUSE_MAX_PAGES) { > fc->max_pages = > - min_t(unsigned int, FUSE_MAX_MAX_PAGES, > + min_t(unsigned int, fc->max_pages_limit, > max_t(unsigned int, arg->max_pages, 1)); > } > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUSE_DAX) && > --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c > +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c > @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ > #include <linux/uio.h> > #include "fuse_i.h" > > +/* Used to help calculate the FUSE connection's max_pages limit for a request's > + * size. Parts of the struct fuse_req are sliced into scattergather lists in > + * addition to the pages used, so this can help account for that overhead. > + */ > +#define FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD 4 > + > /* List of virtio-fs device instances and a lock for the list. Also provides > * mutual exclusion in device removal and mounting path > */ > @@ -1413,9 +1419,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_ > { > struct virtio_fs *fs; > struct super_block *sb; > - struct fuse_conn *fc; > + struct fuse_conn *fc = NULL; > struct fuse_mount *fm; > - int err; > + unsigned int virtqueue_size; > + int err = -EIO; > > /* This gets a reference on virtio_fs object. This ptr gets installed > * in fc->iq->priv. Once fuse_conn is going away, it calls ->put() > @@ -1427,6 +1434,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_ > return -EINVAL; > } > > + virtqueue_size = virtqueue_get_vring_size(fs->vqs[VQ_REQUEST].vq); > + if (WARN_ON(virtqueue_size <= FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD)) > + goto out_err; > + > err = -ENOMEM; > fc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_conn), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!fc) > @@ -1442,6 +1453,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_ > fc->delete_stale = true; > fc->auto_submounts = true; > > + /* Tell FUSE to split requests that exceed the virtqueue's size */ > + fc->max_pages_limit = min_t(unsigned int, fc->max_pages_limit, > + virtqueue_size - FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD); > + > fsc->s_fs_info = fm; > sb = sget_fc(fsc, virtio_fs_test_super, set_anon_super_fc); > if (fsc->s_fs_info) { >
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 4:09 PM Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 3/18/21 10:17 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > I removed the conditional compilation and renamed the limit. Also made > > virtio_fs_get_tree() bail out if it hit the WARN_ON(). Updated patch below. > > Hi Miklos, > > Has this patch been queued? It's in my internal patch queue at the moment. Will push to fuse.git#for-next in a couple of days. Thanks, Miklos
On 3/24/21 10:30 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 4:09 PM Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 3/18/21 10:17 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >>> I removed the conditional compilation and renamed the limit. Also made >>> virtio_fs_get_tree() bail out if it hit the WARN_ON(). Updated patch below. >> >> Hi Miklos, >> >> Has this patch been queued? > > It's in my internal patch queue at the moment. Will push to > fuse.git#for-next in a couple of days. Cool! Thank you :-) Connor
diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h index 68cca8d4db6e..f0e4ee906464 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h @@ -555,6 +555,11 @@ struct fuse_conn { /** Maxmum number of pages that can be used in a single request */ unsigned int max_pages; +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VIRTIO_FS) + /** Constrain ->max_pages to this value during feature negotiation */ + unsigned int transport_capacity; +#endif + /** Input queue */ struct fuse_iqueue iq; diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c index b0e18b470e91..42cc72ba13d9 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c @@ -1058,6 +1058,13 @@ static void process_init_reply(struct fuse_mount *fm, struct fuse_args *args, fc->no_flock = 1; } +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VIRTIO_FS) + /* fuse_conn_init() sets this to zero for all others, this is + * explicitly set by virtio_fs. + */ + if (fc->transport_capacity) + fc->max_pages = min_t(unsigned int, fc->max_pages, fc->transport_capacity); +#endif fm->sb->s_bdi->ra_pages = min(fm->sb->s_bdi->ra_pages, ra_pages); fc->minor = arg->minor; diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c index 8868ac31a3c0..a6ffba85d59a 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ #include <linux/uio.h> #include "fuse_i.h" +/* Used to help calculate the FUSE connection's max_pages limit for a request's + * size. Parts of the struct fuse_req are sliced into scattergather lists in + * addition to the pages used, so this can help account for that overhead. + */ +#define FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD 4 + /* List of virtio-fs device instances and a lock for the list. Also provides * mutual exclusion in device removal and mounting path */ @@ -1408,6 +1414,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_context *fsc) struct super_block *sb; struct fuse_conn *fc; struct fuse_mount *fm; + unsigned int virtqueue_size; int err; /* This gets a reference on virtio_fs object. This ptr gets installed @@ -1435,6 +1442,13 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_context *fsc) fc->delete_stale = true; fc->auto_submounts = true; + /* Tell FUSE to split requests that exceed the virtqueue's size */ + virtqueue_size = virtqueue_get_vring_size(fs->vqs[VQ_REQUEST].vq); + WARN_ON(virtqueue_size <= FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD); + fc->transport_capacity = min_t(unsigned int, + virtqueue_size - FUSE_HEADER_OVERHEAD, + FUSE_MAX_MAX_PAGES); + fsc->s_fs_info = fm; sb = sget_fc(fsc, virtio_fs_test_super, set_anon_super_fc); if (fsc->s_fs_info) {
If an incoming FUSE request can't fit on the virtqueue, the request is placed onto a workqueue so a worker can try to resubmit it later where there will (hopefully) be space for it next time. This is fine for requests that aren't larger than a virtqueue's maximum capacity. However, if a request's size exceeds the maximum capacity of the virtqueue (even if the virtqueue is empty), it will be doomed to a life of being placed on the workqueue, removed, discovered it won't fit, and placed on the workqueue yet again. Furthermore, from section 2.6.5.3.1 (Driver Requirements: Indirect Descriptors) of the virtio spec: "A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue Size of the device." To fix this, limit the number of pages FUSE will use for an overall request. This way, each request can realistically fit on the virtqueue when it is decomposed into a scattergather list and avoid violating section 2.6.5.3.1 of the virtio spec. Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> --- fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 5 +++++ fs/fuse/inode.c | 7 +++++++ fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)