Message ID | cover.1616971780.git.unixbhaskar@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | DMA: Mundane typo fixes | expand |
On 07:29 Mon 29 Mar 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >I really don't think these typo patchbomb are that useful. I'm all >for fixing typos when working with a subsystem, but I'm not sure these >patchbombs help anything. > I am sure you are holding the wrong end of the wand and grossly failing to understand. Anyway, I hope I give a heads up ...find "your way" to fix those damn thing...it's glaring.... >On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 05:22:56AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: >> This patch series fixes some trivial and rudimentary spellings in the COMMENT >> sections. >> >> Bhaskar Chowdhury (30): >> acpi-dma.c: Fix couple of typos >> altera-msgdma.c: Couple of typos fixed >> amba-pl08x.c: Fixed couple of typos >> bcm-sba-raid.c: Few typos fixed >> bcm2835-dma.c: Fix a typo >> idma64.c: Fix couple of typos >> iop-adma.c: Few typos fixed >> mv_xor.c: Fix a typo >> mv_xor.h: Fixed a typo >> mv_xor_v2.c: Fix a typo >> nbpfaxi.c: Fixed a typo >> of-dma.c: Fixed a typo >> s3c24xx-dma.c: Fix a typo >> Revert "s3c24xx-dma.c: Fix a typo" >> s3c24xx-dma.c: Few typos fixed >> st_fdma.h: Fix couple of typos >> ste_dma40_ll.h: Fix a typo >> tegra20-apb-dma.c: Fixed a typo >> xgene-dma.c: Few spello fixes >> at_hdmac.c: Quite a few spello fixes >> owl-dma.c: Fix a typo >> at_hdmac_regs.h: Couple of typo fixes >> dma-jz4780.c: Fix a typo >> Kconfig: Change Synopsys to Synopsis >> ste_dma40.c: Few spello fixes >> dw-axi-dmac-platform.c: Few typos fixed >> dpaa2-qdma.c: Fix a typo >> usb-dmac.c: Fix a typo >> edma.c: Fix a typo >> xilinx_dma.c: Fix a typo >> >> drivers/dma/Kconfig | 8 ++++---- >> drivers/dma/acpi-dma.c | 4 ++-- >> drivers/dma/altera-msgdma.c | 4 ++-- >> drivers/dma/amba-pl08x.c | 4 ++-- >> drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 14 +++++++------- >> drivers/dma/at_hdmac_regs.h | 4 ++-- >> drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 8 ++++---- >> drivers/dma/bcm2835-dma.c | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c | 8 ++++---- >> drivers/dma/idma64.c | 4 ++-- >> drivers/dma/iop-adma.c | 6 +++--- >> drivers/dma/mv_xor.c | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/mv_xor.h | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/mv_xor_v2.c | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/nbpfaxi.c | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/of-dma.c | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/owl-dma.c | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/s3c24xx-dma.c | 6 +++--- >> drivers/dma/sh/shdmac.c | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/sh/usb-dmac.c | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/st_fdma.h | 4 ++-- >> drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c | 10 +++++----- >> drivers/dma/ste_dma40_ll.h | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/ti/edma.c | 2 +- >> drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c | 6 +++--- >> drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c | 2 +- >> 28 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.26.3 >---end quoted text---
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:25:11AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: > On 07:29 Mon 29 Mar 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I really don't think these typo patchbomb are that useful. I'm all > > for fixing typos when working with a subsystem, but I'm not sure these > > patchbombs help anything. > > > I am sure you are holding the wrong end of the wand and grossly failing to > understand. Please stop statements like this, it is not helpful and is doing nothing but ensure that your patches will not be looked at in the future. > Anyway, I hope I give a heads up ...find "your way" to fix those damn > thing...it's glaring.... There is no requirement that anyone accept patches that are sent to them. When you complain when receiving comments on them, that shows you do not wish to work with others. Sorry, but you are now on my local blacklist for a while, and I encourage other maintainers to just ignore these patches as well. thanks, greg k-h
On 13:48 Mon 29 Mar 2021, Greg KH wrote: >On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:25:11AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: >> On 07:29 Mon 29 Mar 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> > I really don't think these typo patchbomb are that useful. I'm all >> > for fixing typos when working with a subsystem, but I'm not sure these >> > patchbombs help anything. >> > >> I am sure you are holding the wrong end of the wand and grossly failing to >> understand. > >Please stop statements like this, it is not helpful and is doing nothing >but ensure that your patches will not be looked at in the future. > Greg, don't you think you are bit harsh and have an one sided view? People can say in better way if they don't like some work. I Have always try to get along. >> Anyway, I hope I give a heads up ...find "your way" to fix those damn >> thing...it's glaring.... > >There is no requirement that anyone accept patches that are sent to >them. When you complain when receiving comments on them, that >shows you do not wish to work with others. > Unfortunate you are only seeing my complains...I don't know why you are so blindfolded. >Sorry, but you are now on my local blacklist for a while, and I >encourage other maintainers to just ignore these patches as well. > I can not overrule that ...I know my pathes are trivial ..but it seems some other problems are looming large. NOT good Greg....not good seriously. >thanks, > >greg k-h