Message ID | 20210324081923.20379-1-noltari@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | pinctrl: add BCM63XX pincontrol support | expand |
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 9:19 AM Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com> wrote: > This patchset adds appropriate binding documentation and drivers for > pin controller cores found in the BCM63XX MIPS SoCs currently supported. I have applied and pushed the v9 patch series with all the ACKs to the "devel" branch so the build servers can churn at it! Later today I will integrate it into linux-next. Any remaining issues can certainly be fixed in-tree. Thanks for your perseverance in cleaning up these SoCs!! Now, what about a patch set for the IRQ support? :) Yours, Linus Walleij
Hi Linus, El 29/03/2021 a las 12:19, Linus Walleij escribió: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 9:19 AM Álvaro Fernández Rojas > <noltari@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This patchset adds appropriate binding documentation and drivers for >> pin controller cores found in the BCM63XX MIPS SoCs currently supported. > > I have applied and pushed the v9 patch series with all the ACKs > to the "devel" branch so the build servers can churn at it! Later > today I will integrate it into linux-next. > > Any remaining issues can certainly be fixed in-tree. > > Thanks for your perseverance in cleaning up these SoCs!! Many thanks for your support! :D > > Now, what about a patch set for the IRQ support? :) If you could give me some guidance on that matter it would be much appreciated, because your comments [1] are now outdated since I switched to GPIO_REGMAP [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-gpio/patch/20210225164216.21124-3-noltari@gmail.com/ > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > Best regards, Álvaro.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:57 AM Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com> wrote: > > Now, what about a patch set for the IRQ support? :) > > If you could give me some guidance on that matter it would be much > appreciated, because your comments [1] are now outdated since I switched > to GPIO_REGMAP > [1] > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-gpio/patch/20210225164216.21124-3-noltari@gmail.com/ I think it mostly holds: GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP should always be used if there is a reasonably straight-forward interrupts whether cascaded or hierarchical. Very few exceptions there. If there is one IRQ line per GPIO line, the hierarchical support should be used as outlined. GPIO_REGMAP should be mostly (famous last words) orthogonal. Yours, Linus Walleij