| Message ID | 20210407232001.16670-1-snelson@pensando.io (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | ionic: hwstamp tweaks | expand |
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master): On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:19:53 -0700 you wrote: > A few little changes after review comments and > additional internal testing. > > Shannon Nelson (8): > ionic: fix up a couple of code style nits > ionic: remove unnecessary compat ifdef > ionic: check for valid tx_mode on SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP xmit > ionic: add SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS > ionic: re-start ptp after queues up > ionic: ignore EBUSY on queue start > ionic: add ts_config replay > ionic: extend ts_config set locking > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next,1/8] ionic: fix up a couple of code style nits https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/33c252e1ba8b - [net-next,2/8] ionic: remove unnecessary compat ifdef https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e1edcc966ae8 - [net-next,3/8] ionic: check for valid tx_mode on SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP xmit https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e2ce148e948e - [net-next,4/8] ionic: add SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/bd7856bcd498 - [net-next,5/8] ionic: re-start ptp after queues up https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/51117874554d - [net-next,6/8] ionic: ignore EBUSY on queue start https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/99b5bea04f0f - [net-next,7/8] ionic: add ts_config replay https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/829600ce5e4e - [net-next,8/8] ionic: extend ts_config set locking https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f3318099658e You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:19:53PM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote: > A few little changes after review comments and > additional internal testing. This series is a delta against the previously posted one. Please follow the process by re-basing your changes into the original series, putting a "v2" into the Subject line, and adding a brief change log into the cover letter. Thanks, Richard
On 4/11/21 8:38 AM, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:19:53PM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote: >> A few little changes after review comments and >> additional internal testing. > This series is a delta against the previously posted one. Please > follow the process by re-basing your changes into the original series, > putting a "v2" into the Subject line, and adding a brief change log > into the cover letter. > > Thanks, > Richard If the original patches hadn't already been pulled into net-next, this is what I would have done. My understanding is that once the patches have been pulled into the repo that we need to do delta patches, not new versions of the same patch, as folks don't normally like changing published tree history. sln
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 09:33:29AM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote: > If the original patches hadn't already been pulled into net-next, this is > what I would have done. My understanding is that once the patches have been > pulled into the repo that we need to do delta patches, not new versions of > the same patch, as folks don't normally like changing published tree > history. Oh, the series you posted on April 1 was merged on April 2 without any review. That seems surprising to me, but perhaps the development tempo has increased. Wow, and this delta series was also: posted Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:19:53 -0700 merged Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 20:30:28 +0000 That is a pretty good turn around time, less that 24 hours! Oh well, too late to add my Acked-by. Thanks, Richard