Message ID | cover.1618832437.git.ps@pks.im (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | rev-list: implement object type filter | expand |
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes: > Hi, > > this is the fifth version of my patch series which implements a new > `object:type` filter for git-rev-list(1) and git-upload-pack(1) and > extends support for bitmap indices to work with combined filters. > > Changes compared to v4: > > - I'm now explicitly passing `strlen(v0)` to > `type_from_string_gently()` to be prepared for the future > semantics change here. > > - The error message printed in case the user passes in invalid > object type to `--filter=object:type=` now prints the wrong > value passed by the user. > > - Fixed missing header in list-objects-filter-options.h. > > - Tests now use test_create_repo and test_commit. > > - Removed a needless subshell in the tests. > > I hope that this catches all feedback and that I didn't misunderstand or > miss something. If I did, please give me a shout! Thanks. Will queue and wait. I am expecting to go offline for about a week starting 21st or so; hopefully the topyc is ready to merge it to 'next' by the time I come back online.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 04:16:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > this is the fifth version of my patch series which implements a new > > `object:type` filter for git-rev-list(1) and git-upload-pack(1) and > > extends support for bitmap indices to work with combined filters. > > > > Changes compared to v4: > > > > - I'm now explicitly passing `strlen(v0)` to > > `type_from_string_gently()` to be prepared for the future > > semantics change here. > > > > - The error message printed in case the user passes in invalid > > object type to `--filter=object:type=` now prints the wrong > > value passed by the user. > > > > - Fixed missing header in list-objects-filter-options.h. > > > > - Tests now use test_create_repo and test_commit. > > > > - Removed a needless subshell in the tests. > > > > I hope that this catches all feedback and that I didn't misunderstand or > > miss something. If I did, please give me a shout! > > Thanks. Will queue and wait. > > I am expecting to go offline for about a week starting 21st or so; > hopefully the topyc is ready to merge it to 'next' by the time I > come back online. This iteration looks good to me. -Peff
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: >> Thanks. Will queue and wait. >> >> I am expecting to go offline for about a week starting 21st or so; >> hopefully the topyc is ready to merge it to 'next' by the time I >> come back online. > > This iteration looks good to me. Thanks, both.