Message ID | 20210421174749.11221-2-hare@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | SCSI result cleanup, part 2 | expand |
On 4/21/21 10:47 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > The callers to st_scsi_execute already check for negative > return values, so we can drop the use of DRIVER_ERROR and > return the actual error code. A nit: I could only find a single caller? Thanks, Bart.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/st.c b/drivers/scsi/st.c index 9ca536aae784..23be6447e576 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/st.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/st.c @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static int st_scsi_execute(struct st_request *SRpnt, const unsigned char *cmd, data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE ? REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, 0); if (IS_ERR(req)) - return DRIVER_ERROR << 24; + return PTR_ERR(req); rq = scsi_req(req); req->rq_flags |= RQF_QUIET; @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static int st_scsi_execute(struct st_request *SRpnt, const unsigned char *cmd, GFP_KERNEL); if (err) { blk_put_request(req); - return DRIVER_ERROR << 24; + return err; } }
The callers to st_scsi_execute already check for negative return values, so we can drop the use of DRIVER_ERROR and return the actual error code. Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> --- drivers/scsi/st.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)