diff mbox series

[iproute2] mptcp: make sure flag signal is set when add addr with port

Message ID ea7d8eb1-5484-09dc-aa53-cf839b93bc73@163.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: David Ahern
Headers show
Series [iproute2] mptcp: make sure flag signal is set when add addr with port | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch

Commit Message

Jianguo Wu April 23, 2021, 10:24 a.m. UTC
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn>

When add address with port, it is mean to send an ADD_ADDR to remote,
so it must have flag signal set.

Fixes: 42fbca91cd61 ("mptcp: add support for port based endpoint")
Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn>
---
 ip/ipmptcp.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Comments

Matthieu Baerts April 30, 2021, 9:35 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi David,

Thank you for maintaining iproute2-next!

On 23/04/2021 12:24, Jianguo Wu wrote:
> From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn>
> 
> When add address with port, it is mean to send an ADD_ADDR to remote,
> so it must have flag signal set.
> 
> Fixes: 42fbca91cd61 ("mptcp: add support for port based endpoint")
> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn>

I see on patchwork[1] that this patch is marked as "Accepted". But I
cannot find it in 'main' branches from iproute2-next.git and
iproute2.git repos.

Did I miss it somewhere?

If it is not too late, here is a ACK from MPTCP team:

Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>

Thanks Jianguo for this patch!

Cheers,
Matt

[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/ea7d8eb1-5484-09dc-aa53-cf839b93bc73@163.com/
David Ahern April 30, 2021, 2:27 p.m. UTC | #2
On 4/30/21 3:35 AM, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> On 23/04/2021 12:24, Jianguo Wu wrote:
>> From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn>
>>
>> When add address with port, it is mean to send an ADD_ADDR to remote,
>> so it must have flag signal set.
>>
>> Fixes: 42fbca91cd61 ("mptcp: add support for port based endpoint")
>> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn>
> 
> I see on patchwork[1] that this patch is marked as "Accepted". But I
> cannot find it in 'main' branches from iproute2-next.git and
> iproute2.git repos.
> 
> Did I miss it somewhere?

no idea what happened

> 
> If it is not too late, here is a ACK from MPTCP team:
> 
> Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
> 

I'll add the Ack and apply.
Matthieu Baerts April 30, 2021, 2:50 p.m. UTC | #3
On 30/04/2021 16:27, David Ahern wrote:
> On 4/30/21 3:35 AM, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> On 23/04/2021 12:24, Jianguo Wu wrote:
>>> From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn>
>>>
>>> When add address with port, it is mean to send an ADD_ADDR to remote,
>>> so it must have flag signal set.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 42fbca91cd61 ("mptcp: add support for port based endpoint")
>>> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn>
>>
>> I see on patchwork[1] that this patch is marked as "Accepted". But I
>> cannot find it in 'main' branches from iproute2-next.git and
>> iproute2.git repos.
>>
>> Did I miss it somewhere?
> 
> no idea what happened
> 
>>
>> If it is not too late, here is a ACK from MPTCP team:
>>
>> Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
>>
> 
> I'll add the Ack and apply.

Thank you for your help!

Cheers,
Matt
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/ip/ipmptcp.c b/ip/ipmptcp.c
index 5f490f0..44af723 100644
--- a/ip/ipmptcp.c
+++ b/ip/ipmptcp.c
@@ -143,6 +143,9 @@  static int mptcp_parse_opt(int argc, char **argv, struct nlmsghdr *n,
 	if (!id_set && !adding)
 		missarg("ID");

+	if (port && !(flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SIGNAL))
+		invarg("flags must have signal when using port", "port");
+
 	attr_addr = addattr_nest(n, MPTCP_BUFLEN,
 				 MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR | NLA_F_NESTED);
 	if (id_set)