diff mbox series

[v2] nfc: st-nci: remove unnecessary labels

Message ID 20210526011624.11204-1-samirweng1979@163.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit c7a551b2e44a65170b5dceaca0afbd59f3715f11
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [v2] nfc: st-nci: remove unnecessary labels | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/subject_prefix warning Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 2 of 2 maintainers
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 75 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link

Commit Message

samirweng1979 May 26, 2021, 1:16 a.m. UTC
From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>

Some labels are only used once, so we delete them and use the
return statement instead of the goto statement.

Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>
---
 drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c | 15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski May 26, 2021, 1:56 p.m. UTC | #1
On 25/05/2021 21:16, samirweng1979 wrote:
> From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>
> 
> Some labels are only used once, so we delete them and use the
> return statement instead of the goto statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c | 15 +++++----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 


Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org May 26, 2021, 8:20 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Wed, 26 May 2021 09:16:24 +0800 you wrote:
> From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>
> 
> Some labels are only used once, so we delete them and use the
> return statement instead of the goto statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2] nfc: st-nci: remove unnecessary labels
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c7a551b2e44a

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c b/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c
index c6a9d30..94b6000 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@  static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_info(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 	r = nci_hci_send_cmd(ndev, ST_NCI_DEVICE_MGNT_GATE, ST_NCI_HCI_DM_GETINFO,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					     HCI_DM_GET_INFO, skb->len);
@@ -117,7 +117,6 @@  static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_info(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -131,7 +130,7 @@  static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_data(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 	r = nci_hci_send_cmd(ndev, ST_NCI_DEVICE_MGNT_GATE, ST_NCI_HCI_DM_GETDATA,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					     HCI_DM_GET_DATA, skb->len);
@@ -150,7 +149,6 @@  static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_data(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -216,7 +214,7 @@  static int st_nci_hci_get_param(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 	r = nci_hci_get_param(ndev, param->gate, param->data, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					     HCI_GET_PARAM, skb->len);
@@ -235,7 +233,6 @@  static int st_nci_hci_get_param(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -262,7 +259,7 @@  static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_measurement_value(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 			     ST_NCI_HCI_DM_VDC_MEASUREMENT_VALUE,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 				HCI_DM_VDC_MEASUREMENT_VALUE, skb->len);
@@ -281,7 +278,6 @@  static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_measurement_value(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -299,7 +295,7 @@  static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_value_comparison(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 			     ST_NCI_HCI_DM_VDC_VALUE_COMPARISON,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					HCI_DM_VDC_VALUE_COMPARISON, skb->len);
@@ -318,7 +314,6 @@  static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_value_comparison(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }