diff mbox series

[01/12] nfc: fdp: correct kerneldoc for structure

Message ID 20210528124200.79655-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit cd4375d621aa0adda527640b421fad969bf0c9bd
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [01/12] nfc: fdp: correct kerneldoc for structure | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter warning Series does not have a cover letter
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/subject_prefix warning Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: unixbhaskar@gmail.com wengjianfeng@yulong.com zuoqilin@yulong.com
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 16 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link

Commit Message

Krzysztof Kozlowski May 28, 2021, 12:41 p.m. UTC
Since structure comments are not kerneldoc, remove the double ** to fix
W=1 warnings:

    warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org May 28, 2021, 10:20 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Fri, 28 May 2021 08:41:49 -0400 you wrote:
> Since structure comments are not kerneldoc, remove the double ** to fix
> W=1 warnings:
> 
>     warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [01/12] nfc: fdp: correct kerneldoc for structure
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/cd4375d621aa
  - [02/12] nfc: fdp: drop ACPI_PTR from device ID table
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/466e1c889c71
  - [03/12] nfc: port100: correct kerneldoc for structure
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/a548bee9ffe8
  - [04/12] nfc: pn533: drop of_match_ptr from device ID table
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/a70bbbe387d0
  - [05/12] nfc: mrvl: mark OF device ID tables as maybe unused
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/26f20ff5e207
  - [06/12] nfc: mrvl: skip impossible NCI_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE check
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/41a6bf50ee04
  - [07/12] nfc: pn533: mark OF device ID tables as maybe unused
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b3a790d43749
  - [08/12] nfc: s3fwrn5: mark OF device ID tables as maybe unused
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5edc94265e19
  - [09/12] nfc: pn544: mark ACPI and OF device ID tables as maybe unused
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/aa1405772fe1
  - [10/12] nfc: st-nci: mark ACPI and OF device ID tables as maybe unused
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/255fcc7b7166
  - [11/12] nfc: st21nfca: mark ACPI and OF device ID tables as maybe unused
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/806278023492
  - [12/12] nfc: st95hf: mark ACPI and OF device ID tables as maybe unused
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/1ab4fe09977e

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c b/drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c
index fe0719ed81a0..125d71c27b8b 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@  static void fdp_nci_send_patch_cb(struct nci_dev *ndev)
 	wake_up(&info->setup_wq);
 }
 
-/**
+/*
  * Register a packet sent counter and a callback
  *
  * We have no other way of knowing when all firmware packets were sent out
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@  static void fdp_nci_set_data_pkt_counter(struct nci_dev *ndev,
 	info->data_pkt_counter_cb = cb;
 }
 
-/**
+/*
  * The device is expecting a stream of packets. All packets need to
  * have the PBF flag set to 0x0 (last packet) even if the firmware
  * file is segmented and there are multiple packets. If we give the