mbox series

[0/7] clk: clean up legacy clock interfaces

Message ID 20210531173429.2467403-1-arnd@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series clk: clean up legacy clock interfaces | expand

Message

Arnd Bergmann May 31, 2021, 5:34 p.m. UTC
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

A recent discussion about legacy clk interface users revealed
that there are only two platforms remaining that provide their own
clk_get()/clk_put() implementations, MIPS ar7 and and m68k coldfire.

I managed to rework both of these to just use the normal clkdev code,
and fold CONFIG_CLKDEV_LOOKUP into CONFIG_HAVE_CLK as it is now shared
among all users.

As I noticed that the ar7 clock implementation and the ralink version
are rather trivial, I ended up converting those to use the common-clk
interfaces as well, though this is unrelated to the other changes.

     Arnd

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a2XsrfUJQQAfnGknh8HiA-D9L_wmEoAgXU89KqagE31NQ@mail.gmail.com/

Arnd Bergmann (7):
  mips: ar7: convert to clkdev_lookup
  mips: ar7: convert to CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
  mips: ralink: convert to CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
  m68k: coldfire: use clkdev_lookup on most coldfire
  m68k: coldfire: remove private clk_get/clk_put
  clkdev: remove CONFIG_CLKDEV_LOOKUP
  clkdev: remove unused clkdev_alloc() interfaces

 arch/arm/Kconfig                     |   2 -
 arch/m68k/coldfire/clk.c             |  21 -----
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m5206.c           |  25 +++---
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m520x.c           |  51 +++++------
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m523x.c           |  42 ++++-----
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m5249.c           |  33 +++----
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m525x.c           |  33 +++----
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m5272.c           |  35 +++-----
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m527x.c           |  46 ++++------
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m528x.c           |  42 ++++-----
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m5307.c           |  27 +++---
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m53xx.c           |  80 ++++++++---------
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m5407.c           |  25 +++---
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m5441x.c          | 126 +++++++++++++--------------
 arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c           |  33 +++----
 arch/m68k/include/asm/mcfclk.h       |   5 --
 arch/mips/Kconfig                    |   6 +-
 arch/mips/ar7/clock.c                | 113 ++++++------------------
 arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ar7/ar7.h |   4 -
 arch/mips/pic32/Kconfig              |   1 -
 arch/mips/ralink/Kconfig             |   5 --
 arch/mips/ralink/clk.c               |  64 +-------------
 arch/sh/Kconfig                      |   1 -
 drivers/clk/Kconfig                  |   6 +-
 drivers/clk/Makefile                 |   3 +-
 drivers/clk/clkdev.c                 |  28 ------
 drivers/clocksource/Kconfig          |   6 +-
 drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig             |   4 +-
 drivers/staging/board/Kconfig        |   2 +-
 include/linux/clkdev.h               |   5 --
 sound/soc/dwc/Kconfig                |   2 +-
 sound/soc/rockchip/Kconfig           |  14 +--
 32 files changed, 320 insertions(+), 570 deletions(-)

Comments

Dmitry Osipenko May 31, 2021, 6:44 p.m. UTC | #1
31.05.2021 20:34, Arnd Bergmann пишет:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> A recent discussion about legacy clk interface users revealed
> that there are only two platforms remaining that provide their own
> clk_get()/clk_put() implementations, MIPS ar7 and and m68k coldfire.
> 
> I managed to rework both of these to just use the normal clkdev code,
> and fold CONFIG_CLKDEV_LOOKUP into CONFIG_HAVE_CLK as it is now shared
> among all users.
> 
> As I noticed that the ar7 clock implementation and the ralink version
> are rather trivial, I ended up converting those to use the common-clk
> interfaces as well, though this is unrelated to the other changes.
> 
>      Arnd
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a2XsrfUJQQAfnGknh8HiA-D9L_wmEoAgXU89KqagE31NQ@mail.gmail.com/

Awesome, thank you very much!

I see only this cover-letter email, will we see the rest of the patches?
The patches 1-7 have only linux-clk@vger.kernel.org in the recipients.
Arnd Bergmann May 31, 2021, 6:47 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 8:44 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Awesome, thank you very much!
>
> I see only this cover-letter email, will we see the rest of the patches?
> The patches 1-7 have only linux-clk@vger.kernel.org in the recipients.

Oops, I meant to send with --cc-cover, sorry about that, and sorry for the
coming duplicate mails on linux-clk@v.g.o.

       Arnd