Message ID | pull.980.v2.git.1623763746.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | cat-file: reuse ref-filter logic | expand |
"ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > This patch series make cat-file reuse ref-filter logic, which based on > 5a5b5f78 ([GSOC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom) Hmph, does anybody have 5a5b5f78? The way to deal with this and avoid resending the same patches (assuming that this is not a 9-patch series, but only 5 of them are new) is to rebase your topic on 723bc66d (ref-filter: add %(rest) atom, 2021-06-09), which will allow you to discard the 4 earlier patches, and force push, with base set to 723bc66d, I think, but I am not a GGG user, so there may need an extra step or two on top of that.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 于2021年6月16日周三 下午3:29写道: > > "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > > > This patch series make cat-file reuse ref-filter logic, which based on > > 5a5b5f78 ([GSOC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom) > > Hmph, does anybody have 5a5b5f78? > > The way to deal with this and avoid resending the same patches > (assuming that this is not a 9-patch series, but only 5 of them are > new) is to rebase your topic on 723bc66d (ref-filter: add %(rest) > atom, 2021-06-09), which will allow you to discard the 4 earlier > patches, and force push, with base set to 723bc66d, I think, but I > am not a GGG user, so there may need an extra step or two on top of > that. Oh, 5a5b5f78 is in gitgitgadget.git and 723bc66d in git.git, their commit messages are different. Later I will rebase my new patch to zh/xxx. Thanks. -- ZheNing Hu
On Tue, Jun 15 2021, ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget wrote: > This patch series make cat-file reuse ref-filter logic, which based on > 5a5b5f78 ([GSOC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom) > > Change from last version: > > 1. Use free_array_item_internal() to solve the memory leak problem. > 2. Change commit message of ([GSOC] ref-filter: teach get_object() return > useful value). I left some comments, but saw after the fact that I'd replied to the v1 E-Mails by accident, but anyway, the comments were all on things that are also in v2, so it worked out in the end. Sorry about the confusion.
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> 于2021年6月17日周四 下午3:27写道: > > > On Tue, Jun 15 2021, ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget wrote: > > > This patch series make cat-file reuse ref-filter logic, which based on > > 5a5b5f78 ([GSOC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom) > > > > Change from last version: > > > > 1. Use free_array_item_internal() to solve the memory leak problem. > > 2. Change commit message of ([GSOC] ref-filter: teach get_object() return > > useful value). > > I left some comments, but saw after the fact that I'd replied to the v1 > E-Mails by accident, but anyway, the comments were all on things that > are also in v2, so it worked out in the end. Sorry about the confusion. It's okay. Your comments are very useful. Thanks. -- ZheNing Hu