Message ID | 20210618074456.17544-1-samirweng1979@163.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | NFC: nxp-nci: remove unnecessary label | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be net-next |
netdev/subject_prefix | warning | Target tree name not specified in the subject |
netdev/cc_maintainers | success | CCed 4 of 4 maintainers |
netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 19 lines checked |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
On 18/06/2021 09:44, samirweng1979 wrote: > From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com> > > Label chunk_exit is unnecessary, so we delete it and > directly return -ENOMEM. There is no plural here, no collective "we". Please, use simple statements: "Remove unnecessary label chunk_exit and return directly." You could add here the explanation for question "why doing this?", e.g. "Simplify the code by removing unnecessary label chunk_exit and returning directly." > > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com> > --- > drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/firmware.c | 7 ++----- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/firmware.c b/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/firmware.c > index dae0c80..119bf30 100644 > --- a/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/firmware.c > +++ b/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/firmware.c > @@ -95,10 +95,8 @@ static int nxp_nci_fw_send_chunk(struct nxp_nci_info *info) > int r; > > skb = nci_skb_alloc(info->ndev, info->max_payload, GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!skb) { > - r = -ENOMEM; > - goto chunk_exit; > - } > + if (!skb) > + return -ENOMEM; > > chunk_len = info->max_payload - NXP_NCI_FW_HDR_LEN - NXP_NCI_FW_CRC_LEN; > remaining_len = fw_info->frame_size - fw_info->written; > @@ -124,7 +122,6 @@ static int nxp_nci_fw_send_chunk(struct nxp_nci_info *info) > > kfree_skb(skb); > > -chunk_exit: > return r; > } > > Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/firmware.c b/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/firmware.c index dae0c80..119bf30 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/firmware.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/firmware.c @@ -95,10 +95,8 @@ static int nxp_nci_fw_send_chunk(struct nxp_nci_info *info) int r; skb = nci_skb_alloc(info->ndev, info->max_payload, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!skb) { - r = -ENOMEM; - goto chunk_exit; - } + if (!skb) + return -ENOMEM; chunk_len = info->max_payload - NXP_NCI_FW_HDR_LEN - NXP_NCI_FW_CRC_LEN; remaining_len = fw_info->frame_size - fw_info->written; @@ -124,7 +122,6 @@ static int nxp_nci_fw_send_chunk(struct nxp_nci_info *info) kfree_skb(skb); -chunk_exit: return r; }