mbox series

[v3,0/5] mingw: handle absolute paths in expand_user_path()

Message ID pull.66.v3.git.1627164413.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series mingw: handle absolute paths in expand_user_path() | expand

Message

Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget July 24, 2021, 10:06 p.m. UTC
In Git for Windows, we ran with a patch "in production" for quite a while
where paths starting with a slash (i.e. looking like Unix paths, not like
Windows paths) were interpreted as being relative to the runtime prefix,
when expanded via expand_user_path().

This was sent to the Git mailing list as a discussion starter, and it was
pointed out that this is neither portable nor unambiguous.

After the dust settled, I thought about the presented ideas for a while
(quite a while...), ended up with a solution, then adapted it to Junio's
preference: any path starting with %(prefix)/ is expanded. This is ambiguous
because it could be a valid path. But then, it is unlikely, and if someone
really wants to specify such a path, it is easy to slap a ./ in front and
they're done.

Changes since v2:

 * Adjusted to Junio's preference %(...) over <...>. Of course, the
   preferred preference has the disadvantage of actually being allowed in
   Win32 filenames, but then, the workaround is as easy as on non-Windows
   platforms.
 * Since our convention of %(...) interpolation does not involve uppercase
   keywords, I now use a lowercase one.
 * Since this keyword is interpolated to the compiled-in prefix if built
   without runtime prefix support, I dropped the runtime part of the
   keyword.
 * Renamed the expand_user_path() to interpolate_path(), to remove the
   distraction as to the implementation detail which things get to be
   interpolated (because we extend it to interpolate more than just a home
   directory, which might well be unclear from the former name, anyway).
 * Adjusted the code comment above the interpolate_path() to remove a stale
   part, clarify another part, and to extend it to talk about the prefix
   expansion, too.

Changes since v1:

 * Included a test for the RUNTIME_PREFIX that I had meant to send for ages
   already, and based on which...
 * A test case was added to verify that this actually works as intended
 * It is no longer Windows-specific
 * I added some documentation

Johannes Schindelin (5):
  tests: exercise the RUNTIME_PREFIX feature
  expand_user_path(): remove stale part of the comment
  expand_user_path(): clarify the role of the `real_home` parameter
  Use a better name for the function interpolating paths
  interpolate_path(): allow specifying paths relative to the runtime
    prefix

 Documentation/config.txt   |  9 +++++++++
 Makefile                   |  5 +++++
 builtin/credential-cache.c |  2 +-
 builtin/credential-store.c |  2 +-
 builtin/gc.c               |  2 +-
 cache.h                    |  2 +-
 config.c                   |  8 ++++----
 path.c                     | 19 +++++++++++++------
 sequencer.c                |  2 +-
 t/t0060-path-utils.sh      | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 10 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)


base-commit: ebf3c04b262aa27fbb97f8a0156c2347fecafafb
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-66%2Fdscho%2Fmingw-expand-absolute-user-path-v3
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-66/dscho/mingw-expand-absolute-user-path-v3
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/66

Range-diff vs v2:

 1:  cc8f09baba9 = 1:  cc8f09baba9 tests: exercise the RUNTIME_PREFIX feature
 -:  ----------- > 2:  a4ff3a461bc expand_user_path(): remove stale part of the comment
 -:  ----------- > 3:  7b79ba66dd0 expand_user_path(): clarify the role of the `real_home` parameter
 -:  ----------- > 4:  19fd9c3c803 Use a better name for the function interpolating paths
 2:  66df56f5db0 ! 5:  d286583082e expand_user_path(): support specifying paths relative to the runtime prefix
     @@ Metadata
      Author: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
      
       ## Commit message ##
     -    expand_user_path(): support specifying paths relative to the runtime prefix
     +    interpolate_path(): allow specifying paths relative to the runtime prefix
      
          Ever since Git learned to detect its install location at runtime, there
          was the slightly awkward problem that it was impossible to specify paths
     @@ Commit message
          they are interpreted as absolute paths in the same drive as the current
          directory.
      
     -    After a lengthy discussion, and a way lengthier time to mull over the
     -    problem and its best solution, we decided to introduce support for the
     -    magic sequence `<RUNTIME-PREFIX>/`. If a path starts with this, the
     -    remainder is interpreted as relative to the detected runtime prefix.
     +    After a lengthy discussion, and an even lengthier time to mull over the
     +    problem and its best solution, and then more discussions, we eventually
     +    decided to introduce support for the magic sequence `%(prefix)/`. If a
     +    path starts with this, the remainder is interpreted as relative to the
     +    detected (runtime) prefix. If built without runtime prefix support, Git
     +    will simply interpolate the compiled-in prefix.
      
     -    This solves the problem, but what new problems does it stir up? Here are
     -    the two most obvious ones:
     -
     -    - What if Git was not compiled with support for a runtime prefix?
     -
     -      In that case, we will simply use the compiled-in hard-coded prefix.
     -
     -    - What if a user _wants_ to specify a path starting with the magic
     -      sequence?
     -
     -      In that case, the user will simply need to prefix the magic sequence
     -      with `./` and voilĂ , the path won't be expanded.
     +    If a user _wants_ to specify a path starting with the magic sequence,
     +    they can prefix the magic sequence with `./` and voilĂ , the path won't
     +    be expanded.
      
          Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
      
     @@ Documentation/config.txt: pathname::
       	is expanded to the value of `$HOME`, and `~user/` to the
       	specified user's home directory.
      ++
     -+If a path starts with `<RUNTIME-PREFIX>/`, the remainder is
     -+interpreted as a path relative to Git's "runtime prefix", i.e. relative
     -+to the location where Git itself was installed. For example,
     -+`<RUNTIME-PREFIX>/bin/` refers to the directory in which the Git
     -+executable itself lives. If Git was compiled without runtime prefix
     -+support, the compiled-in prefix will be subsituted instead. In the
     -+unlikely event that a literal path needs to be specified that should
     -+_not_ be expanded, it needs to be prefixed by `./`, like so:
     -+`./<RUNTIME-PREFIX>/bin`.
     ++If a path starts with `%(prefix)/`, the remainder is interpreted as a
     ++path relative to Git's "runtime prefix", i.e. relative to the location
     ++where Git itself was installed. For example, `%(prefix)/bin/` refers to
     ++the directory in which the Git executable itself lives. If Git was
     ++compiled without runtime prefix support, the compiled-in prefix will be
     ++subsituted instead. In the unlikely event that a literal path needs to
     ++be specified that should _not_ be expanded, it needs to be prefixed by
     ++`./`, like so: `./%(prefix)/bin`.
       
       
       Variables
     @@ path.c
       
       static int get_st_mode_bits(const char *path, int *mode)
       {
     -@@ path.c: char *expand_user_path(const char *path, int real_home)
     +@@ path.c: static struct passwd *getpw_str(const char *username, size_t len)
     +  * failure or if path is NULL.
     +  *
     +  * If real_home is true, strbuf_realpath($HOME) is used in the `~/` expansion.
     ++ *
     ++ * If the path starts with `%(prefix)/`, the remainder is interpreted as
     ++ * relative to where Git is installed, and expanded to the absolute path.
     +  */
     + char *interpolate_path(const char *path, int real_home)
     + {
     +@@ path.c: char *interpolate_path(const char *path, int real_home)
       
       	if (path == NULL)
       		goto return_null;
      +
     -+	if (skip_prefix(path, "<RUNTIME-PREFIX>/", &path))
     ++	if (skip_prefix(path, "%(prefix)/", &path))
      +		return system_path(path);
      +
       	if (path[0] == '~') {
     @@ t/t0060-path-utils.sh: test_expect_success RUNTIME_PREFIX,CAN_EXEC_IN_PWD 'RUNTI
       	echo HERE >expect &&
      +	test_cmp expect actual'
      +
     -+test_expect_success RUNTIME_PREFIX,CAN_EXEC_IN_PWD '<RUNTIME-PREFIX>/ works' '
     ++test_expect_success RUNTIME_PREFIX,CAN_EXEC_IN_PWD '%(prefix)/ works' '
      +	mkdir -p pretend/bin &&
      +	cp "$GIT_EXEC_PATH"/git$X pretend/bin/ &&
     -+	git config yes.path "<RUNTIME-PREFIX>/yes" &&
     ++	git config yes.path "%(prefix)/yes" &&
      +	GIT_EXEC_PATH= ./pretend/bin/git config --path yes.path >actual &&
      +	echo "$(pwd)/pretend/yes" >expect &&
       	test_cmp expect actual

Comments

Junio C Hamano July 26, 2021, 5:56 p.m. UTC | #1
"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:

>  * Since our convention of %(...) interpolation does not involve uppercase
>    keywords, I now use a lowercase one.

Makes sense.

>  * Since this keyword is interpolated to the compiled-in prefix if built
>    without runtime prefix support, I dropped the runtime part of the
>    keyword.

I have this nagging feeling that %(prefix) may be (mistakenly)
expected to interporate to $(git rev-parse --show-prefix).  Of
course, nobody would expect that in paths in the configuration
files, but because we are borrowing %(token) convention from
elsewhere, it is not outragous to imagine that either "for-each-ref"
family or "log" family of placeholders may want to use %(prefix)"
for such purpose (for that matter, they may also be helped to have
the runtime-prefix information available).

Perhaps %(installPrefix) or something may have less chance of making
us regret later.  I am just raising this as a possible problem; I
personally would not be confused if we settled on the %(prefix).

>  * Renamed the expand_user_path() to interpolate_path(), to remove the
>    distraction as to the implementation detail which things get to be
>    interpolated (because we extend it to interpolate more than just a home
>    directory, which might well be unclear from the former name, anyway).

Great.

>  * Adjusted the code comment above the interpolate_path() to remove a stale
>    part, clarify another part, and to extend it to talk about the prefix
>    expansion, too.

These looked good, too.

Thanks.