Message ID | 20210718122024.204907-3-paul@crapouillou.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/3] dt-bindings: dma: ingenic: Add compatible strings for MDMA | expand |
On 18-07-21, 13:20, Paul Cercueil wrote: > The JZ4760 and JZ4760B SoCs have two regular DMA controllers with 6 > channels each. They also have an extra DMA controller named MDMA > with only 2 channels, that only supports memcpy operations. It is dmaengine not dma: > > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> > --- > drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c b/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c > index d71bc7235959..eed505e3cce2 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c > @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ > #define JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM BIT(2) > #define JZ_SOC_DATA_NO_DCKES_DCKEC BIT(3) > #define JZ_SOC_DATA_BREAK_LINKS BIT(4) > +#define JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY BIT(5) Why -ve logic? Looks like MEMCPY is eveywhere and only peripheral is not there at few SoC, so use JZ_SOC_DATA_PERIPHERAL > > /** > * struct jz4780_dma_hwdesc - descriptor structure read by the DMA controller. > @@ -896,8 +897,10 @@ static int jz4780_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > dd = &jzdma->dma_device; > > dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, dd->cap_mask); > - dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, dd->cap_mask); > - dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, dd->cap_mask); > + if (!(soc_data->flags & JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY)) { > + dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, dd->cap_mask); > + dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, dd->cap_mask); > + } and set this if JZ_SOC_DATA_PERIPHERAL is set? > > dd->dev = dev; > dd->copy_align = DMAENGINE_ALIGN_4_BYTES; > @@ -1018,12 +1021,25 @@ static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4760_dma_soc_data = { > .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM | JZ_SOC_DATA_NO_DCKES_DCKEC, > }; > > +static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4760_mdma_soc_data = { > + .nb_channels = 2, > + .transfer_ord_max = 6, > + .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM | JZ_SOC_DATA_NO_DCKES_DCKEC | > + JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY, > +}; > + > static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4760b_dma_soc_data = { > .nb_channels = 5, > .transfer_ord_max = 6, > .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM, > }; > > +static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4760b_mdma_soc_data = { > + .nb_channels = 2, > + .transfer_ord_max = 6, > + .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM | JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY, > +}; > + > static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4770_dma_soc_data = { > .nb_channels = 6, > .transfer_ord_max = 6, > @@ -1052,7 +1068,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id jz4780_dma_dt_match[] = { > { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4740-dma", .data = &jz4740_dma_soc_data }, > { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4725b-dma", .data = &jz4725b_dma_soc_data }, > { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760-dma", .data = &jz4760_dma_soc_data }, > + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760-mdma", .data = &jz4760_mdma_soc_data }, > { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760b-dma", .data = &jz4760b_dma_soc_data }, > + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760b-mdma", .data = &jz4760b_mdma_soc_data }, > { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4770-dma", .data = &jz4770_dma_soc_data }, > { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-dma", .data = &jz4780_dma_soc_data }, > { .compatible = "ingenic,x1000-dma", .data = &x1000_dma_soc_data }, > -- > 2.30.2
Hi Vinod, Le mer., juil. 28 2021 at 12:46:20 +0530, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> a écrit : > On 18-07-21, 13:20, Paul Cercueil wrote: >> The JZ4760 and JZ4760B SoCs have two regular DMA controllers with 6 >> channels each. They also have an extra DMA controller named MDMA >> with only 2 channels, that only supports memcpy operations. > > It is dmaengine not dma: > >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> >> --- >> drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c b/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c >> index d71bc7235959..eed505e3cce2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c >> +++ b/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c >> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ >> #define JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM BIT(2) >> #define JZ_SOC_DATA_NO_DCKES_DCKEC BIT(3) >> #define JZ_SOC_DATA_BREAK_LINKS BIT(4) >> +#define JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY BIT(5) > > Why -ve logic? Looks like MEMCPY is eveywhere and only peripheral is > not > there at few SoC, so use JZ_SOC_DATA_PERIPHERAL That means touching every other jz4780_dma_soc_data structure in a patch that's focused on one SoC. That means a messy patch, and I don't like that. Negative logic is a problem if it makes it harder to understand, I don't think it's the case here. Besides, we already have JZ_SOC_DATA_NO_DCKES_DCKEC. Cheers, -Paul >> >> /** >> * struct jz4780_dma_hwdesc - descriptor structure read by the DMA >> controller. >> @@ -896,8 +897,10 @@ static int jz4780_dma_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> dd = &jzdma->dma_device; >> >> dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, dd->cap_mask); >> - dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, dd->cap_mask); >> - dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, dd->cap_mask); >> + if (!(soc_data->flags & JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY)) { >> + dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, dd->cap_mask); >> + dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, dd->cap_mask); >> + } > > and set this if JZ_SOC_DATA_PERIPHERAL is set? > >> >> dd->dev = dev; >> dd->copy_align = DMAENGINE_ALIGN_4_BYTES; >> @@ -1018,12 +1021,25 @@ static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data >> jz4760_dma_soc_data = { >> .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM | JZ_SOC_DATA_NO_DCKES_DCKEC, >> }; >> >> +static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4760_mdma_soc_data = { >> + .nb_channels = 2, >> + .transfer_ord_max = 6, >> + .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM | JZ_SOC_DATA_NO_DCKES_DCKEC | >> + JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY, >> +}; >> + >> static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4760b_dma_soc_data = { >> .nb_channels = 5, >> .transfer_ord_max = 6, >> .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM, >> }; >> >> +static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4760b_mdma_soc_data = { >> + .nb_channels = 2, >> + .transfer_ord_max = 6, >> + .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM | JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY, >> +}; >> + >> static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4770_dma_soc_data = { >> .nb_channels = 6, >> .transfer_ord_max = 6, >> @@ -1052,7 +1068,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id >> jz4780_dma_dt_match[] = { >> { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4740-dma", .data = >> &jz4740_dma_soc_data }, >> { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4725b-dma", .data = >> &jz4725b_dma_soc_data }, >> { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760-dma", .data = >> &jz4760_dma_soc_data }, >> + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760-mdma", .data = >> &jz4760_mdma_soc_data }, >> { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760b-dma", .data = >> &jz4760b_dma_soc_data }, >> + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760b-mdma", .data = >> &jz4760b_mdma_soc_data }, >> { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4770-dma", .data = >> &jz4770_dma_soc_data }, >> { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-dma", .data = >> &jz4780_dma_soc_data }, >> { .compatible = "ingenic,x1000-dma", .data = &x1000_dma_soc_data >> }, >> -- >> 2.30.2 > > -- > ~Vinod
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c b/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c index d71bc7235959..eed505e3cce2 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ #define JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM BIT(2) #define JZ_SOC_DATA_NO_DCKES_DCKEC BIT(3) #define JZ_SOC_DATA_BREAK_LINKS BIT(4) +#define JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY BIT(5) /** * struct jz4780_dma_hwdesc - descriptor structure read by the DMA controller. @@ -896,8 +897,10 @@ static int jz4780_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) dd = &jzdma->dma_device; dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, dd->cap_mask); - dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, dd->cap_mask); - dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, dd->cap_mask); + if (!(soc_data->flags & JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY)) { + dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, dd->cap_mask); + dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, dd->cap_mask); + } dd->dev = dev; dd->copy_align = DMAENGINE_ALIGN_4_BYTES; @@ -1018,12 +1021,25 @@ static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4760_dma_soc_data = { .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM | JZ_SOC_DATA_NO_DCKES_DCKEC, }; +static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4760_mdma_soc_data = { + .nb_channels = 2, + .transfer_ord_max = 6, + .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM | JZ_SOC_DATA_NO_DCKES_DCKEC | + JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY, +}; + static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4760b_dma_soc_data = { .nb_channels = 5, .transfer_ord_max = 6, .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM, }; +static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4760b_mdma_soc_data = { + .nb_channels = 2, + .transfer_ord_max = 6, + .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_PER_CHAN_PM | JZ_SOC_DATA_ONLY_MEMCPY, +}; + static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data jz4770_dma_soc_data = { .nb_channels = 6, .transfer_ord_max = 6, @@ -1052,7 +1068,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id jz4780_dma_dt_match[] = { { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4740-dma", .data = &jz4740_dma_soc_data }, { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4725b-dma", .data = &jz4725b_dma_soc_data }, { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760-dma", .data = &jz4760_dma_soc_data }, + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760-mdma", .data = &jz4760_mdma_soc_data }, { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760b-dma", .data = &jz4760b_dma_soc_data }, + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760b-mdma", .data = &jz4760b_mdma_soc_data }, { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4770-dma", .data = &jz4770_dma_soc_data }, { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-dma", .data = &jz4780_dma_soc_data }, { .compatible = "ingenic,x1000-dma", .data = &x1000_dma_soc_data },
The JZ4760 and JZ4760B SoCs have two regular DMA controllers with 6 channels each. They also have an extra DMA controller named MDMA with only 2 channels, that only supports memcpy operations. Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> --- drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)