Message ID | 20210729162028.29512-1-quentin@isovalent.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | libbpf: rename btf__get_from_id() and btf__load() APIs, support split BTF | expand |
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 9:20 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> wrote: > > As part of the effort to move towards a v1.0 for libbpf [0], this set > improves some confusing function names related to BTF loading from and to > the kernel: > > - btf__load() becomes btf__load_into_kernel(). > - btf__get_from_id becomes btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(). > - A new version btf__load_from_kernel_by_id_split() extends the former to > add support for split BTF. > > The old functions are marked for deprecation for the next minor version > (0.6) of libbpf. > > The last patch is a trivial change to bpftool to add support for dumping > split BTF objects by referencing them by their id (and not only by their > BTF path). > > [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/wiki/Libbpf:-the-road-to-v1.0#btfh-apis > > v3: > - Use libbpf_err_ptr() in btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(), ERR_PTR() in > bpftool's get_map_kv_btf(). > - Move the definition of btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() closer to the > btf__parse() group in btf.h (move the legacy function with it). > - Fix a bug on the return value in libbpf_find_prog_btf_id(), as a new > patch. > - Move the btf__free() fixes to their own patch. > - Add "Fixes:" tags to relevant patches. > - Re-introduce deprecation (removed in v2) for the legacy functions, as a > new macro LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(major, minor, message). > > v2: > - Remove deprecation marking of legacy functions (patch 4/6 from v1). > - Make btf__load_from_kernel_by_id{,_split}() return the btf struct, adjust > surrounding code and call btf__free() when missing. > - Add new functions to v0.5.0 API (and not v0.6.0). > > Quentin Monnet (8): > libbpf: return non-null error on failures in libbpf_find_prog_btf_id() > libbpf: rename btf__load() as btf__load_into_kernel() > libbpf: rename btf__get_from_id() as btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() > tools: free BTF objects at various locations > tools: replace btf__get_from_id() with btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() > libbpf: prepare deprecation of btf__get_from_id(), btf__load() > libbpf: add split BTF support for btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() > tools: bpftool: support dumping split BTF by id > > tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c | 8 ++--- > tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c | 6 ++-- > tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 14 ++++----- > tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 29 +++++++++++------ > tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 3 ++ > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 33 ++++++++++++++------ > tools/lib/bpf/btf.h | 7 ++++- > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 11 ++++--- > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 3 ++ > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h | 19 +++++++++++ > tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c | 11 ++++--- > tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c | 12 +++++-- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 4 ++- > 13 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.30.2 > I dropped patch #7 with deprecations and LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE and applied to bpf-next. Current LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE approach doesn't work (and you should have caught this when you built selftests/bpf, what happened there?). bpftool build generates warnings like this: In file included from /data/users/andriin/linux/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h:20, from xlated_dumper.c:10: /data/users/andriin/linux/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h:22:23: warning: "LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef] __LIBBPF_GET_VERSION(LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION, LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ And it makes total sense. LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE() assumes LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION/LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION is defined at compilation time of the *application that is using libbpf*, not just libbpf's compilation time. And that's clearly a bogus assumption which we can't and shouldn't make. The right approach will be to define LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION/LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION in some sort of auto-generated header, included from libbpf_common.h and installed as part of libbpf package. Anyways, I've removed all the LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE stuff and applied all the rest, as it looks good and is a useful addition. We should work some more on deprecation helpers, though.
2021-07-29 17:31 UTC-0700 ~ Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 9:20 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> wrote: >> >> As part of the effort to move towards a v1.0 for libbpf [0], this set >> improves some confusing function names related to BTF loading from and to >> the kernel: >> >> - btf__load() becomes btf__load_into_kernel(). >> - btf__get_from_id becomes btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(). >> - A new version btf__load_from_kernel_by_id_split() extends the former to >> add support for split BTF. >> >> The old functions are marked for deprecation for the next minor version >> (0.6) of libbpf. >> >> The last patch is a trivial change to bpftool to add support for dumping >> split BTF objects by referencing them by their id (and not only by their >> BTF path). >> >> [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/wiki/Libbpf:-the-road-to-v1.0#btfh-apis >> >> v3: >> - Use libbpf_err_ptr() in btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(), ERR_PTR() in >> bpftool's get_map_kv_btf(). >> - Move the definition of btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() closer to the >> btf__parse() group in btf.h (move the legacy function with it). >> - Fix a bug on the return value in libbpf_find_prog_btf_id(), as a new >> patch. >> - Move the btf__free() fixes to their own patch. >> - Add "Fixes:" tags to relevant patches. >> - Re-introduce deprecation (removed in v2) for the legacy functions, as a >> new macro LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(major, minor, message). >> >> v2: >> - Remove deprecation marking of legacy functions (patch 4/6 from v1). >> - Make btf__load_from_kernel_by_id{,_split}() return the btf struct, adjust >> surrounding code and call btf__free() when missing. >> - Add new functions to v0.5.0 API (and not v0.6.0). >> >> Quentin Monnet (8): >> libbpf: return non-null error on failures in libbpf_find_prog_btf_id() >> libbpf: rename btf__load() as btf__load_into_kernel() >> libbpf: rename btf__get_from_id() as btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() >> tools: free BTF objects at various locations >> tools: replace btf__get_from_id() with btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() >> libbpf: prepare deprecation of btf__get_from_id(), btf__load() >> libbpf: add split BTF support for btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() >> tools: bpftool: support dumping split BTF by id >> >> tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c | 8 ++--- >> tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c | 6 ++-- >> tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 14 ++++----- >> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 29 +++++++++++------ >> tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 3 ++ >> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 33 ++++++++++++++------ >> tools/lib/bpf/btf.h | 7 ++++- >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 11 ++++--- >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 3 ++ >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h | 19 +++++++++++ >> tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c | 11 ++++--- >> tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c | 12 +++++-- >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 4 ++- >> 13 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.30.2 >> > > I dropped patch #7 with deprecations and LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE and > applied to bpf-next. > > Current LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE approach doesn't work (and you should > have caught this when you built selftests/bpf, what happened there?). > bpftool build generates warnings like this: > > In file included from /data/users/andriin/linux/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h:20, > from xlated_dumper.c:10: > /data/users/andriin/linux/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h:22:23: > warning: "LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION" is not defined, evaluates to 0 > [-Wundef] > __LIBBPF_GET_VERSION(LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION, LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Apologies, I didn't realise the change would impact external applications. > > And it makes total sense. LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE() assumes > LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION/LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION is defined at compilation > time of the *application that is using libbpf*, not just libbpf's > compilation time. And that's clearly a bogus assumption which we can't > and shouldn't make. The right approach will be to define > LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION/LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION in some sort of > auto-generated header, included from libbpf_common.h and installed as > part of libbpf package. So generating this header is easy. Installing it with the other headers is simple too. It becomes a bit trickier when we build outside of the directory (it seems I need to pass -I$(OUTPUT) to build libbpf). The step I'm most struggling with at the moment is bpftool, which bootstraps a first version of itself before building libbpf, by looking at the headers directly in libbpf's directory. It means that the generated header with the version number has not yet been generated. Do you think it is worth changing bpftool's build steps to implement this deprecation helper? Alternatively, wouldn't it make more sense to have a script in the GitHub repo for libbpf, and to run it once during the release process of a new version to update, say, the version number, or even the deprecation status directly? > > Anyways, I've removed all the LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE stuff and > applied all the rest, as it looks good and is a useful addition. Thanks. Quentin
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 8:23 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> wrote: > > 2021-07-29 17:31 UTC-0700 ~ Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 9:20 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> wrote: > >> > >> As part of the effort to move towards a v1.0 for libbpf [0], this set > >> improves some confusing function names related to BTF loading from and to > >> the kernel: > >> > >> - btf__load() becomes btf__load_into_kernel(). > >> - btf__get_from_id becomes btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(). > >> - A new version btf__load_from_kernel_by_id_split() extends the former to > >> add support for split BTF. > >> > >> The old functions are marked for deprecation for the next minor version > >> (0.6) of libbpf. > >> > >> The last patch is a trivial change to bpftool to add support for dumping > >> split BTF objects by referencing them by their id (and not only by their > >> BTF path). > >> > >> [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/wiki/Libbpf:-the-road-to-v1.0#btfh-apis > >> > >> v3: > >> - Use libbpf_err_ptr() in btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(), ERR_PTR() in > >> bpftool's get_map_kv_btf(). > >> - Move the definition of btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() closer to the > >> btf__parse() group in btf.h (move the legacy function with it). > >> - Fix a bug on the return value in libbpf_find_prog_btf_id(), as a new > >> patch. > >> - Move the btf__free() fixes to their own patch. > >> - Add "Fixes:" tags to relevant patches. > >> - Re-introduce deprecation (removed in v2) for the legacy functions, as a > >> new macro LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(major, minor, message). > >> > >> v2: > >> - Remove deprecation marking of legacy functions (patch 4/6 from v1). > >> - Make btf__load_from_kernel_by_id{,_split}() return the btf struct, adjust > >> surrounding code and call btf__free() when missing. > >> - Add new functions to v0.5.0 API (and not v0.6.0). > >> > >> Quentin Monnet (8): > >> libbpf: return non-null error on failures in libbpf_find_prog_btf_id() > >> libbpf: rename btf__load() as btf__load_into_kernel() > >> libbpf: rename btf__get_from_id() as btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() > >> tools: free BTF objects at various locations > >> tools: replace btf__get_from_id() with btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() > >> libbpf: prepare deprecation of btf__get_from_id(), btf__load() > >> libbpf: add split BTF support for btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() > >> tools: bpftool: support dumping split BTF by id > >> > >> tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c | 8 ++--- > >> tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c | 6 ++-- > >> tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 14 ++++----- > >> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 29 +++++++++++------ > >> tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 3 ++ > >> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 33 ++++++++++++++------ > >> tools/lib/bpf/btf.h | 7 ++++- > >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 11 ++++--- > >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 3 ++ > >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h | 19 +++++++++++ > >> tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c | 11 ++++--- > >> tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c | 12 +++++-- > >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 4 ++- > >> 13 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > >> > >> -- > >> 2.30.2 > >> > > > > I dropped patch #7 with deprecations and LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE and > > applied to bpf-next. > > > > Current LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE approach doesn't work (and you should > > have caught this when you built selftests/bpf, what happened there?). > > bpftool build generates warnings like this: > > > > In file included from /data/users/andriin/linux/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h:20, > > from xlated_dumper.c:10: > > /data/users/andriin/linux/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h:22:23: > > warning: "LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION" is not defined, evaluates to 0 > > [-Wundef] > > __LIBBPF_GET_VERSION(LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION, LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION) > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Apologies, I didn't realise the change would impact external applications. It doesn't matter, we expect everyone to compile selftest (just `make` in tools/testing/selftests/bpf) and run at least test_progs, preferably also test_maps and test_verifier. Especially with vmtest.sh script it's quite simple (once you get latest Clang and pahole compiled locally). We obviously have CI and maintainers as the last line of defense, but that should be the last line of defense, not the main line :) > > > > > And it makes total sense. LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE() assumes > > LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION/LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION is defined at compilation > > time of the *application that is using libbpf*, not just libbpf's > > compilation time. And that's clearly a bogus assumption which we can't > > and shouldn't make. The right approach will be to define > > LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION/LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION in some sort of > > auto-generated header, included from libbpf_common.h and installed as > > part of libbpf package. > > So generating this header is easy. Installing it with the other headers > is simple too. It becomes a bit trickier when we build outside of the > directory (it seems I need to pass -I$(OUTPUT) to build libbpf). Not sure why using the header is tricky. We auto-generate bpf_helper_defs.h, which is included from bpf_helpers.h, which is included in every single libbpf-using application. Works good with no extra magic. > > The step I'm most struggling with at the moment is bpftool, which > bootstraps a first version of itself before building libbpf, by looking > at the headers directly in libbpf's directory. It means that the > generated header with the version number has not yet been generated. Do > you think it is worth changing bpftool's build steps to implement this > deprecation helper? If it doesn't do that already, bpftool should do `make install` for libbpf, not just build. Install will put all the headers, generated or otherwise, into a designated destination folder, which should be passed as -I parameter. But that should be already happening due to bpf_helper_defs.h. > > Alternatively, wouldn't it make more sense to have a script in the > GitHub repo for libbpf, and to run it once during the release process of > a new version to update, say, the version number, or even the > deprecation status directly? I'd like to avoid extra manual steps that I or someone else will definitely forget from time to time. Again, taking bpf_helper_defs.h as a precedent. In the kernel repo we auto-generate it during build. But when we sync libbpf to Github, we copy and check-in bpf_helper_defs.h, so it's always available there (and will get installed on `make install` or during packaging). We should do the same for this new header (libbpf_version.h?). > > > > > Anyways, I've removed all the LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE stuff and > > applied all the rest, as it looks good and is a useful addition. > > Thanks. > Quentin
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 at 18:24, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > > > The right approach will be to define > > > LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION/LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION in some sort of > > > auto-generated header, included from libbpf_common.h and installed as > > > part of libbpf package. > > > > So generating this header is easy. Installing it with the other headers > > is simple too. It becomes a bit trickier when we build outside of the > > directory (it seems I need to pass -I$(OUTPUT) to build libbpf). > > Not sure why using the header is tricky. We auto-generate > bpf_helper_defs.h, which is included from bpf_helpers.h, which is > included in every single libbpf-using application. Works good with no > extra magic. bpf_helper_defs.h is the first thing I looked at, and I processed libbpf_version.h just like it. But there is a difference: bpf_helper_defs.h is _not_ included in libbpf itself, nor is it needed in bpftool at the bootstrap stage (it is only included from the eBPF skeletons for profiling or showing PIDs etc., which are compiled after libbpf). The version header is needed in both cases. > > > > > The step I'm most struggling with at the moment is bpftool, which > > bootstraps a first version of itself before building libbpf, by looking > > at the headers directly in libbpf's directory. It means that the > > generated header with the version number has not yet been generated. Do > > you think it is worth changing bpftool's build steps to implement this > > deprecation helper? > > If it doesn't do that already, bpftool should do `make install` for > libbpf, not just build. Install will put all the headers, generated or > otherwise, into a designated destination folder, which should be > passed as -I parameter. But that should be already happening due to > bpf_helper_defs.h. bpftool does not run "make install". It compiles libbpf passing "OUTPUT=$(LIBBPF_OUTPUT)", sets LIBBPF_PATH to the same directory, and then adds "-I$(LIBBPF_PATH)" for accessing bpf_helper_defs.h and compile its eBPF programs. It is possible to include libbpf_version.h the same way, but only after libbpf has been compiled, after the bootstrap. I'll look into updating the Makefile to compile and install libbpf before the bootstrap, when I have some time.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 1:23 PM Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 at 18:24, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote: > > [...] > > > > > The right approach will be to define > > > > LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION/LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION in some sort of > > > > auto-generated header, included from libbpf_common.h and installed as > > > > part of libbpf package. > > > > > > So generating this header is easy. Installing it with the other headers > > > is simple too. It becomes a bit trickier when we build outside of the > > > directory (it seems I need to pass -I$(OUTPUT) to build libbpf). > > > > Not sure why using the header is tricky. We auto-generate > > bpf_helper_defs.h, which is included from bpf_helpers.h, which is > > included in every single libbpf-using application. Works good with no > > extra magic. > > bpf_helper_defs.h is the first thing I looked at, and I processed > libbpf_version.h just like it. But there is a difference: > bpf_helper_defs.h is _not_ included in libbpf itself, nor is it needed > in bpftool at the bootstrap stage (it is only included from the eBPF > skeletons for profiling or showing PIDs etc., which are compiled after > libbpf). The version header is needed in both cases. Oh, in that sense. Yeah, sure, I didn't think that would qualify as tricky. But yeah, -I$(OUTPUT) or something along those lines is fine. > > > > > > > > > The step I'm most struggling with at the moment is bpftool, which > > > bootstraps a first version of itself before building libbpf, by looking > > > at the headers directly in libbpf's directory. It means that the > > > generated header with the version number has not yet been generated. Do > > > you think it is worth changing bpftool's build steps to implement this > > > deprecation helper? > > > > If it doesn't do that already, bpftool should do `make install` for > > libbpf, not just build. Install will put all the headers, generated or > > otherwise, into a designated destination folder, which should be > > passed as -I parameter. But that should be already happening due to > > bpf_helper_defs.h. > > bpftool does not run "make install". It compiles libbpf passing > "OUTPUT=$(LIBBPF_OUTPUT)", sets LIBBPF_PATH to the same directory, and > then adds "-I$(LIBBPF_PATH)" for accessing bpf_helper_defs.h and compile > its eBPF programs. It is possible to include libbpf_version.h the same > way, but only after libbpf has been compiled, after the bootstrap. > > I'll look into updating the Makefile to compile and install libbpf > before the bootstrap, when I have some time. Cool, `make install` is the best way as it prevents accidental usage of libbpf's internal header. So it's a good change to make.