Message ID | 106547ef-7a61-2064-33f5-3cc8d12adb34@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ethtool: runtime-resume netdev parent before ethtool ops | expand |
On 01.08.2021 12:35, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > If a network device is runtime-suspended then: > - network device may be flagged as detached and all ethtool ops (even if > not accessing the device) will fail because netif_device_present() > returns false > - ethtool ops may fail because device is not accessible (e.g. because being > in D3 in case of a PCI device) > > It may not be desirable that userspace can't use even simple ethtool ops > that not access the device if interface or link is down. To be more friendly > to userspace let's ensure that device is runtime-resumed when executing > ethtool ops in kernel. > > This patch series covers the typical case that the netdev parent is power- > managed, e.g. a PCI device. Not sure whether cases exist where the netdev > itself is power-managed. If yes then we may need an extension for this. > But the series as-is at least shouldn't cause problems in that case. > > Heiner Kallweit (4): > ethtool: runtime-resume netdev parent before ethtool ioctl ops > ethtool: move implementation of ethnl_ops_begin/complete to netlink.c > ethtool: move netif_device_present check from > ethnl_parse_header_dev_get to ethnl_ops_begin > ethtool: runtime-resume netdev parent in ethnl_ops_begin > > net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 18 ++++++++++++++--- > net/ethtool/netlink.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > net/ethtool/netlink.h | 15 ++------------- > 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > Patchwork is showing the following warning for all patches in the series. netdev/cc_maintainers warning 7 maintainers not CCed: ecree@solarflare.com andrew@lunn.ch magnus.karlsson@intel.com danieller@nvidia.com arnd@arndb.de irusskikh@marvell.com alexanderduyck@fb.com This seems to be a false positive, e.g. address ecree@solarflare.com doesn't exist at all in MAINTAINERS file.
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:25:52 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote: > Patchwork is showing the following warning for all patches in the series. > > netdev/cc_maintainers warning 7 maintainers not CCed: ecree@solarflare.com andrew@lunn.ch magnus.karlsson@intel.com danieller@nvidia.com arnd@arndb.de irusskikh@marvell.com alexanderduyck@fb.com > > This seems to be a false positive, e.g. address ecree@solarflare.com > doesn't exist at all in MAINTAINERS file. It gets the list from the get_maintainers script. It's one of the less reliable tests, but I feel like efforts should be made primarily towards improving get_maintainers rather than improving the test itself.
On 02.08.2021 16:15, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:25:52 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> Patchwork is showing the following warning for all patches in the series. >> >> netdev/cc_maintainers warning 7 maintainers not CCed: ecree@solarflare.com andrew@lunn.ch magnus.karlsson@intel.com danieller@nvidia.com arnd@arndb.de irusskikh@marvell.com alexanderduyck@fb.com >> >> This seems to be a false positive, e.g. address ecree@solarflare.com >> doesn't exist at all in MAINTAINERS file. > > It gets the list from the get_maintainers script. It's one of the less > reliable tests, but I feel like efforts should be made primarily > towards improving get_maintainers rather than improving the test itself. > When running get_maintainers.pl for any of the patches in the series I don't get these addresses. I run get_maintainers w/o options, maybe you set some special option? That's what I get when running get_maintainers: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%,added_lines:3144/3159=100%) Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%,removed_lines:3/3=100%) netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:42:28 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote: > On 02.08.2021 16:15, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:25:52 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >> Patchwork is showing the following warning for all patches in the series. > >> > >> netdev/cc_maintainers warning 7 maintainers not CCed: ecree@solarflare.com andrew@lunn.ch magnus.karlsson@intel.com danieller@nvidia.com arnd@arndb.de irusskikh@marvell.com alexanderduyck@fb.com > >> > >> This seems to be a false positive, e.g. address ecree@solarflare.com > >> doesn't exist at all in MAINTAINERS file. > > > > It gets the list from the get_maintainers script. It's one of the less > > reliable tests, but I feel like efforts should be made primarily > > towards improving get_maintainers rather than improving the test itself. > > > When running get_maintainers.pl for any of the patches in the series > I don't get these addresses. I run get_maintainers w/o options, maybe > you set some special option? That's what I get when running get_maintainers: > > "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) > Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%,added_lines:3144/3159=100%) > Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%,removed_lines:3/3=100%) > netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Mm. Maybe your system doesn't have some perl module? Not sure what it may be. With tip of net-next/master: $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl /tmp/te/0002-ethtool-move-implementation-of-ethnl_ops_begin-compl.patch "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL],commit_signer:12/16=75%,commit_signer:15/18=83%) Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL],commit_signer:11/16=69%,authored:9/16=56%,added_lines:127/198=64%,removed_lines:41/57=72%,commit_signer:14/18=78%,authored:11/18=61%,added_lines:74/84=88%,removed_lines:35/52=67%) Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> (commit_signer:3/16=19%,authored:3/16=19%,added_lines:46/198=23%,removed_lines:13/57=23%,authored:1/18=6%,removed_lines:13/52=25%) Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@riseup.net> (commit_signer:1/16=6%,authored:1/16=6%) Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@nvidia.com> (commit_signer:1/16=6%,added_lines:11/198=6%,commit_signer:1/18=6%) Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com> (authored:1/16=6%,added_lines:10/198=5%,authored:1/18=6%) Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> (authored:1/16=6%) Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com> (commit_signer:1/18=6%) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> (commit_signer:1/18=6%) Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com> (authored:1/18=6%) Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> (authored:1/18=6%) netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
On 02.08.2021 18:54, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:42:28 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> On 02.08.2021 16:15, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>> On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:25:52 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote: >>>> Patchwork is showing the following warning for all patches in the series. >>>> >>>> netdev/cc_maintainers warning 7 maintainers not CCed: ecree@solarflare.com andrew@lunn.ch magnus.karlsson@intel.com danieller@nvidia.com arnd@arndb.de irusskikh@marvell.com alexanderduyck@fb.com >>>> >>>> This seems to be a false positive, e.g. address ecree@solarflare.com >>>> doesn't exist at all in MAINTAINERS file. >>> >>> It gets the list from the get_maintainers script. It's one of the less >>> reliable tests, but I feel like efforts should be made primarily >>> towards improving get_maintainers rather than improving the test itself. >>> >> When running get_maintainers.pl for any of the patches in the series >> I don't get these addresses. I run get_maintainers w/o options, maybe >> you set some special option? That's what I get when running get_maintainers: >> >> "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) >> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) >> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%,added_lines:3144/3159=100%) >> Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%,removed_lines:3/3=100%) >> netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) > > Mm. Maybe your system doesn't have some perl module? Not sure what it > may be. With tip of net-next/master: > > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl /tmp/te/0002-ethtool-move-implementation-of-ethnl_ops_begin-compl.patch > "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL],commit_signer:12/16=75%,commit_signer:15/18=83%) > Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL],commit_signer:11/16=69%,authored:9/16=56%,added_lines:127/198=64%,removed_lines:41/57=72%,commit_signer:14/18=78%,authored:11/18=61%,added_lines:74/84=88%,removed_lines:35/52=67%) > Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> (commit_signer:3/16=19%,authored:3/16=19%,added_lines:46/198=23%,removed_lines:13/57=23%,authored:1/18=6%,removed_lines:13/52=25%) > Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@riseup.net> (commit_signer:1/16=6%,authored:1/16=6%) > Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@nvidia.com> (commit_signer:1/16=6%,added_lines:11/198=6%,commit_signer:1/18=6%) > Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com> (authored:1/16=6%,added_lines:10/198=5%,authored:1/18=6%) > Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> (authored:1/16=6%) > Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com> (commit_signer:1/18=6%) > Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> (commit_signer:1/18=6%) > Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com> (authored:1/18=6%) > Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> (authored:1/18=6%) > netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) > Ah, maybe it's because I typically don't work with the full git repo but just do a "git clone --depth 1".
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master): On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 12:35:18 +0200 you wrote: > If a network device is runtime-suspended then: > - network device may be flagged as detached and all ethtool ops (even if > not accessing the device) will fail because netif_device_present() > returns false > - ethtool ops may fail because device is not accessible (e.g. because being > in D3 in case of a PCI device) > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next,1/4] ethtool: runtime-resume netdev parent before ethtool ioctl ops https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f32a21376573 - [net-next,2/4] ethtool: move implementation of ethnl_ops_begin/complete to netlink.c https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c5ab51df03e2 - [net-next,3/4] ethtool: move netif_device_present check from ethnl_parse_header_dev_get to ethnl_ops_begin https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/41107ac22fcf - [net-next,4/4] ethtool: runtime-resume netdev parent in ethnl_ops_begin https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d43c65b05b84 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html