| Message ID | 20210804154712.929986-2-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Bluetooth: fix locking and socket killing in SCO and RFCOMM | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
| netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
| netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be net-next |
| netdev/subject_prefix | warning | Target tree name not specified in the subject |
| netdev/cc_maintainers | success | CCed 7 of 7 maintainers |
| netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
| netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
| netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 84 lines checked |
| netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
Hi Desmond, On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 8:48 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> wrote: > > struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, > SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. > > This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in > an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes > a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as > sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts > enabled. > > This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could > lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: > CPU0 > ---- > lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); > <Interrupt> > lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); > > To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts > instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in > an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. > > As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of > cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and > sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to > bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to > synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since > sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under > the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), > cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an > sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But > sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. > > Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not > change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference > between: > 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another > timeout > 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. > > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] > Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> > --- > net/bluetooth/sco.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/sco.c b/net/bluetooth/sco.c > index ffa2a77a3e4c..89cb987ca9eb 100644 > --- a/net/bluetooth/sco.c > +++ b/net/bluetooth/sco.c > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ struct sco_conn { > spinlock_t lock; > struct sock *sk; > > + struct delayed_work timeout_work; > + > unsigned int mtu; > }; > > @@ -74,9 +76,20 @@ struct sco_pinfo { > #define SCO_CONN_TIMEOUT (HZ * 40) > #define SCO_DISCONN_TIMEOUT (HZ * 2) > > -static void sco_sock_timeout(struct timer_list *t) > +static void sco_sock_timeout(struct work_struct *work) > { > - struct sock *sk = from_timer(sk, t, sk_timer); > + struct sco_conn *conn = container_of(work, struct sco_conn, > + timeout_work.work); > + struct sock *sk; > + > + sco_conn_lock(conn); > + sk = conn->sk; > + if (sk) > + sock_hold(sk); > + sco_conn_unlock(conn); > + > + if (!sk) > + return; > > BT_DBG("sock %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state); > > @@ -91,14 +104,27 @@ static void sco_sock_timeout(struct timer_list *t) > > static void sco_sock_set_timer(struct sock *sk, long timeout) > { > + struct delayed_work *work; Minor nitpick but I don't think using a dedicated variable here makes much sense. > + if (!sco_pi(sk)->conn) > + return; > + work = &sco_pi(sk)->conn->timeout_work; > + > BT_DBG("sock %p state %d timeout %ld", sk, sk->sk_state, timeout); > - sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, jiffies + timeout); > + cancel_delayed_work(work); > + schedule_delayed_work(work, timeout); > } > > static void sco_sock_clear_timer(struct sock *sk) > { > + struct delayed_work *work; Ditto. > + if (!sco_pi(sk)->conn) > + return; > + work = &sco_pi(sk)->conn->timeout_work; > + > BT_DBG("sock %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state); > - sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer); > + cancel_delayed_work(work); > } > > /* ---- SCO connections ---- */ > @@ -179,6 +205,9 @@ static void sco_conn_del(struct hci_conn *hcon, int err) > bh_unlock_sock(sk); > sco_sock_kill(sk); > sock_put(sk); > + > + /* Ensure no more work items will run before freeing conn. */ > + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&conn->timeout_work); > } > > hcon->sco_data = NULL; > @@ -193,6 +222,8 @@ static void __sco_chan_add(struct sco_conn *conn, struct sock *sk, > sco_pi(sk)->conn = conn; > conn->sk = sk; > > + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&conn->timeout_work, sco_sock_timeout); > + > if (parent) > bt_accept_enqueue(parent, sk, true); > } > @@ -500,8 +531,6 @@ static struct sock *sco_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, > > sco_pi(sk)->setting = BT_VOICE_CVSD_16BIT; > > - timer_setup(&sk->sk_timer, sco_sock_timeout, 0); > - > bt_sock_link(&sco_sk_list, sk); > return sk; > } > -- > 2.25.1 >
On 6/8/21 3:06 am, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > Hi Desmond, > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 8:48 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi > <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, >> SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. >> >> This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in >> an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes >> a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as >> sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts >> enabled. >> >> This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could >> lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: >> CPU0 >> ---- >> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); >> <Interrupt> >> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); >> >> To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts >> instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in >> an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. >> >> As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of >> cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and >> sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to >> bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to >> synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since >> sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under >> the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), >> cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an >> sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But >> sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. >> >> Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not >> change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference >> between: >> 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another >> timeout >> 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. >> >> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] >> Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com >> Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com >> Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> >> --- >> net/bluetooth/sco.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/sco.c b/net/bluetooth/sco.c >> index ffa2a77a3e4c..89cb987ca9eb 100644 >> --- a/net/bluetooth/sco.c >> +++ b/net/bluetooth/sco.c >> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ struct sco_conn { >> spinlock_t lock; >> struct sock *sk; >> >> + struct delayed_work timeout_work; >> + >> unsigned int mtu; >> }; >> >> @@ -74,9 +76,20 @@ struct sco_pinfo { >> #define SCO_CONN_TIMEOUT (HZ * 40) >> #define SCO_DISCONN_TIMEOUT (HZ * 2) >> >> -static void sco_sock_timeout(struct timer_list *t) >> +static void sco_sock_timeout(struct work_struct *work) >> { >> - struct sock *sk = from_timer(sk, t, sk_timer); >> + struct sco_conn *conn = container_of(work, struct sco_conn, >> + timeout_work.work); >> + struct sock *sk; >> + >> + sco_conn_lock(conn); >> + sk = conn->sk; >> + if (sk) >> + sock_hold(sk); >> + sco_conn_unlock(conn); >> + >> + if (!sk) >> + return; >> >> BT_DBG("sock %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state); >> >> @@ -91,14 +104,27 @@ static void sco_sock_timeout(struct timer_list *t) >> >> static void sco_sock_set_timer(struct sock *sk, long timeout) >> { >> + struct delayed_work *work; > > Minor nitpick but I don't think using a dedicated variable here makes > much sense. > Thanks for the feedback, Luiz. Agreed, I can make the change in the next version of the series after the other patches are reviewed. Best wishes, Desmond >> + if (!sco_pi(sk)->conn) >> + return; >> + work = &sco_pi(sk)->conn->timeout_work; >> + >> BT_DBG("sock %p state %d timeout %ld", sk, sk->sk_state, timeout); >> - sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, jiffies + timeout); >> + cancel_delayed_work(work); >> + schedule_delayed_work(work, timeout); >> } >> >> static void sco_sock_clear_timer(struct sock *sk) >> { >> + struct delayed_work *work; > > Ditto. > >> + if (!sco_pi(sk)->conn) >> + return; >> + work = &sco_pi(sk)->conn->timeout_work; >> + >> BT_DBG("sock %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state); >> - sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer); >> + cancel_delayed_work(work); >> } >> >> /* ---- SCO connections ---- */ >> @@ -179,6 +205,9 @@ static void sco_conn_del(struct hci_conn *hcon, int err) >> bh_unlock_sock(sk); >> sco_sock_kill(sk); >> sock_put(sk); >> + >> + /* Ensure no more work items will run before freeing conn. */ >> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&conn->timeout_work); >> } >> >> hcon->sco_data = NULL; >> @@ -193,6 +222,8 @@ static void __sco_chan_add(struct sco_conn *conn, struct sock *sk, >> sco_pi(sk)->conn = conn; >> conn->sk = sk; >> >> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&conn->timeout_work, sco_sock_timeout); >> + >> if (parent) >> bt_accept_enqueue(parent, sk, true); >> } >> @@ -500,8 +531,6 @@ static struct sock *sco_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, >> >> sco_pi(sk)->setting = BT_VOICE_CVSD_16BIT; >> >> - timer_setup(&sk->sk_timer, sco_sock_timeout, 0); >> - >> bt_sock_link(&sco_sk_list, sk); >> return sk; >> } >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> > >
Hi Desmond, On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 9:04 PM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 6/8/21 3:06 am, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > > Hi Desmond, > > > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 8:48 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi > > <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, > >> SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. > >> > >> This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in > >> an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes > >> a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as > >> sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts > >> enabled. > >> > >> This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could > >> lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: > >> CPU0 > >> ---- > >> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); > >> <Interrupt> > >> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); > >> > >> To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts > >> instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in > >> an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. > >> > >> As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of > >> cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and > >> sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to > >> bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to > >> synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since > >> sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under > >> the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), > >> cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an > >> sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But > >> sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. > >> > >> Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not > >> change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference > >> between: > >> 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another > >> timeout > >> 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. > >> > >> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] > >> Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > >> Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > >> Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> net/bluetooth/sco.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > >> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/sco.c b/net/bluetooth/sco.c > >> index ffa2a77a3e4c..89cb987ca9eb 100644 > >> --- a/net/bluetooth/sco.c > >> +++ b/net/bluetooth/sco.c > >> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ struct sco_conn { > >> spinlock_t lock; > >> struct sock *sk; > >> > >> + struct delayed_work timeout_work; > >> + > >> unsigned int mtu; > >> }; > >> > >> @@ -74,9 +76,20 @@ struct sco_pinfo { > >> #define SCO_CONN_TIMEOUT (HZ * 40) > >> #define SCO_DISCONN_TIMEOUT (HZ * 2) > >> > >> -static void sco_sock_timeout(struct timer_list *t) > >> +static void sco_sock_timeout(struct work_struct *work) > >> { > >> - struct sock *sk = from_timer(sk, t, sk_timer); > >> + struct sco_conn *conn = container_of(work, struct sco_conn, > >> + timeout_work.work); > >> + struct sock *sk; > >> + > >> + sco_conn_lock(conn); > >> + sk = conn->sk; > >> + if (sk) > >> + sock_hold(sk); > >> + sco_conn_unlock(conn); > >> + > >> + if (!sk) > >> + return; > >> > >> BT_DBG("sock %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state); > >> > >> @@ -91,14 +104,27 @@ static void sco_sock_timeout(struct timer_list *t) > >> > >> static void sco_sock_set_timer(struct sock *sk, long timeout) > >> { > >> + struct delayed_work *work; > > > > Minor nitpick but I don't think using a dedicated variable here makes > > much sense. > > > > Thanks for the feedback, Luiz. Agreed, I can make the change in the next > version of the series after the other patches are reviewed. Others look good, so please go ahead and send the new version once you address these comments. > Best wishes, > Desmond > > >> + if (!sco_pi(sk)->conn) > >> + return; > >> + work = &sco_pi(sk)->conn->timeout_work; > >> + > >> BT_DBG("sock %p state %d timeout %ld", sk, sk->sk_state, timeout); > >> - sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, jiffies + timeout); > >> + cancel_delayed_work(work); > >> + schedule_delayed_work(work, timeout); > >> } > >> > >> static void sco_sock_clear_timer(struct sock *sk) > >> { > >> + struct delayed_work *work; > > > > Ditto. > > > >> + if (!sco_pi(sk)->conn) > >> + return; > >> + work = &sco_pi(sk)->conn->timeout_work; > >> + > >> BT_DBG("sock %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state); > >> - sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer); > >> + cancel_delayed_work(work); > >> } > >> > >> /* ---- SCO connections ---- */ > >> @@ -179,6 +205,9 @@ static void sco_conn_del(struct hci_conn *hcon, int err) > >> bh_unlock_sock(sk); > >> sco_sock_kill(sk); > >> sock_put(sk); > >> + > >> + /* Ensure no more work items will run before freeing conn. */ > >> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&conn->timeout_work); > >> } > >> > >> hcon->sco_data = NULL; > >> @@ -193,6 +222,8 @@ static void __sco_chan_add(struct sco_conn *conn, struct sock *sk, > >> sco_pi(sk)->conn = conn; > >> conn->sk = sk; > >> > >> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&conn->timeout_work, sco_sock_timeout); > >> + > >> if (parent) > >> bt_accept_enqueue(parent, sk, true); > >> } > >> @@ -500,8 +531,6 @@ static struct sock *sco_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, > >> > >> sco_pi(sk)->setting = BT_VOICE_CVSD_16BIT; > >> > >> - timer_setup(&sk->sk_timer, sco_sock_timeout, 0); > >> - > >> bt_sock_link(&sco_sk_list, sk); > >> return sk; > >> } > >> -- > >> 2.25.1 > >> > > > > >
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/sco.c b/net/bluetooth/sco.c index ffa2a77a3e4c..89cb987ca9eb 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/sco.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/sco.c @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ struct sco_conn { spinlock_t lock; struct sock *sk; + struct delayed_work timeout_work; + unsigned int mtu; }; @@ -74,9 +76,20 @@ struct sco_pinfo { #define SCO_CONN_TIMEOUT (HZ * 40) #define SCO_DISCONN_TIMEOUT (HZ * 2) -static void sco_sock_timeout(struct timer_list *t) +static void sco_sock_timeout(struct work_struct *work) { - struct sock *sk = from_timer(sk, t, sk_timer); + struct sco_conn *conn = container_of(work, struct sco_conn, + timeout_work.work); + struct sock *sk; + + sco_conn_lock(conn); + sk = conn->sk; + if (sk) + sock_hold(sk); + sco_conn_unlock(conn); + + if (!sk) + return; BT_DBG("sock %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state); @@ -91,14 +104,27 @@ static void sco_sock_timeout(struct timer_list *t) static void sco_sock_set_timer(struct sock *sk, long timeout) { + struct delayed_work *work; + + if (!sco_pi(sk)->conn) + return; + work = &sco_pi(sk)->conn->timeout_work; + BT_DBG("sock %p state %d timeout %ld", sk, sk->sk_state, timeout); - sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, jiffies + timeout); + cancel_delayed_work(work); + schedule_delayed_work(work, timeout); } static void sco_sock_clear_timer(struct sock *sk) { + struct delayed_work *work; + + if (!sco_pi(sk)->conn) + return; + work = &sco_pi(sk)->conn->timeout_work; + BT_DBG("sock %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state); - sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer); + cancel_delayed_work(work); } /* ---- SCO connections ---- */ @@ -179,6 +205,9 @@ static void sco_conn_del(struct hci_conn *hcon, int err) bh_unlock_sock(sk); sco_sock_kill(sk); sock_put(sk); + + /* Ensure no more work items will run before freeing conn. */ + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&conn->timeout_work); } hcon->sco_data = NULL; @@ -193,6 +222,8 @@ static void __sco_chan_add(struct sco_conn *conn, struct sock *sk, sco_pi(sk)->conn = conn; conn->sk = sk; + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&conn->timeout_work, sco_sock_timeout); + if (parent) bt_accept_enqueue(parent, sk, true); } @@ -500,8 +531,6 @@ static struct sock *sco_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, sco_pi(sk)->setting = BT_VOICE_CVSD_16BIT; - timer_setup(&sk->sk_timer, sco_sock_timeout, 0); - bt_sock_link(&sco_sk_list, sk); return sk; }
struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts enabled. This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); <Interrupt> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference between: 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another timeout 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> --- net/bluetooth/sco.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)