diff mbox series

[3/3] can: mscan: mpc5xxx_can: Use of_device_get_match_data to simplify code

Message ID 20210823113338.3568-4-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com (mailing list archive)
State Awaiting Upstream
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series net: Use of_device_get_match_data to simplify code | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/subject_prefix warning Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 1 maintainers not CCed: wsa@kernel.org
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 19 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link

Commit Message

Tang Bin Aug. 23, 2021, 11:33 a.m. UTC
Retrieve OF match data, it's better and cleaner to use
'of_device_get_match_data' over 'of_match_device'.

Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
 drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Marc Kleine-Budde Aug. 23, 2021, 12:37 p.m. UTC | #1
On 23.08.2021 19:33:38, Tang Bin wrote:
> Retrieve OF match data, it's better and cleaner to use
> 'of_device_get_match_data' over 'of_match_device'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>

Thanks for the patch!

LGTM, comment inside.

> ---
>  drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
> index e254e04ae..3b7465acd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
> @@ -279,7 +279,6 @@ static u32 mpc512x_can_get_clock(struct platform_device *ofdev,
>  static const struct of_device_id mpc5xxx_can_table[];
>  static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>  {
> -	const struct of_device_id *match;
>  	const struct mpc5xxx_can_data *data;
>  	struct device_node *np = ofdev->dev.of_node;
>  	struct net_device *dev;
> @@ -289,10 +288,9 @@ static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>  	int irq, mscan_clksrc = 0;
>  	int err = -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	match = of_match_device(mpc5xxx_can_table, &ofdev->dev);
> -	if (!match)
> +	data = of_device_get_match_data(&ofdev->dev);
> +	if (!data)
>  		return -EINVAL;

Please remove the "BUG_ON(!data)", which comes later.

> -	data = match->data;
>  
>  	base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>  	if (!base) {
> -- 
> 2.20.1.windows.1
> 
> 
> 
> 

regards,
Marc
Tang Bin Aug. 23, 2021, 1:52 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Marc:

On 2021/8/23 20:37, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 23.08.2021 19:33:38, Tang Bin wrote:
>> Retrieve OF match data, it's better and cleaner to use
>> 'of_device_get_match_data' over 'of_match_device'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> LGTM, comment inside.
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c | 6 ++----
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
>> index e254e04ae..3b7465acd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
>> @@ -279,7 +279,6 @@ static u32 mpc512x_can_get_clock(struct platform_device *ofdev,
>>   static const struct of_device_id mpc5xxx_can_table[];
>>   static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>>   {
>> -	const struct of_device_id *match;
>>   	const struct mpc5xxx_can_data *data;
>>   	struct device_node *np = ofdev->dev.of_node;
>>   	struct net_device *dev;
>> @@ -289,10 +288,9 @@ static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>>   	int irq, mscan_clksrc = 0;
>>   	int err = -ENOMEM;
>>   
>> -	match = of_match_device(mpc5xxx_can_table, &ofdev->dev);
>> -	if (!match)
>> +	data = of_device_get_match_data(&ofdev->dev);
>> +	if (!data)
>>   		return -EINVAL;
> Please remove the "BUG_ON(!data)", which comes later.

For this place, may I send another patch to fix this 'BUG_ON()' by 
itself, not in this patch series?

Thanks

Tang Bin

>
>> -	data = match->data;
>>   
>>   	base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>>   	if (!base) {
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1.windows.1
>>
>>
>>
>>
> regards,
> Marc
>
Marc Kleine-Budde Aug. 23, 2021, 1:54 p.m. UTC | #3
On 23.08.2021 21:52:03, tangbin wrote:
> On 2021/8/23 20:37, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 23.08.2021 19:33:38, Tang Bin wrote:
> > > Retrieve OF match data, it's better and cleaner to use
> > > 'of_device_get_match_data' over 'of_match_device'.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> > Thanks for the patch!
> > 
> > LGTM, comment inside.

Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

> > 
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c | 6 ++----
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
> > > index e254e04ae..3b7465acd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
> > > @@ -279,7 +279,6 @@ static u32 mpc512x_can_get_clock(struct platform_device *ofdev,
> > >   static const struct of_device_id mpc5xxx_can_table[];
> > >   static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> > >   {
> > > -	const struct of_device_id *match;
> > >   	const struct mpc5xxx_can_data *data;
> > >   	struct device_node *np = ofdev->dev.of_node;
> > >   	struct net_device *dev;
> > > @@ -289,10 +288,9 @@ static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> > >   	int irq, mscan_clksrc = 0;
> > >   	int err = -ENOMEM;
> > > -	match = of_match_device(mpc5xxx_can_table, &ofdev->dev);
> > > -	if (!match)
> > > +	data = of_device_get_match_data(&ofdev->dev);
> > > +	if (!data)
> > >   		return -EINVAL;
> > Please remove the "BUG_ON(!data)", which comes later.
> 
> For this place, may I send another patch to fix this 'BUG_ON()' by itself,
> not in this patch series?

Ok, fine with me.

regards,
Marc
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
index e254e04ae..3b7465acd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
@@ -279,7 +279,6 @@  static u32 mpc512x_can_get_clock(struct platform_device *ofdev,
 static const struct of_device_id mpc5xxx_can_table[];
 static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
 {
-	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	const struct mpc5xxx_can_data *data;
 	struct device_node *np = ofdev->dev.of_node;
 	struct net_device *dev;
@@ -289,10 +288,9 @@  static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
 	int irq, mscan_clksrc = 0;
 	int err = -ENOMEM;
 
-	match = of_match_device(mpc5xxx_can_table, &ofdev->dev);
-	if (!match)
+	data = of_device_get_match_data(&ofdev->dev);
+	if (!data)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	data = match->data;
 
 	base = of_iomap(np, 0);
 	if (!base) {