Message ID | 20210826133424.3362-6-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev() | expand |
On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:34:15 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU > +static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev) > { > struct iommu_group *iommu_group; > struct vfio_group *group; > + int ret; > + > + iommu_group = iommu_group_alloc(); > + if (IS_ERR(iommu_group)) > + return ERR_CAST(iommu_group); > > - iommu_group = vfio_iommu_group_get(dev); > + iommu_group_set_name(iommu_group, "vfio-noiommu"); > + iommu_group_set_iommudata(iommu_group, &noiommu, NULL); > + ret = iommu_group_add_device(iommu_group, dev); > + if (ret) > + goto out_put_group; > + > + group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group); > + if (IS_ERR(group)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(group); > + goto out_remove_device; > + } > + > + return group; > + > +out_remove_device: > + iommu_group_remove_device(dev); > +out_put_group: > + iommu_group_put(iommu_group); > + return ERR_PTR(ret); > +} > +#endif > + > +static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct iommu_group *iommu_group; > + struct vfio_group *group; > + > + iommu_group = iommu_group_get(dev); > +#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU > + if (!iommu_group && noiommu && !iommu_present(dev->bus)) { > + /* > + * With noiommu enabled, create an IOMMU group for devices that > + * don't already have one and don't have an iommu_ops on their > + * bus. Taint the kernel because we're about to give a DMA > + * capable device to a user without IOMMU protection. > + */ > + group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(dev); > + if (group) { > + add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); > + dev_warn(dev, "Adding kernel taint for vfio-noiommu group on device\n"); > + } Perhaps what Kevin was pointing out here in the previous version, vfio_noiommu_group_alloc() returns a pointer, so this should test !IS_ERR(group). Thanks, Alex
> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 6:47 AM > > On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:34:15 +0200 > Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU > > +static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev) > > { > > struct iommu_group *iommu_group; > > struct vfio_group *group; > > + int ret; > > + > > + iommu_group = iommu_group_alloc(); > > + if (IS_ERR(iommu_group)) > > + return ERR_CAST(iommu_group); > > > > - iommu_group = vfio_iommu_group_get(dev); > > + iommu_group_set_name(iommu_group, "vfio-noiommu"); > > + iommu_group_set_iommudata(iommu_group, &noiommu, NULL); > > + ret = iommu_group_add_device(iommu_group, dev); > > + if (ret) > > + goto out_put_group; > > + > > + group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group); > > + if (IS_ERR(group)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(group); > > + goto out_remove_device; > > + } > > + > > + return group; > > + > > +out_remove_device: > > + iommu_group_remove_device(dev); > > +out_put_group: > > + iommu_group_put(iommu_group); > > + return ERR_PTR(ret); > > +} > > +#endif > > + > > +static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev) > > +{ > > + struct iommu_group *iommu_group; > > + struct vfio_group *group; > > + > > + iommu_group = iommu_group_get(dev); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU > > + if (!iommu_group && noiommu && !iommu_present(dev->bus)) { > > + /* > > + * With noiommu enabled, create an IOMMU group for > devices that > > + * don't already have one and don't have an iommu_ops on > their > > + * bus. Taint the kernel because we're about to give a DMA > > + * capable device to a user without IOMMU protection. > > + */ > > + group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(dev); > > + if (group) { > > + add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); > > + dev_warn(dev, "Adding kernel taint for vfio- > noiommu group on device\n"); > > + } > > Perhaps what Kevin was pointing out here in the previous version, > vfio_noiommu_group_alloc() returns a pointer, so this should test > !IS_ERR(group). Thanks, > yes, that is what I meant.
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c index 852fe22125520d..109d3ef57665b0 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c @@ -169,50 +169,6 @@ static void vfio_release_device_set(struct vfio_device *device) xa_unlock(&vfio_device_set_xa); } -static struct iommu_group *vfio_iommu_group_get(struct device *dev) -{ - struct iommu_group *group; - int __maybe_unused ret; - - group = iommu_group_get(dev); - -#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU - /* - * With noiommu enabled, an IOMMU group will be created for a device - * that doesn't already have one and doesn't have an iommu_ops on their - * bus. We set iommudata simply to be able to identify these groups - * as special use and for reclamation later. - */ - if (group || !noiommu || iommu_present(dev->bus)) - return group; - - group = iommu_group_alloc(); - if (IS_ERR(group)) - return NULL; - - iommu_group_set_name(group, "vfio-noiommu"); - iommu_group_set_iommudata(group, &noiommu, NULL); - ret = iommu_group_add_device(group, dev); - if (ret) { - iommu_group_put(group); - return NULL; - } - - /* - * Where to taint? At this point we've added an IOMMU group for a - * device that is not backed by iommu_ops, therefore any iommu_ - * callback using iommu_ops can legitimately Oops. So, while we may - * be about to give a DMA capable device to a user without IOMMU - * protection, which is clearly taint-worthy, let's go ahead and do - * it here. - */ - add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); - dev_warn(dev, "Adding kernel taint for vfio-noiommu group on device\n"); -#endif - - return group; -} - #ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU static void *vfio_noiommu_open(unsigned long arg) { @@ -823,12 +779,61 @@ void vfio_uninit_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_uninit_group_dev); -struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev) +#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU +static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev) { struct iommu_group *iommu_group; struct vfio_group *group; + int ret; + + iommu_group = iommu_group_alloc(); + if (IS_ERR(iommu_group)) + return ERR_CAST(iommu_group); - iommu_group = vfio_iommu_group_get(dev); + iommu_group_set_name(iommu_group, "vfio-noiommu"); + iommu_group_set_iommudata(iommu_group, &noiommu, NULL); + ret = iommu_group_add_device(iommu_group, dev); + if (ret) + goto out_put_group; + + group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group); + if (IS_ERR(group)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(group); + goto out_remove_device; + } + + return group; + +out_remove_device: + iommu_group_remove_device(dev); +out_put_group: + iommu_group_put(iommu_group); + return ERR_PTR(ret); +} +#endif + +static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev) +{ + struct iommu_group *iommu_group; + struct vfio_group *group; + + iommu_group = iommu_group_get(dev); +#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU + if (!iommu_group && noiommu && !iommu_present(dev->bus)) { + /* + * With noiommu enabled, create an IOMMU group for devices that + * don't already have one and don't have an iommu_ops on their + * bus. Taint the kernel because we're about to give a DMA + * capable device to a user without IOMMU protection. + */ + group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(dev); + if (group) { + add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); + dev_warn(dev, "Adding kernel taint for vfio-noiommu group on device\n"); + } + return group; + } +#endif if (!iommu_group) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); @@ -844,10 +849,6 @@ struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev) return group; out_put: -#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU - if (iommu_group_get_iommudata(iommu_group) == &noiommu) - iommu_group_remove_device(dev); -#endif iommu_group_put(iommu_group); return group; }