diff mbox series

[net-next,1/2] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: support bridge offloading

Message ID 20210829002601.282521-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net-next,1/2] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: support bridge offloading | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 8 of 8 maintainers
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 108 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link

Commit Message

Linus Walleij Aug. 29, 2021, 12:26 a.m. UTC 
From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>

Use port isolation registers to configure bridge offloading.

Tested on the D-Link DIR-685, switching between ports and
sniffing ports to make sure no packets leak.

Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)

Comments

Vladimir Oltean Aug. 30, 2021, 8:12 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 02:26:00AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
> 
> Use port isolation registers to configure bridge offloading.
> 
> Tested on the D-Link DIR-685, switching between ports and
> sniffing ports to make sure no packets leak.
> 
> Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
> Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
> Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
> index a89093bc6c6a..14939188c108 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
> @@ -300,6 +300,12 @@
>  #define RTL8366RB_INTERRUPT_STATUS_REG	0x0442
>  #define RTL8366RB_NUM_INTERRUPT		14 /* 0..13 */
>  
> +/* Port isolation registers */
> +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_BASE		0x0F08
> +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(pnum)	(RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_BASE + (pnum))
> +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN		BIT(0)
> +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK	GENMASK(7, 1)

If RTL8366RB_NUM_PORTS is 6, then why is RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK a
7-bit field?

> +
>  /* bits 0..5 enable force when cleared */
>  #define RTL8366RB_MAC_FORCE_CTRL_REG	0x0F11
>  
> @@ -835,6 +841,21 @@ static int rtl8366rb_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	/* Isolate all user ports so only the CPU port can access them */
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU; i++) {
> +		ret = regmap_write(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(i),
> +				   RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN |
> +				   BIT(RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU + 1));

The shifting due to RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN looks weird, I can see it
being mishandled in the future, with code moved around, copied and
pasted between realtek drivers and such. How about making a macro

#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS(x)	((x) << 1)

> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +	/* CPU port can access all ports */

Except itself maybe? RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU is 5, so maybe use something
like

RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS(dsa_user_ports(ds))

> +	ret = regmap_write(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU),
> +			   RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK |
> +			   RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	/* Set up the "green ethernet" feature */
>  	ret = rtl8366rb_jam_table(rtl8366rb_green_jam,
>  				  ARRAY_SIZE(rtl8366rb_green_jam), smi, false);
> @@ -1127,6 +1148,67 @@ rtl8366rb_port_disable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
>  	rb8366rb_set_port_led(smi, port, false);
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +rtl8366rb_port_bridge_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> +			   struct net_device *bridge)
> +{
> +	struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
> +	unsigned int port_bitmap = 0;
> +	int ret, i;
> +
> +	/* Loop over all other ports than this one */
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU; i++) {
> +		/* Handled last */
> +		if (i == port)
> +			continue;
> +		/* Not on this bridge */
> +		if (dsa_to_port(ds, i)->bridge_dev != bridge)
> +			continue;
> +		/* Join this port to each other port on the bridge */
> +		ret = regmap_update_bits(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(i),
> +					 BIT(port + 1), BIT(port + 1));
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		port_bitmap |= BIT(i);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Set the bits for the ports we can access */
> +	return regmap_update_bits(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(port),
> +				  RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK,
> +				  port_bitmap << 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +rtl8366rb_port_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> +			    struct net_device *bridge)
> +{
> +	struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
> +	unsigned int port_bitmap = 0;
> +	int ret, i;
> +
> +	/* Loop over all other ports than this one */
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU; i++) {
> +		/* Handled last */
> +		if (i == port)
> +			continue;
> +		/* Not on this bridge */
> +		if (dsa_to_port(ds, i)->bridge_dev != bridge)
> +			continue;
> +		/* Remove this port from any other port on the bridge */
> +		ret = regmap_update_bits(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(i),
> +					 BIT(port + 1), 0);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return;
> +
> +		port_bitmap |= BIT(i);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Clear the bits for the ports we can access */
> +	regmap_update_bits(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(port),
> +			   port_bitmap << 1, 0);
> +}
> +
>  static int rtl8366rb_change_mtu(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int new_mtu)
>  {
>  	struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
> @@ -1510,6 +1592,8 @@ static const struct dsa_switch_ops rtl8366rb_switch_ops = {
>  	.get_strings = rtl8366_get_strings,
>  	.get_ethtool_stats = rtl8366_get_ethtool_stats,
>  	.get_sset_count = rtl8366_get_sset_count,
> +	.port_bridge_join = rtl8366rb_port_bridge_join,
> +	.port_bridge_leave = rtl8366rb_port_bridge_leave,
>  	.port_vlan_filtering = rtl8366_vlan_filtering,
>  	.port_vlan_add = rtl8366_vlan_add,
>  	.port_vlan_del = rtl8366_vlan_del,
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

Looks okay for the most part. It is to be expected for a new driver that
introduces bridging offload to also handle .port_pre_bridge_flags,
.port_bridge_flags and .port_fast_age, for two reasons:
(a) it is expected that a port which does not offload the bridge, and
    performs forwarding in software, to not perform address learning in
    hardware
(b) it is expected that the addresses learned while the port was under a
    bridge are not carried over into its life as a standalone port, when
    it leaves that bridge

Also, it would be nice if you could do some minimal isolation at the
level of the FDB lookup. Currently, if I am not mistaken, a port will
perform FDB lookup even if it is standalone, and it might find an FDB
entry for a given {MAC DA, VLAN ID} pair that belongs to a port outside
of its isolation mask, so forwarding will be blocked and that packet
will be dropped (instead of the expected behavior which is for that
packet to be forwarded to the CPU).

Normally the expectation is that this FDB-level isolation can be achieved
by configuring the VLANs of one bridge to use a filter ID that is
different from the VLANs of another bridge, and the port-based default
VLAN of standalone ports to use yet another filter ID. This is yet
another reason to disable learning on standalone ports, so that their
filter ID never contains any FDB entry, and packets are always flooded
to their only possible destination, the CPU port.

Currently in DSA we do not offer a streamlined way for you to determine
what filter ID to use for a certain VLAN belonging to a certain bridge,
but at the very least you can test FDB isolation between standalone
ports and bridged ports. The simplest way to do that, assuming you
already have a forwarding setup with 2 switch ports swp0 and swp1, is to
enable CONFIG_BONDING=y, and then:

ip link add br0 type bridge
ip link set bond0 master br0
ip link set swp1 master bond0
ip link set swp0 master br0

Then ping between station A attached to swp0 and station B attached to
swp1.

Because swp1 cannot offload bond0, it will fall back to software
forwarding and act as standalone, i.e. what you had up till now.
With hardware address learning enabled on swp0 (a port that offloads
br0), it will learn station A's source MAC address. Then when swp1 needs
to send a packet to station A's destination MAC address, it would be
tempted to look up the FDB, find that address, and forward to swp0. But
swp0 is isolated from swp1. If you use a filter ID for standalone ports
and another filter ID for bridged ports you will avoid that problem, and
you will also lay the groundwork for the full FDB isolation even between
bridges that will be coming during the next development cycle.

If you feel that the second part is too much for now, you can just add
the extra callbacks for address learning and flushing (although I do
have some genuine concerns about how reliable was the software forwarding
with this driver, seeing that right now it enables hardware learning
unconditionally). Is there something that isolates FDB lookups already?
Linus Walleij Aug. 30, 2021, 9:22 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:12 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:

> > +/* Port isolation registers */
> > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_BASE              0x0F08
> > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(pnum)     (RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_BASE + (pnum))
> > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN                BIT(0)
> > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK        GENMASK(7, 1)
>
> If RTL8366RB_NUM_PORTS is 6, then why is RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK a
> 7-bit field?

It's a 6 bit field actually from bit 1 to bit 7 just shifted up one
bit because bit 0 is "enable".

> > +     /* Isolate all user ports so only the CPU port can access them */
> > +     for (i = 0; i < RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU; i++) {
> > +             ret = regmap_write(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(i),
> > +                                RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN |
> > +                                BIT(RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU + 1));
>
> The shifting due to RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN looks weird, I can see it
> being mishandled in the future, with code moved around, copied and
> pasted between realtek drivers and such. How about making a macro
>
> #define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS(x)     ((x) << 1)

OK

> > +     /* CPU port can access all ports */
>
> Except itself maybe? RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU is 5, so maybe use something
> like
>
> RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS(dsa_user_ports(ds))

Tested this and it appears to work just fine!

> Looks okay for the most part. It is to be expected for a new driver that
> introduces bridging offload to also handle .port_pre_bridge_flags,
> .port_bridge_flags and .port_fast_age, for two reasons:
> (a) it is expected that a port which does not offload the bridge, and
>     performs forwarding in software, to not perform address learning in
>     hardware
> (b) it is expected that the addresses learned while the port was under a
>     bridge are not carried over into its life as a standalone port, when
>     it leaves that bridge

I studied the vendor code drop and register file and implemented
the BR_LEARNING flag, and I also managed to implement fast aging.
Each as a separate patch. Thanks for pointing this out!

> Also, it would be nice if you could do some minimal isolation at the
> level of the FDB lookup. Currently, if I am not mistaken, a port will
> perform FDB lookup even if it is standalone, and it might find an FDB
> entry for a given {MAC DA, VLAN ID} pair that belongs to a port outside
> of its isolation mask, so forwarding will be blocked and that packet
> will be dropped (instead of the expected behavior which is for that
> packet to be forwarded to the CPU).
>
> Normally the expectation is that this FDB-level isolation can be achieved
> by configuring the VLANs of one bridge to use a filter ID that is
> different from the VLANs of another bridge, and the port-based default
> VLAN of standalone ports to use yet another filter ID. This is yet
> another reason to disable learning on standalone ports, so that their
> filter ID never contains any FDB entry, and packets are always flooded
> to their only possible destination, the CPU port.
>
> Currently in DSA we do not offer a streamlined way for you to determine
> what filter ID to use for a certain VLAN belonging to a certain bridge,
> but at the very least you can test FDB isolation between standalone
> ports and bridged ports. The simplest way to do that, assuming you
> already have a forwarding setup with 2 switch ports swp0 and swp1, is to
> enable CONFIG_BONDING=y, and then:
>
> ip link add br0 type bridge
> ip link set bond0 master br0
> ip link set swp1 master bond0
> ip link set swp0 master br0
>
> Then ping between station A attached to swp0 and station B attached to
> swp1.
>
> Because swp1 cannot offload bond0, it will fall back to software
> forwarding and act as standalone, i.e. what you had up till now.
> With hardware address learning enabled on swp0 (a port that offloads
> br0), it will learn station A's source MAC address. Then when swp1 needs
> to send a packet to station A's destination MAC address, it would be
> tempted to look up the FDB, find that address, and forward to swp0. But
> swp0 is isolated from swp1. If you use a filter ID for standalone ports
> and another filter ID for bridged ports you will avoid that problem, and
> you will also lay the groundwork for the full FDB isolation even between
> bridges that will be coming during the next development cycle.
>
> If you feel that the second part is too much for now, you can just add
> the extra callbacks for address learning and flushing (although I do
> have some genuine concerns about how reliable was the software forwarding
> with this driver, seeing that right now it enables hardware learning
> unconditionally). Is there something that isolates FDB lookups already?

Ugh that was massive, I'm not that smart ;)

I kinda understand it but have no idea how to achieve this with
the current hardware, driver and vendor code mess.

I prefer to fix the first part for now.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Vladimir Oltean Aug. 30, 2021, 10:01 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:22:11PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:12 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > +/* Port isolation registers */
> > > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_BASE              0x0F08
> > > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(pnum)     (RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_BASE + (pnum))
> > > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN                BIT(0)
> > > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK        GENMASK(7, 1)
> >
> > If RTL8366RB_NUM_PORTS is 6, then why is RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK a
> > 7-bit field?
> 
> It's a 6 bit field actually from bit 1 to bit 7 just shifted up one
> bit because bit 0 is "enable".

Understood the part about bit 0 being "ENABLE".
But from bit 1 to bit 7, I count 7 bits set....

> > Also, it would be nice if you could do some minimal isolation at the
> > level of the FDB lookup. Currently, if I am not mistaken, a port will
> > perform FDB lookup even if it is standalone, and it might find an FDB
> > entry for a given {MAC DA, VLAN ID} pair that belongs to a port outside
> > of its isolation mask, so forwarding will be blocked and that packet
> > will be dropped (instead of the expected behavior which is for that
> > packet to be forwarded to the CPU).
> >
> > Normally the expectation is that this FDB-level isolation can be achieved
> > by configuring the VLANs of one bridge to use a filter ID that is
> > different from the VLANs of another bridge, and the port-based default
> > VLAN of standalone ports to use yet another filter ID. This is yet
> > another reason to disable learning on standalone ports, so that their
> > filter ID never contains any FDB entry, and packets are always flooded
> > to their only possible destination, the CPU port.
> >
> > Currently in DSA we do not offer a streamlined way for you to determine
> > what filter ID to use for a certain VLAN belonging to a certain bridge,
> > but at the very least you can test FDB isolation between standalone
> > ports and bridged ports. The simplest way to do that, assuming you
> > already have a forwarding setup with 2 switch ports swp0 and swp1, is to
> > enable CONFIG_BONDING=y, and then:
> >
> > ip link add br0 type bridge
> > ip link set bond0 master br0
> > ip link set swp1 master bond0
> > ip link set swp0 master br0
> >
> > Then ping between station A attached to swp0 and station B attached to
> > swp1.
> >
> > Because swp1 cannot offload bond0, it will fall back to software
> > forwarding and act as standalone, i.e. what you had up till now.
> > With hardware address learning enabled on swp0 (a port that offloads
> > br0), it will learn station A's source MAC address. Then when swp1 needs
> > to send a packet to station A's destination MAC address, it would be
> > tempted to look up the FDB, find that address, and forward to swp0. But
> > swp0 is isolated from swp1. If you use a filter ID for standalone ports
> > and another filter ID for bridged ports you will avoid that problem, and
> > you will also lay the groundwork for the full FDB isolation even between
> > bridges that will be coming during the next development cycle.
> >
> > If you feel that the second part is too much for now, you can just add
> > the extra callbacks for address learning and flushing (although I do
> > have some genuine concerns about how reliable was the software forwarding
> > with this driver, seeing that right now it enables hardware learning
> > unconditionally). Is there something that isolates FDB lookups already?
> 
> Ugh that was massive, I'm not that smart ;)
> 
> I kinda understand it but have no idea how to achieve this with
> the current hardware, driver and vendor code mess.
> 
> I prefer to fix the first part for now.

Okay, no problem, I suppose FDB isolation can be revisited as part of
the larger rework I've got planned for the next kernel.
Linus Walleij Aug. 30, 2021, 10:06 p.m. UTC | #4 
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:01 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:22:11PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:12 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > +/* Port isolation registers */
> > > > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_BASE              0x0F08
> > > > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(pnum)     (RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_BASE + (pnum))
> > > > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN                BIT(0)
> > > > +#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK        GENMASK(7, 1)
> > >
> > > If RTL8366RB_NUM_PORTS is 6, then why is RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK a
> > > 7-bit field?
> >
> > It's a 6 bit field actually from bit 1 to bit 7 just shifted up one
> > bit because bit 0 is "enable".
>
> Understood the part about bit 0 being "ENABLE".
> But from bit 1 to bit 7, I count 7 bits set....

Oh yeah.... something is wrong with my arithmetics.

Bit 0: enable
Bit 1: port 0
Bit 2: port 1
Bit 3: port 2
Bit 4: port 3
Bit 5: port 4
Bit 6: port 5 - CPU

I'll fix with the rest of the comments for v3.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
index a89093bc6c6a..14939188c108 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
@@ -300,6 +300,12 @@ 
 #define RTL8366RB_INTERRUPT_STATUS_REG	0x0442
 #define RTL8366RB_NUM_INTERRUPT		14 /* 0..13 */
 
+/* Port isolation registers */
+#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_BASE		0x0F08
+#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(pnum)	(RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_BASE + (pnum))
+#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN		BIT(0)
+#define RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK	GENMASK(7, 1)
+
 /* bits 0..5 enable force when cleared */
 #define RTL8366RB_MAC_FORCE_CTRL_REG	0x0F11
 
@@ -835,6 +841,21 @@  static int rtl8366rb_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	/* Isolate all user ports so only the CPU port can access them */
+	for (i = 0; i < RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU; i++) {
+		ret = regmap_write(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(i),
+				   RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN |
+				   BIT(RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU + 1));
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+	/* CPU port can access all ports */
+	ret = regmap_write(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU),
+			   RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK |
+			   RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_EN);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	/* Set up the "green ethernet" feature */
 	ret = rtl8366rb_jam_table(rtl8366rb_green_jam,
 				  ARRAY_SIZE(rtl8366rb_green_jam), smi, false);
@@ -1127,6 +1148,67 @@  rtl8366rb_port_disable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
 	rb8366rb_set_port_led(smi, port, false);
 }
 
+static int
+rtl8366rb_port_bridge_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
+			   struct net_device *bridge)
+{
+	struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
+	unsigned int port_bitmap = 0;
+	int ret, i;
+
+	/* Loop over all other ports than this one */
+	for (i = 0; i < RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU; i++) {
+		/* Handled last */
+		if (i == port)
+			continue;
+		/* Not on this bridge */
+		if (dsa_to_port(ds, i)->bridge_dev != bridge)
+			continue;
+		/* Join this port to each other port on the bridge */
+		ret = regmap_update_bits(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(i),
+					 BIT(port + 1), BIT(port + 1));
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		port_bitmap |= BIT(i);
+	}
+
+	/* Set the bits for the ports we can access */
+	return regmap_update_bits(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(port),
+				  RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO_PORTS_MASK,
+				  port_bitmap << 1);
+}
+
+static void
+rtl8366rb_port_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
+			    struct net_device *bridge)
+{
+	struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
+	unsigned int port_bitmap = 0;
+	int ret, i;
+
+	/* Loop over all other ports than this one */
+	for (i = 0; i < RTL8366RB_PORT_NUM_CPU; i++) {
+		/* Handled last */
+		if (i == port)
+			continue;
+		/* Not on this bridge */
+		if (dsa_to_port(ds, i)->bridge_dev != bridge)
+			continue;
+		/* Remove this port from any other port on the bridge */
+		ret = regmap_update_bits(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(i),
+					 BIT(port + 1), 0);
+		if (ret)
+			return;
+
+		port_bitmap |= BIT(i);
+	}
+
+	/* Clear the bits for the ports we can access */
+	regmap_update_bits(smi->map, RTL8366RB_PORT_ISO(port),
+			   port_bitmap << 1, 0);
+}
+
 static int rtl8366rb_change_mtu(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int new_mtu)
 {
 	struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
@@ -1510,6 +1592,8 @@  static const struct dsa_switch_ops rtl8366rb_switch_ops = {
 	.get_strings = rtl8366_get_strings,
 	.get_ethtool_stats = rtl8366_get_ethtool_stats,
 	.get_sset_count = rtl8366_get_sset_count,
+	.port_bridge_join = rtl8366rb_port_bridge_join,
+	.port_bridge_leave = rtl8366rb_port_bridge_leave,
 	.port_vlan_filtering = rtl8366_vlan_filtering,
 	.port_vlan_add = rtl8366_vlan_add,
 	.port_vlan_del = rtl8366_vlan_del,