| Message ID | 20210824122016.144364-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | hw/arm/virt: Introduce cpu topology support | expand |
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 13:20, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote: > > This new version is based on patch series [1] which introduces some > fix and improvement for smp parsing. > > Description: > Once the view of an accurate virtual cpu topology is provided to guest, > with a well-designed vCPU pinning to the pCPU we may get a huge benefit, > e.g., the scheduling performance improvement. See Dario Faggioli's > research and the related performance tests in [2] for reference. > > This patch series introduces cpu topology support for ARM platform. > Both cpu-map in DT and ACPI PPTT table are introduced to store the > topology information. And we only describe the topology information > to 6.2 and newer virt machines, considering compatibility. > > patches not yet reviewed: #1 and #3. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210823122804.7692-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ > [2] https://kvmforum2020.sched.com/event/eE1y/virtual-topology-for-virtual-machines > -friend-or-foe-dario-faggioli-suse Hi; this series doesn't apply to current head-of-git. Is it intended to be based on some other series ? thanks -- PMM
On 2021/9/2 23:56, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 13:20, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote: >> This new version is based on patch series [1] which introduces some >> fix and improvement for smp parsing. >> >> Description: >> Once the view of an accurate virtual cpu topology is provided to guest, >> with a well-designed vCPU pinning to the pCPU we may get a huge benefit, >> e.g., the scheduling performance improvement. See Dario Faggioli's >> research and the related performance tests in [2] for reference. >> >> This patch series introduces cpu topology support for ARM platform. >> Both cpu-map in DT and ACPI PPTT table are introduced to store the >> topology information. And we only describe the topology information >> to 6.2 and newer virt machines, considering compatibility. >> >> patches not yet reviewed: #1 and #3. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210823122804.7692-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ >> [2] https://kvmforum2020.sched.com/event/eE1y/virtual-topology-for-virtual-machines >> -friend-or-foe-dario-faggioli-suse > > Hi; this series doesn't apply to current head-of-git. Is it > intended to be based on some other series ? > Yes, it was based on the -smp parsing changes in [1] which hasn't been picked yet. Given that [1] somehow affects the topology parsing results which we will describe to guest, I think it may be better that [1] can be merged first and then this series follows. But actually the only conflict with current upstream is in patch#1 about machine type compat, so I can also send a new version of this series rebased on the latest upstream with minor update, if the precedence consideration of the two series is not so necessary as I thought. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210902110330.18036-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ Thanks, Yanan .
On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 08:05, wangyanan (Y) <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote: > > > On 2021/9/2 23:56, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 13:20, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote: > >> This new version is based on patch series [1] which introduces some > >> fix and improvement for smp parsing. > >> > >> Description: > >> Once the view of an accurate virtual cpu topology is provided to guest, > >> with a well-designed vCPU pinning to the pCPU we may get a huge benefit, > >> e.g., the scheduling performance improvement. See Dario Faggioli's > >> research and the related performance tests in [2] for reference. > >> > >> This patch series introduces cpu topology support for ARM platform. > >> Both cpu-map in DT and ACPI PPTT table are introduced to store the > >> topology information. And we only describe the topology information > >> to 6.2 and newer virt machines, considering compatibility. > >> > >> patches not yet reviewed: #1 and #3. > >> > >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210823122804.7692-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ > >> [2] https://kvmforum2020.sched.com/event/eE1y/virtual-topology-for-virtual-machines > >> -friend-or-foe-dario-faggioli-suse > > > > Hi; this series doesn't apply to current head-of-git. Is it > > intended to be based on some other series ? > > > Yes, it was based on the -smp parsing changes in [1] which hasn't been > picked yet. Given that [1] somehow affects the topology parsing results > which we will describe to guest, I think it may be better that [1] can be > merged first and then this series follows. OK. I'll ignore this for now; please resend once that other series has been accepted. thanks -- PMM
On 2021/9/3 15:25, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 08:05, wangyanan (Y) <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote: >> >> On 2021/9/2 23:56, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 13:20, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote: >>>> This new version is based on patch series [1] which introduces some >>>> fix and improvement for smp parsing. >>>> >>>> Description: >>>> Once the view of an accurate virtual cpu topology is provided to guest, >>>> with a well-designed vCPU pinning to the pCPU we may get a huge benefit, >>>> e.g., the scheduling performance improvement. See Dario Faggioli's >>>> research and the related performance tests in [2] for reference. >>>> >>>> This patch series introduces cpu topology support for ARM platform. >>>> Both cpu-map in DT and ACPI PPTT table are introduced to store the >>>> topology information. And we only describe the topology information >>>> to 6.2 and newer virt machines, considering compatibility. >>>> >>>> patches not yet reviewed: #1 and #3. >>>> >>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210823122804.7692-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ >>>> [2] https://kvmforum2020.sched.com/event/eE1y/virtual-topology-for-virtual-machines >>>> -friend-or-foe-dario-faggioli-suse >>> Hi; this series doesn't apply to current head-of-git. Is it >>> intended to be based on some other series ? >>> >> Yes, it was based on the -smp parsing changes in [1] which hasn't been >> picked yet. Given that [1] somehow affects the topology parsing results >> which we will describe to guest, I think it may be better that [1] can be >> merged first and then this series follows. > OK. I'll ignore this for now; please resend once that other series > has been accepted. Got it. Thanks, Yanan > thanks > -- PMM > > .
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 03:38:13PM +0800, wangyanan (Y) wrote: > > On 2021/9/3 15:25, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 08:05, wangyanan (Y) <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 2021/9/2 23:56, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 13:20, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > This new version is based on patch series [1] which introduces some > > > > > fix and improvement for smp parsing. > > > > > > > > > > Description: > > > > > Once the view of an accurate virtual cpu topology is provided to guest, > > > > > with a well-designed vCPU pinning to the pCPU we may get a huge benefit, > > > > > e.g., the scheduling performance improvement. See Dario Faggioli's > > > > > research and the related performance tests in [2] for reference. > > > > > > > > > > This patch series introduces cpu topology support for ARM platform. > > > > > Both cpu-map in DT and ACPI PPTT table are introduced to store the > > > > > topology information. And we only describe the topology information > > > > > to 6.2 and newer virt machines, considering compatibility. > > > > > > > > > > patches not yet reviewed: #1 and #3. > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210823122804.7692-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ > > > > > [2] https://kvmforum2020.sched.com/event/eE1y/virtual-topology-for-virtual-machines > > > > > -friend-or-foe-dario-faggioli-suse > > > > Hi; this series doesn't apply to current head-of-git. Is it > > > > intended to be based on some other series ? > > > > > > > Yes, it was based on the -smp parsing changes in [1] which hasn't been > > > picked yet. Given that [1] somehow affects the topology parsing results > > > which we will describe to guest, I think it may be better that [1] can be > > > merged first and then this series follows. > > OK. I'll ignore this for now; please resend once that other series > > has been accepted. > Got it. Also, you'll likely want to rebase on Igor's acpi refactor series[*] [*] https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg822151.html Thanks, drew > > Thanks, > Yanan > > thanks > > -- PMM > > > > . >
On 2021/9/7 0:15, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 03:38:13PM +0800, wangyanan (Y) wrote: >> On 2021/9/3 15:25, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 08:05, wangyanan (Y) <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote: >>>> On 2021/9/2 23:56, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 13:20, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote: >>>>>> This new version is based on patch series [1] which introduces some >>>>>> fix and improvement for smp parsing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Description: >>>>>> Once the view of an accurate virtual cpu topology is provided to guest, >>>>>> with a well-designed vCPU pinning to the pCPU we may get a huge benefit, >>>>>> e.g., the scheduling performance improvement. See Dario Faggioli's >>>>>> research and the related performance tests in [2] for reference. >>>>>> >>>>>> This patch series introduces cpu topology support for ARM platform. >>>>>> Both cpu-map in DT and ACPI PPTT table are introduced to store the >>>>>> topology information. And we only describe the topology information >>>>>> to 6.2 and newer virt machines, considering compatibility. >>>>>> >>>>>> patches not yet reviewed: #1 and #3. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210823122804.7692-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ >>>>>> [2] https://kvmforum2020.sched.com/event/eE1y/virtual-topology-for-virtual-machines >>>>>> -friend-or-foe-dario-faggioli-suse >>>>> Hi; this series doesn't apply to current head-of-git. Is it >>>>> intended to be based on some other series ? >>>>> >>>> Yes, it was based on the -smp parsing changes in [1] which hasn't been >>>> picked yet. Given that [1] somehow affects the topology parsing results >>>> which we will describe to guest, I think it may be better that [1] can be >>>> merged first and then this series follows. >>> OK. I'll ignore this for now; please resend once that other series >>> has been accepted. >> Got it. > Also, you'll likely want to rebase on Igor's acpi refactor series[*] > > [*] https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg822151.html > Ok, sure. I can wait for a while and will rebase the ACPI changes on Igor's series for next version. Thanks, Yanan