| Message ID | 20210920192110.221153-1-Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/2] Enable buddy memory manager support | expand |
Am 20.09.21 um 21:21 schrieb Arunpravin: > Replace drm_mm with drm buddy manager for > VRAM memory management > > Signed-off-by: Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com> > --- > .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h | 78 +++++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 3 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c | 216 ++++++++++-------- > 3 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h > index acfa207cf970..ba24052e9062 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h > @@ -30,12 +30,25 @@ > #include <drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h> > #include <drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.h> > > +struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node { > + struct ttm_range_mgr_node tnode; NAK, don't base this on ttm_range_mgr_node. Instead use ttm_resource. And please name the member base instead. > + struct list_head blocks; > +}; > + > +static inline struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node * > +to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(struct ttm_resource *res) > +{ > + return container_of(container_of(res, struct ttm_range_mgr_node, base), > + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node, tnode); > +} > + Maybe stuff that in a separate amdgpu_vram_mgr.h file together with all the other defines for the vram manager. > /* state back for walking over vram_mgr and gtt_mgr allocations */ > struct amdgpu_res_cursor { > uint64_t start; > uint64_t size; > uint64_t remaining; > - struct drm_mm_node *node; > + void *node; > + uint32_t mem_type; > }; > > /** > @@ -52,8 +65,6 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_first(struct ttm_resource *res, > uint64_t start, uint64_t size, > struct amdgpu_res_cursor *cur) > { > - struct drm_mm_node *node; > - > if (!res || res->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM) { > cur->start = start; > cur->size = size; > @@ -65,14 +76,39 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_first(struct ttm_resource *res, > > BUG_ON(start + size > res->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT); > > - node = to_ttm_range_mgr_node(res)->mm_nodes; > - while (start >= node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) > - start -= node++->size << PAGE_SHIFT; > + cur->mem_type = res->mem_type; > + > + if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) { Rather use a switch/case here. > + struct drm_buddy_block *block; > + struct list_head *head, *next; > + > + head = &to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(res)->blocks; > + > + block = list_first_entry_or_null(head, struct drm_buddy_block, link); > + while (start >= block->size << PAGE_SHIFT) { > + start -= block->size << PAGE_SHIFT; > + > + next = block->link.next; > + if (next != head) > + block = list_entry(next, struct drm_buddy_block, link); > + } > > - cur->start = (node->start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start; > - cur->size = min((node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) - start, size); > - cur->remaining = size; > - cur->node = node; > + cur->start = (block->start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start; > + cur->size = min((block->size << PAGE_SHIFT) - start, size); > + cur->remaining = size; > + cur->node = block; > + } else if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) { > + struct drm_mm_node *node; > + > + node = to_ttm_range_mgr_node(res)->mm_nodes; > + while (start >= node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) > + start -= node++->size << PAGE_SHIFT; > + > + cur->start = (node->start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start; > + cur->size = min((node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) - start, size); > + cur->remaining = size; > + cur->node = node; With a default handling for other placement types. > + } > } > > /** > @@ -85,8 +121,6 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_first(struct ttm_resource *res, > */ > static inline void amdgpu_res_next(struct amdgpu_res_cursor *cur, uint64_t size) > { > - struct drm_mm_node *node = cur->node; > - > BUG_ON(size > cur->remaining); > > cur->remaining -= size; > @@ -99,9 +133,23 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_next(struct amdgpu_res_cursor *cur, uint64_t size) > return; > } > > - cur->node = ++node; > - cur->start = node->start << PAGE_SHIFT; > - cur->size = min(node->size << PAGE_SHIFT, cur->remaining); > + if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) { > + struct drm_buddy_block *block = cur->node; > + struct list_head *next; > + > + next = block->link.next; > + block = list_entry(next, struct drm_buddy_block, link); > + > + cur->node = block; > + cur->start = block->start << PAGE_SHIFT; > + cur->size = min(block->size << PAGE_SHIFT, cur->remaining); > + } else if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) { > + struct drm_mm_node *node = cur->node; > + > + cur->node = ++node; > + cur->start = node->start << PAGE_SHIFT; > + cur->size = min(node->size << PAGE_SHIFT, cur->remaining); > + } > } > > #endif > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h > index e69f3e8e06e5..96c8e8aaa0ee 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > > #include <linux/dma-direction.h> > #include <drm/gpu_scheduler.h> > +#include <drm/drm_buddy.h> > #include "amdgpu.h" > > #define AMDGPU_PL_GDS (TTM_PL_PRIV + 0) > @@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ > > struct amdgpu_vram_mgr { > struct ttm_resource_manager manager; > - struct drm_mm mm; > + struct drm_buddy_mm mm; > spinlock_t lock; > struct list_head reservations_pending; > struct list_head reserved_pages; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c > index 7b2b0980ec41..de0c5f4cabaf 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c > @@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/dma-mapping.h> > +#include <linux/list_sort.h> > #include <drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.h> > +#include <drm/drm_buddy.h> > > #include "amdgpu.h" > #include "amdgpu_vm.h" > @@ -33,7 +35,7 @@ > > struct amdgpu_vram_reservation { > struct list_head node; > - struct drm_mm_node mm_node; > + struct drm_buddy_block mm_node; > }; > > static inline struct amdgpu_vram_mgr * > @@ -196,10 +198,10 @@ const struct attribute_group amdgpu_vram_mgr_attr_group = { > * Calculate how many bytes of the MM node are inside visible VRAM > */ > static u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > - struct drm_mm_node *node) > + struct drm_buddy_block *block) > { > - uint64_t start = node->start << PAGE_SHIFT; > - uint64_t end = (node->size + node->start) << PAGE_SHIFT; > + uint64_t start = block->start << PAGE_SHIFT; > + uint64_t end = (block->size + block->start) << PAGE_SHIFT; > > if (start >= adev->gmc.visible_vram_size) > return 0; > @@ -220,8 +222,8 @@ u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_bo_visible_size(struct amdgpu_bo *bo) > { > struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev); > struct ttm_resource *res = bo->tbo.resource; > - unsigned pages = res->num_pages; > - struct drm_mm_node *mm; > + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node *vnode = to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(res); > + struct drm_buddy_block *block; > u64 usage; > > if (amdgpu_gmc_vram_full_visible(&adev->gmc)) > @@ -230,9 +232,8 @@ u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_bo_visible_size(struct amdgpu_bo *bo) > if (res->start >= adev->gmc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > return 0; > > - mm = &container_of(res, struct ttm_range_mgr_node, base)->mm_nodes[0]; > - for (usage = 0; pages; pages -= mm->size, mm++) > - usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, mm); > + list_for_each_entry(block, &vnode->blocks, link) > + usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, block); > > return usage; > } > @@ -242,12 +243,15 @@ static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_do_reserve(struct ttm_resource_manager *man) > { > struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); > struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(mgr); > - struct drm_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; > + struct drm_buddy_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; > struct amdgpu_vram_reservation *rsv, *temp; > uint64_t vis_usage; > + int r = 0; > > list_for_each_entry_safe(rsv, temp, &mgr->reservations_pending, node) { > - if (drm_mm_reserve_node(mm, &rsv->mm_node)) > + r = drm_buddy_alloc_range(mm, &rsv->node, rsv->mm_node.start, rsv->mm_node.size); > + > + if (unlikely(r)) > continue; > > dev_dbg(adev->dev, "Reservation 0x%llx - %lld, Succeeded\n", > @@ -333,26 +337,16 @@ int amdgpu_vram_mgr_query_page_status(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > return ret; > } > > -/** > - * amdgpu_vram_mgr_virt_start - update virtual start address > - * > - * @mem: ttm_resource to update > - * @node: just allocated node > - * > - * Calculate a virtual BO start address to easily check if everything is CPU > - * accessible. > - */ > -static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_virt_start(struct ttm_resource *mem, > - struct drm_mm_node *node) > +static int sort_blocks(void *priv, const struct list_head *A, > + const struct list_head *B) Please prefix all function with amdgpu_vram_mgr_. > { > - unsigned long start; > + struct drm_buddy_block *a = list_entry(A, typeof(*a), link); > + struct drm_buddy_block *b = list_entry(B, typeof(*b), link); > > - start = node->start + node->size; > - if (start > mem->num_pages) > - start -= mem->num_pages; > + if (a->start < b->start) > + return -1; > else > - start = 0; > - mem->start = max(mem->start, start); > + return 1; > } > > /** > @@ -370,15 +364,20 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > const struct ttm_place *place, > struct ttm_resource **res) > { > - unsigned long lpfn, num_nodes, pages_per_node, pages_left, pages; > + unsigned long lpfn, pages_per_node, pages_left, pages; > struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); > struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(mgr); > uint64_t vis_usage = 0, mem_bytes, max_bytes; > + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node *vnode; > + struct drm_buddy_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; > struct ttm_range_mgr_node *node; > - struct drm_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; > - enum drm_mm_insert_mode mode; > + enum drm_buddy_alloc_mode mode; > + struct drm_buddy_block *block; > + unsigned int visible_pfn; > + bool bar_limit_enabled; > + unsigned long n_pages; > unsigned i; > - int r; > + int r = 0; Please don't initialize the return type here. That's considered bad coding style. > > lpfn = place->lpfn; > if (!lpfn) > @@ -395,10 +394,9 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > goto error_sub; > } > > - if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) { > + if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) > pages_per_node = ~0ul; > - num_nodes = 1; > - } else { > + else { > #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE > pages_per_node = HPAGE_PMD_NR; > #else > @@ -407,57 +405,97 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > #endif > pages_per_node = max_t(uint32_t, pages_per_node, > tbo->page_alignment); > - num_nodes = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(PFN_UP(mem_bytes), pages_per_node); > } > > - node = kvmalloc(struct_size(node, mm_nodes, num_nodes), > - GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO); > - if (!node) { > + vnode = kzalloc(sizeof(*vnode), GFP_KERNEL); > + > + if (!vnode) { > r = -ENOMEM; > goto error_sub; > } > > + node = &vnode->tnode; > + > ttm_resource_init(tbo, place, &node->base); > > - mode = DRM_MM_INSERT_BEST; > - if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN) > - mode = DRM_MM_INSERT_HIGH; > + bar_limit_enabled = !(amdgpu_gmc_vram_full_visible(&adev->gmc)); > + > + visible_pfn = adev->gmc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT; > + > + mode = DRM_BUDDY_BOTTOM_UP; > + if (!place->fpfn && lpfn == man->size && > + (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN)) > + /* Allocate blocks from CPU non-mappable (TOP-DOWN) region */ > + mode = DRM_BUDDY_TOP_DOWN; > + else if (place->fpfn || (lpfn != man->size && lpfn != visible_pfn)) > + /* Allocate blocks in desired range */ > + mode = DRM_BUDDY_ALLOC_RANGE; > > pages_left = node->base.num_pages; > > /* Limit maximum size to 2GB due to SG table limitations */ > pages = min(pages_left, 2UL << (30 - PAGE_SHIFT)); > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vnode->blocks); > + > i = 0; > - spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > - while (pages_left) { > - uint32_t alignment = tbo->page_alignment; > - > - if (pages >= pages_per_node) > - alignment = pages_per_node; > - > - r = drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(mm, &node->mm_nodes[i], pages, > - alignment, 0, place->fpfn, > - lpfn, mode); > - if (unlikely(r)) { > - if (pages > pages_per_node) { > - if (is_power_of_2(pages)) > - pages = pages / 2; > - else > - pages = rounddown_pow_of_two(pages); > - continue; > - } > - goto error_free; > - } > + if (mode == DRM_BUDDY_ALLOC_RANGE) { > + r = drm_buddy_alloc_range(mm, &vnode->blocks, > + (uint64_t)place->fpfn << PAGE_SHIFT, pages << PAGE_SHIFT); That handling won't work. It's possible that you need contiguous memory in a specific range. > + > + if (unlikely(r)) > + goto error_free_res; > + } else { > + while (pages_left) { > + if (pages >= pages_per_node) > + pages = pages_per_node; > + > + n_pages = pages; > + > + if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) > + n_pages = roundup_pow_of_two(n_pages); That approach won't work either. For contiguous allocation you need to allocate one big chunk and then free up what you don't need at the end. > + > + do { > + unsigned int order; > + > + order = fls(n_pages) - 1; > + BUG_ON(order > mm->max_order); > + > + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > + block = drm_buddy_alloc(mm, order, bar_limit_enabled, > + visible_pfn, mode); That doesn't seem to make much sense either. The backend allocator should not care about the BAR size nor the visible_pfn. > + spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > > - vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, &node->mm_nodes[i]); > - amdgpu_vram_mgr_virt_start(&node->base, &node->mm_nodes[i]); > - pages_left -= pages; > - ++i; > + if (IS_ERR(block)) { > + r = -ENOSPC; > + goto error_free_blocks; > + } > > - if (pages > pages_left) > - pages = pages_left; > + n_pages -= BIT(order); > + > + list_add_tail(&block->link, &vnode->blocks); > + > + if (!n_pages) > + break; > + } while (1); > + > + pages_left -= pages; > + ++i; > + > + if (pages > pages_left) > + pages = pages_left; > + } > } > + > + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > + list_sort(NULL, &vnode->blocks, sort_blocks); Why do you sort the list here? Regards, Christian. > + > + list_for_each_entry(block, &vnode->blocks, link) > + vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, block); > + > + block = list_first_entry_or_null(&vnode->blocks, > + struct drm_buddy_block, link); > + node->base.start = block->start; > spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > > if (i == 1) > @@ -472,12 +510,12 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > *res = &node->base; > return 0; > > -error_free: > - while (i--) > - drm_mm_remove_node(&node->mm_nodes[i]); > +error_free_blocks: > + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > + drm_buddy_free_list(mm, &vnode->blocks); > spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > - kvfree(node); > - > +error_free_res: > + kfree(vnode); > error_sub: > atomic64_sub(mem_bytes, &mgr->usage); > return r; > @@ -494,28 +532,28 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_del(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > struct ttm_resource *res) > { > - struct ttm_range_mgr_node *node = to_ttm_range_mgr_node(res); > + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node *vnode = to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(res); > struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); > struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(mgr); > + struct drm_buddy_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; > + struct drm_buddy_block *block; > uint64_t usage = 0, vis_usage = 0; > - unsigned i, pages; > > spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > - for (i = 0, pages = res->num_pages; pages; > - pages -= node->mm_nodes[i].size, ++i) { > - struct drm_mm_node *mm = &node->mm_nodes[i]; > - > - drm_mm_remove_node(mm); > - usage += mm->size << PAGE_SHIFT; > - vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, mm); > + list_for_each_entry(block, &vnode->blocks, link) { > + usage += block->size << PAGE_SHIFT; > + vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, block); > } > + > amdgpu_vram_mgr_do_reserve(man); > + > + drm_buddy_free_list(mm, &vnode->blocks); > spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > > atomic64_sub(usage, &mgr->usage); > atomic64_sub(vis_usage, &mgr->vis_usage); > > - kvfree(node); > + kfree(vnode); > } > > /** > @@ -668,12 +706,6 @@ uint64_t amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_usage(struct ttm_resource_manager *man) > static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_debug(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > struct drm_printer *printer) > { > - struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); > - > - spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > - drm_mm_print(&mgr->mm, printer); > - spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > - > drm_printf(printer, "man size:%llu pages, ram usage:%lluMB, vis usage:%lluMB\n", > man->size, amdgpu_vram_mgr_usage(man) >> 20, > amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_usage(man) >> 20); > @@ -701,7 +733,7 @@ int amdgpu_vram_mgr_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > > man->func = &amdgpu_vram_mgr_func; > > - drm_mm_init(&mgr->mm, 0, man->size); > + drm_buddy_init(&mgr->mm, man->size << PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE); > spin_lock_init(&mgr->lock); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->reservations_pending); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->reserved_pages); > @@ -737,10 +769,10 @@ void amdgpu_vram_mgr_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > kfree(rsv); > > list_for_each_entry_safe(rsv, temp, &mgr->reserved_pages, node) { > - drm_mm_remove_node(&rsv->mm_node); > + drm_buddy_free(&mgr->mm, &rsv->mm_node); > kfree(rsv); > } > - drm_mm_takedown(&mgr->mm); > + drm_buddy_fini(&mgr->mm); > spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > > ttm_resource_manager_cleanup(man);
[AMD Public Use] Hi Christian, Please find my comments. Thanks, Arun -----Original Message----- From: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@amd.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 2:34 PM To: Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; matthew.auld@intel.com; daniel@ffwll.ch; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add drm buddy manager support to amdgpu driver Am 20.09.21 um 21:21 schrieb Arunpravin: > Replace drm_mm with drm buddy manager for VRAM memory management > > Signed-off-by: Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com> > --- > .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h | 78 +++++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 3 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c | 216 ++++++++++-------- > 3 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h > index acfa207cf970..ba24052e9062 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h > @@ -30,12 +30,25 @@ > #include <drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h> > #include <drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.h> > > +struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node { > + struct ttm_range_mgr_node tnode; NAK, don't base this on ttm_range_mgr_node. Instead use ttm_resource. And please name the member base instead. Arun - ok > + struct list_head blocks; > +}; > + > +static inline struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node * > +to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(struct ttm_resource *res) { > + return container_of(container_of(res, struct ttm_range_mgr_node, base), > + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node, tnode); } > + Maybe stuff that in a separate amdgpu_vram_mgr.h file together with all the other defines for the vram manager. Arun - I thought about it, will create a new header file for vram manager > /* state back for walking over vram_mgr and gtt_mgr allocations */ > struct amdgpu_res_cursor { > uint64_t start; > uint64_t size; > uint64_t remaining; > - struct drm_mm_node *node; > + void *node; > + uint32_t mem_type; > }; > > /** > @@ -52,8 +65,6 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_first(struct ttm_resource *res, > uint64_t start, uint64_t size, > struct amdgpu_res_cursor *cur) > { > - struct drm_mm_node *node; > - > if (!res || res->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM) { > cur->start = start; > cur->size = size; > @@ -65,14 +76,39 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_first(struct > ttm_resource *res, > > BUG_ON(start + size > res->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT); > > - node = to_ttm_range_mgr_node(res)->mm_nodes; > - while (start >= node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) > - start -= node++->size << PAGE_SHIFT; > + cur->mem_type = res->mem_type; > + > + if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) { Rather use a switch/case here. Arun - ok > + struct drm_buddy_block *block; > + struct list_head *head, *next; > + > + head = &to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(res)->blocks; > + > + block = list_first_entry_or_null(head, struct drm_buddy_block, link); > + while (start >= block->size << PAGE_SHIFT) { > + start -= block->size << PAGE_SHIFT; > + > + next = block->link.next; > + if (next != head) > + block = list_entry(next, struct drm_buddy_block, link); > + } > > - cur->start = (node->start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start; > - cur->size = min((node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) - start, size); > - cur->remaining = size; > - cur->node = node; > + cur->start = (block->start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start; > + cur->size = min((block->size << PAGE_SHIFT) - start, size); > + cur->remaining = size; > + cur->node = block; > + } else if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) { > + struct drm_mm_node *node; > + > + node = to_ttm_range_mgr_node(res)->mm_nodes; > + while (start >= node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) > + start -= node++->size << PAGE_SHIFT; > + > + cur->start = (node->start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start; > + cur->size = min((node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) - start, size); > + cur->remaining = size; > + cur->node = node; With a default handling for other placement types. Arun - ok > + } > } > > /** > @@ -85,8 +121,6 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_first(struct ttm_resource *res, > */ > static inline void amdgpu_res_next(struct amdgpu_res_cursor *cur, uint64_t size) > { > - struct drm_mm_node *node = cur->node; > - > BUG_ON(size > cur->remaining); > > cur->remaining -= size; > @@ -99,9 +133,23 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_next(struct amdgpu_res_cursor *cur, uint64_t size) > return; > } > > - cur->node = ++node; > - cur->start = node->start << PAGE_SHIFT; > - cur->size = min(node->size << PAGE_SHIFT, cur->remaining); > + if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) { > + struct drm_buddy_block *block = cur->node; > + struct list_head *next; > + > + next = block->link.next; > + block = list_entry(next, struct drm_buddy_block, link); > + > + cur->node = block; > + cur->start = block->start << PAGE_SHIFT; > + cur->size = min(block->size << PAGE_SHIFT, cur->remaining); > + } else if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) { > + struct drm_mm_node *node = cur->node; > + > + cur->node = ++node; > + cur->start = node->start << PAGE_SHIFT; > + cur->size = min(node->size << PAGE_SHIFT, cur->remaining); > + } > } > > #endif > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h > index e69f3e8e06e5..96c8e8aaa0ee 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > > #include <linux/dma-direction.h> > #include <drm/gpu_scheduler.h> > +#include <drm/drm_buddy.h> > #include "amdgpu.h" > > #define AMDGPU_PL_GDS (TTM_PL_PRIV + 0) > @@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ > > struct amdgpu_vram_mgr { > struct ttm_resource_manager manager; > - struct drm_mm mm; > + struct drm_buddy_mm mm; > spinlock_t lock; > struct list_head reservations_pending; > struct list_head reserved_pages; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c > index 7b2b0980ec41..de0c5f4cabaf 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c > @@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/dma-mapping.h> > +#include <linux/list_sort.h> > #include <drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.h> > +#include <drm/drm_buddy.h> > > #include "amdgpu.h" > #include "amdgpu_vm.h" > @@ -33,7 +35,7 @@ > > struct amdgpu_vram_reservation { > struct list_head node; > - struct drm_mm_node mm_node; > + struct drm_buddy_block mm_node; > }; > > static inline struct amdgpu_vram_mgr * @@ -196,10 +198,10 @@ const > struct attribute_group amdgpu_vram_mgr_attr_group = { > * Calculate how many bytes of the MM node are inside visible VRAM > */ > static u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > - struct drm_mm_node *node) > + struct drm_buddy_block *block) > { > - uint64_t start = node->start << PAGE_SHIFT; > - uint64_t end = (node->size + node->start) << PAGE_SHIFT; > + uint64_t start = block->start << PAGE_SHIFT; > + uint64_t end = (block->size + block->start) << PAGE_SHIFT; > > if (start >= adev->gmc.visible_vram_size) > return 0; > @@ -220,8 +222,8 @@ u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_bo_visible_size(struct amdgpu_bo *bo) > { > struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev); > struct ttm_resource *res = bo->tbo.resource; > - unsigned pages = res->num_pages; > - struct drm_mm_node *mm; > + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node *vnode = to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(res); > + struct drm_buddy_block *block; > u64 usage; > > if (amdgpu_gmc_vram_full_visible(&adev->gmc)) > @@ -230,9 +232,8 @@ u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_bo_visible_size(struct amdgpu_bo *bo) > if (res->start >= adev->gmc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > return 0; > > - mm = &container_of(res, struct ttm_range_mgr_node, base)->mm_nodes[0]; > - for (usage = 0; pages; pages -= mm->size, mm++) > - usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, mm); > + list_for_each_entry(block, &vnode->blocks, link) > + usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, block); > > return usage; > } > @@ -242,12 +243,15 @@ static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_do_reserve(struct ttm_resource_manager *man) > { > struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); > struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(mgr); > - struct drm_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; > + struct drm_buddy_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; > struct amdgpu_vram_reservation *rsv, *temp; > uint64_t vis_usage; > + int r = 0; > > list_for_each_entry_safe(rsv, temp, &mgr->reservations_pending, node) { > - if (drm_mm_reserve_node(mm, &rsv->mm_node)) > + r = drm_buddy_alloc_range(mm, &rsv->node, rsv->mm_node.start, > +rsv->mm_node.size); > + > + if (unlikely(r)) > continue; > > dev_dbg(adev->dev, "Reservation 0x%llx - %lld, Succeeded\n", @@ > -333,26 +337,16 @@ int amdgpu_vram_mgr_query_page_status(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > return ret; > } > > -/** > - * amdgpu_vram_mgr_virt_start - update virtual start address > - * > - * @mem: ttm_resource to update > - * @node: just allocated node > - * > - * Calculate a virtual BO start address to easily check if everything > is CPU > - * accessible. > - */ > -static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_virt_start(struct ttm_resource *mem, > - struct drm_mm_node *node) > +static int sort_blocks(void *priv, const struct list_head *A, > + const struct list_head *B) Please prefix all function with amdgpu_vram_mgr_. Arun - ok > { > - unsigned long start; > + struct drm_buddy_block *a = list_entry(A, typeof(*a), link); > + struct drm_buddy_block *b = list_entry(B, typeof(*b), link); > > - start = node->start + node->size; > - if (start > mem->num_pages) > - start -= mem->num_pages; > + if (a->start < b->start) > + return -1; > else > - start = 0; > - mem->start = max(mem->start, start); > + return 1; > } > > /** > @@ -370,15 +364,20 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > const struct ttm_place *place, > struct ttm_resource **res) > { > - unsigned long lpfn, num_nodes, pages_per_node, pages_left, pages; > + unsigned long lpfn, pages_per_node, pages_left, pages; > struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); > struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(mgr); > uint64_t vis_usage = 0, mem_bytes, max_bytes; > + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node *vnode; > + struct drm_buddy_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; > struct ttm_range_mgr_node *node; > - struct drm_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; > - enum drm_mm_insert_mode mode; > + enum drm_buddy_alloc_mode mode; > + struct drm_buddy_block *block; > + unsigned int visible_pfn; > + bool bar_limit_enabled; > + unsigned long n_pages; > unsigned i; > - int r; > + int r = 0; Please don't initialize the return type here. That's considered bad coding style. Arun - will fix it > > lpfn = place->lpfn; > if (!lpfn) > @@ -395,10 +394,9 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > goto error_sub; > } > > - if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) { > + if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) > pages_per_node = ~0ul; > - num_nodes = 1; > - } else { > + else { > #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE > pages_per_node = HPAGE_PMD_NR; > #else > @@ -407,57 +405,97 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > #endif > pages_per_node = max_t(uint32_t, pages_per_node, > tbo->page_alignment); > - num_nodes = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(PFN_UP(mem_bytes), pages_per_node); > } > > - node = kvmalloc(struct_size(node, mm_nodes, num_nodes), > - GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO); > - if (!node) { > + vnode = kzalloc(sizeof(*vnode), GFP_KERNEL); > + > + if (!vnode) { > r = -ENOMEM; > goto error_sub; > } > > + node = &vnode->tnode; > + > ttm_resource_init(tbo, place, &node->base); > > - mode = DRM_MM_INSERT_BEST; > - if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN) > - mode = DRM_MM_INSERT_HIGH; > + bar_limit_enabled = !(amdgpu_gmc_vram_full_visible(&adev->gmc)); > + > + visible_pfn = adev->gmc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT; > + > + mode = DRM_BUDDY_BOTTOM_UP; > + if (!place->fpfn && lpfn == man->size && > + (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN)) > + /* Allocate blocks from CPU non-mappable (TOP-DOWN) region */ > + mode = DRM_BUDDY_TOP_DOWN; > + else if (place->fpfn || (lpfn != man->size && lpfn != visible_pfn)) > + /* Allocate blocks in desired range */ > + mode = DRM_BUDDY_ALLOC_RANGE; > > pages_left = node->base.num_pages; > > /* Limit maximum size to 2GB due to SG table limitations */ > pages = min(pages_left, 2UL << (30 - PAGE_SHIFT)); > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vnode->blocks); > + > i = 0; > - spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > - while (pages_left) { > - uint32_t alignment = tbo->page_alignment; > - > - if (pages >= pages_per_node) > - alignment = pages_per_node; > - > - r = drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(mm, &node->mm_nodes[i], pages, > - alignment, 0, place->fpfn, > - lpfn, mode); > - if (unlikely(r)) { > - if (pages > pages_per_node) { > - if (is_power_of_2(pages)) > - pages = pages / 2; > - else > - pages = rounddown_pow_of_two(pages); > - continue; > - } > - goto error_free; > - } > + if (mode == DRM_BUDDY_ALLOC_RANGE) { > + r = drm_buddy_alloc_range(mm, &vnode->blocks, > + (uint64_t)place->fpfn << PAGE_SHIFT, pages << PAGE_SHIFT); That handling won't work. It's possible that you need contiguous memory in a specific range. Arun - the existing default backend range handler allocates contiguous nodes in power of 2 finding the MSB's of the any given size. We get linked nodes (depends on the requested size) in continuous range of address. Example, for the size 768 pages request, we get 512 + 256 range of continuous address in 2 nodes. It works by passing the fpfn and the requested size, the backend handler calculates the lpfn by adding fpfn + size = lpfn. The drawback here are we are not handling the specific lpfn value (as of now it is calculated using the fpfn + requested size) and not following the pages_per_node rule. Please let me know if this won't work for all specific fpfn / lpfn cases > + > + if (unlikely(r)) > + goto error_free_res; > + } else { > + while (pages_left) { > + if (pages >= pages_per_node) > + pages = pages_per_node; > + > + n_pages = pages; > + > + if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) > + n_pages = roundup_pow_of_two(n_pages); That approach won't work either. For contiguous allocation you need to allocate one big chunk and then free up what you don't need at the end. Arun - ok, I will free up the unused pages > + > + do { > + unsigned int order; > + > + order = fls(n_pages) - 1; > + BUG_ON(order > mm->max_order); > + > + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > + block = drm_buddy_alloc(mm, order, bar_limit_enabled, > + visible_pfn, mode); That doesn't seem to make much sense either. The backend allocator should not care about the BAR size nor the visible_pfn. Arun - we are sending the BAR limit enable information (in case of APU or large BAR, we take different approach) and visible_pfn Information. In case of bar_limit_enabled is true, I thought visible_pfn required for the backend allocator to compare with the block start address and find the desired blocks for the TOP-DOWN and BOTTOM-UP approach (TOP-DOWN - return blocks higher than the visible_pfn limit, BOTTOM-UP - return blocks lower than the visible_pfn limit). In case of bar_limit_enabled is false, we just return the top ordered blocks and bottom most blocks for the TOP-DOWN and BOTTOM-UP respectively (suitable for APU and Large BAR case). Please let me know if we have other way to fix this problem > + spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > > - vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, &node->mm_nodes[i]); > - amdgpu_vram_mgr_virt_start(&node->base, &node->mm_nodes[i]); > - pages_left -= pages; > - ++i; > + if (IS_ERR(block)) { > + r = -ENOSPC; > + goto error_free_blocks; > + } > > - if (pages > pages_left) > - pages = pages_left; > + n_pages -= BIT(order); > + > + list_add_tail(&block->link, &vnode->blocks); > + > + if (!n_pages) > + break; > + } while (1); > + > + pages_left -= pages; > + ++i; > + > + if (pages > pages_left) > + pages = pages_left; > + } > } > + > + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > + list_sort(NULL, &vnode->blocks, sort_blocks); Why do you sort the list here? Regards, Christian. Arun - It gave better GLmark2 score when we sort the blocks in ascending order, Its not required, I will remove it Regards, Arun > + > + list_for_each_entry(block, &vnode->blocks, link) > + vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, block); > + > + block = list_first_entry_or_null(&vnode->blocks, > + struct drm_buddy_block, link); > + node->base.start = block->start; > spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > > if (i == 1) > @@ -472,12 +510,12 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > *res = &node->base; > return 0; > > -error_free: > - while (i--) > - drm_mm_remove_node(&node->mm_nodes[i]); > +error_free_blocks: > + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > + drm_buddy_free_list(mm, &vnode->blocks); > spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > - kvfree(node); > - > +error_free_res: > + kfree(vnode); > error_sub: > atomic64_sub(mem_bytes, &mgr->usage); > return r; > @@ -494,28 +532,28 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_del(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > struct ttm_resource *res) > { > - struct ttm_range_mgr_node *node = to_ttm_range_mgr_node(res); > + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node *vnode = to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(res); > struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); > struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(mgr); > + struct drm_buddy_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; > + struct drm_buddy_block *block; > uint64_t usage = 0, vis_usage = 0; > - unsigned i, pages; > > spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > - for (i = 0, pages = res->num_pages; pages; > - pages -= node->mm_nodes[i].size, ++i) { > - struct drm_mm_node *mm = &node->mm_nodes[i]; > - > - drm_mm_remove_node(mm); > - usage += mm->size << PAGE_SHIFT; > - vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, mm); > + list_for_each_entry(block, &vnode->blocks, link) { > + usage += block->size << PAGE_SHIFT; > + vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, block); > } > + > amdgpu_vram_mgr_do_reserve(man); > + > + drm_buddy_free_list(mm, &vnode->blocks); > spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > > atomic64_sub(usage, &mgr->usage); > atomic64_sub(vis_usage, &mgr->vis_usage); > > - kvfree(node); > + kfree(vnode); > } > > /** > @@ -668,12 +706,6 @@ uint64_t amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_usage(struct ttm_resource_manager *man) > static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_debug(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, > struct drm_printer *printer) > { > - struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); > - > - spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > - drm_mm_print(&mgr->mm, printer); > - spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > - > drm_printf(printer, "man size:%llu pages, ram usage:%lluMB, vis usage:%lluMB\n", > man->size, amdgpu_vram_mgr_usage(man) >> 20, > amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_usage(man) >> 20); @@ -701,7 +733,7 @@ int > amdgpu_vram_mgr_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > > man->func = &amdgpu_vram_mgr_func; > > - drm_mm_init(&mgr->mm, 0, man->size); > + drm_buddy_init(&mgr->mm, man->size << PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE); > spin_lock_init(&mgr->lock); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->reservations_pending); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->reserved_pages); > @@ -737,10 +769,10 @@ void amdgpu_vram_mgr_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > kfree(rsv); > > list_for_each_entry_safe(rsv, temp, &mgr->reserved_pages, node) { > - drm_mm_remove_node(&rsv->mm_node); > + drm_buddy_free(&mgr->mm, &rsv->mm_node); > kfree(rsv); > } > - drm_mm_takedown(&mgr->mm); > + drm_buddy_fini(&mgr->mm); > spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > > ttm_resource_manager_cleanup(man);
Am 21.09.21 um 17:51 schrieb Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin: > [AMD Public Use] > > Hi Christian, > Please find my comments. A better mail client might be helpful for mailing list communication. I use Thunderbird, but Outlook with appropriate setting should do as well. > > Thanks, > Arun > -----Original Message----- > From: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@amd.com> > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 2:34 PM > To: Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; matthew.auld@intel.com; daniel@ffwll.ch; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add drm buddy manager support to amdgpu driver > > Am 20.09.21 um 21:21 schrieb Arunpravin: > [SNIP] >> + struct list_head blocks; >> +}; >> + >> +static inline struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node * >> +to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(struct ttm_resource *res) { >> + return container_of(container_of(res, struct ttm_range_mgr_node, base), >> + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node, tnode); } >> + > Maybe stuff that in a separate amdgpu_vram_mgr.h file together with all the other defines for the vram manager. > > Arun - I thought about it, will create a new header file for vram manager Maybe make that a separate patch before this one here. >> + if (mode == DRM_BUDDY_ALLOC_RANGE) { >> + r = drm_buddy_alloc_range(mm, &vnode->blocks, >> + (uint64_t)place->fpfn << PAGE_SHIFT, pages << PAGE_SHIFT); > That handling won't work. It's possible that you need contiguous memory in a specific range. > > Arun - the existing default backend range handler allocates contiguous nodes in power of 2 finding the MSB's of > the any given size. We get linked nodes (depends on the requested size) in continuous range of address. > Example, for the size 768 pages request, we get 512 + 256 range of continuous address in 2 nodes. > > It works by passing the fpfn and the requested size, the backend handler calculates the lpfn by adding fpfn + size = lpfn. > The drawback here are we are not handling the specific lpfn value (as of now it is calculated using the fpfn + requested size) > and not following the pages_per_node rule. > > Please let me know if this won't work for all specific fpfn / lpfn cases From your description that sounds like it won't work at all for any cases. See the fpfn/lpfn specifies the range of allocation. For the most common case that's either 0..visible_vram or 0..start_of_some_hw_limitation. When you always try to allocate the range from 0 you will quickly find that you clash with existing allocations. What you need to do in general is to have a drm_buddy_alloc() which is able to limit the returned page to the desired range fpfn..lpfn. >> + >> + do { >> + unsigned int order; >> + >> + order = fls(n_pages) - 1; >> + BUG_ON(order > mm->max_order); >> + >> + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); >> + block = drm_buddy_alloc(mm, order, bar_limit_enabled, >> + visible_pfn, mode); > That doesn't seem to make much sense either. The backend allocator should not care about the BAR size nor the visible_pfn. > > Arun - we are sending the BAR limit enable information (in case of APU or large BAR, we take different approach) and visible_pfn > Information. > > In case of bar_limit_enabled is true, I thought visible_pfn required for the backend allocator to compare with the block start address > and find the desired blocks for the TOP-DOWN and BOTTOM-UP approach (TOP-DOWN - return blocks higher than the visible_pfn limit, > BOTTOM-UP - return blocks lower than the visible_pfn limit). > > In case of bar_limit_enabled is false, we just return the top ordered blocks and bottom most blocks for the TOP-DOWN and BOTTOM-UP > respectively (suitable for APU and Large BAR case). > > Please let me know if we have other way to fix this problem That is the completely wrong approach. The backend must not care about the BAR configuration and visibility of the VRAM. What it should do instead is to take the fpfn..lpfn range into account and make sure that all allocated pages are in the desired range. BOTTOM-UP vs. TOP-DOWN then just optimizes the algorithm because we insert all freed up TOP-DOWN pages at the end and all BOTTOM-UP pages at the front and on new allocations walk the lest of free pages from the front or back depending on the flag. > >> + spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); >> >> - vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, &node->mm_nodes[i]); >> - amdgpu_vram_mgr_virt_start(&node->base, &node->mm_nodes[i]); >> - pages_left -= pages; >> - ++i; >> + if (IS_ERR(block)) { >> + r = -ENOSPC; >> + goto error_free_blocks; >> + } >> >> - if (pages > pages_left) >> - pages = pages_left; >> + n_pages -= BIT(order); >> + >> + list_add_tail(&block->link, &vnode->blocks); >> + >> + if (!n_pages) >> + break; >> + } while (1); >> + >> + pages_left -= pages; >> + ++i; >> + >> + if (pages > pages_left) >> + pages = pages_left; >> + } >> } >> + >> + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); >> + list_sort(NULL, &vnode->blocks, sort_blocks); > Why do you sort the list here? > > Regards, > Christian. > > Arun - It gave better GLmark2 score when we sort the blocks in ascending order, > Its not required, I will remove it Interesting. Maybe add a TODO comment so that somebody could investigate why that happens. Regards, Christian.
[AMD Public Use] Hi Christian, Thanks for the review, I will the send the next version fixing all issues. Regards, Arun -----Original Message----- From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 12:18 PM To: Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; matthew.auld@intel.com; daniel@ffwll.ch; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add drm buddy manager support to amdgpu driver Am 21.09.21 um 17:51 schrieb Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin: > [AMD Public Use] > > Hi Christian, > Please find my comments. A better mail client might be helpful for mailing list communication. I use Thunderbird, but Outlook with appropriate setting should do as well. > > Thanks, > Arun > -----Original Message----- > From: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@amd.com> > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 2:34 PM > To: Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>; > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; > amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; matthew.auld@intel.com; > daniel@ffwll.ch; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add drm buddy manager support to amdgpu > driver > > Am 20.09.21 um 21:21 schrieb Arunpravin: > [SNIP] >> + struct list_head blocks; >> +}; >> + >> +static inline struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node * >> +to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(struct ttm_resource *res) { >> + return container_of(container_of(res, struct ttm_range_mgr_node, base), >> + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node, tnode); } >> + > Maybe stuff that in a separate amdgpu_vram_mgr.h file together with all the other defines for the vram manager. > > Arun - I thought about it, will create a new header file for vram > manager Maybe make that a separate patch before this one here. >> + if (mode == DRM_BUDDY_ALLOC_RANGE) { >> + r = drm_buddy_alloc_range(mm, &vnode->blocks, >> + (uint64_t)place->fpfn << PAGE_SHIFT, pages << PAGE_SHIFT); > That handling won't work. It's possible that you need contiguous memory in a specific range. > > Arun - the existing default backend range handler allocates contiguous > nodes in power of 2 finding the MSB's of the any given size. We get linked nodes (depends on the requested size) in continuous range of address. > Example, for the size 768 pages request, we get 512 + 256 range of continuous address in 2 nodes. > > It works by passing the fpfn and the requested size, the backend handler calculates the lpfn by adding fpfn + size = lpfn. > The drawback here are we are not handling the specific lpfn value (as > of now it is calculated using the fpfn + requested size) and not following the pages_per_node rule. > > Please let me know if this won't work for all specific fpfn / lpfn > cases From your description that sounds like it won't work at all for any cases. See the fpfn/lpfn specifies the range of allocation. For the most common case that's either 0..visible_vram or 0..start_of_some_hw_limitation. When you always try to allocate the range from 0 you will quickly find that you clash with existing allocations. What you need to do in general is to have a drm_buddy_alloc() which is able to limit the returned page to the desired range fpfn..lpfn. >> + >> + do { >> + unsigned int order; >> + >> + order = fls(n_pages) - 1; >> + BUG_ON(order > mm->max_order); >> + >> + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); >> + block = drm_buddy_alloc(mm, order, bar_limit_enabled, >> + visible_pfn, mode); > That doesn't seem to make much sense either. The backend allocator should not care about the BAR size nor the visible_pfn. > > Arun - we are sending the BAR limit enable information (in case of APU > or large BAR, we take different approach) and visible_pfn Information. > > In case of bar_limit_enabled is true, I thought visible_pfn required > for the backend allocator to compare with the block start address and > find the desired blocks for the TOP-DOWN and BOTTOM-UP approach (TOP-DOWN - return blocks higher than the visible_pfn limit, BOTTOM-UP - return blocks lower than the visible_pfn limit). > > In case of bar_limit_enabled is false, we just return the top ordered > blocks and bottom most blocks for the TOP-DOWN and BOTTOM-UP respectively (suitable for APU and Large BAR case). > > Please let me know if we have other way to fix this problem That is the completely wrong approach. The backend must not care about the BAR configuration and visibility of the VRAM. What it should do instead is to take the fpfn..lpfn range into account and make sure that all allocated pages are in the desired range. BOTTOM-UP vs. TOP-DOWN then just optimizes the algorithm because we insert all freed up TOP-DOWN pages at the end and all BOTTOM-UP pages at the front and on new allocations walk the lest of free pages from the front or back depending on the flag. > >> + spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); >> >> - vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, &node->mm_nodes[i]); >> - amdgpu_vram_mgr_virt_start(&node->base, &node->mm_nodes[i]); >> - pages_left -= pages; >> - ++i; >> + if (IS_ERR(block)) { >> + r = -ENOSPC; >> + goto error_free_blocks; >> + } >> >> - if (pages > pages_left) >> - pages = pages_left; >> + n_pages -= BIT(order); >> + >> + list_add_tail(&block->link, &vnode->blocks); >> + >> + if (!n_pages) >> + break; >> + } while (1); >> + >> + pages_left -= pages; >> + ++i; >> + >> + if (pages > pages_left) >> + pages = pages_left; >> + } >> } >> + >> + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); >> + list_sort(NULL, &vnode->blocks, sort_blocks); > Why do you sort the list here? > > Regards, > Christian. > > Arun - It gave better GLmark2 score when we sort the blocks in > ascending order, Its not required, I will remove it Interesting. Maybe add a TODO comment so that somebody could investigate why that happens. Regards, Christian.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h index acfa207cf970..ba24052e9062 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h @@ -30,12 +30,25 @@ #include <drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h> #include <drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.h> +struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node { + struct ttm_range_mgr_node tnode; + struct list_head blocks; +}; + +static inline struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node * +to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(struct ttm_resource *res) +{ + return container_of(container_of(res, struct ttm_range_mgr_node, base), + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node, tnode); +} + /* state back for walking over vram_mgr and gtt_mgr allocations */ struct amdgpu_res_cursor { uint64_t start; uint64_t size; uint64_t remaining; - struct drm_mm_node *node; + void *node; + uint32_t mem_type; }; /** @@ -52,8 +65,6 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_first(struct ttm_resource *res, uint64_t start, uint64_t size, struct amdgpu_res_cursor *cur) { - struct drm_mm_node *node; - if (!res || res->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM) { cur->start = start; cur->size = size; @@ -65,14 +76,39 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_first(struct ttm_resource *res, BUG_ON(start + size > res->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT); - node = to_ttm_range_mgr_node(res)->mm_nodes; - while (start >= node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) - start -= node++->size << PAGE_SHIFT; + cur->mem_type = res->mem_type; + + if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) { + struct drm_buddy_block *block; + struct list_head *head, *next; + + head = &to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(res)->blocks; + + block = list_first_entry_or_null(head, struct drm_buddy_block, link); + while (start >= block->size << PAGE_SHIFT) { + start -= block->size << PAGE_SHIFT; + + next = block->link.next; + if (next != head) + block = list_entry(next, struct drm_buddy_block, link); + } - cur->start = (node->start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start; - cur->size = min((node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) - start, size); - cur->remaining = size; - cur->node = node; + cur->start = (block->start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start; + cur->size = min((block->size << PAGE_SHIFT) - start, size); + cur->remaining = size; + cur->node = block; + } else if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) { + struct drm_mm_node *node; + + node = to_ttm_range_mgr_node(res)->mm_nodes; + while (start >= node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) + start -= node++->size << PAGE_SHIFT; + + cur->start = (node->start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start; + cur->size = min((node->size << PAGE_SHIFT) - start, size); + cur->remaining = size; + cur->node = node; + } } /** @@ -85,8 +121,6 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_first(struct ttm_resource *res, */ static inline void amdgpu_res_next(struct amdgpu_res_cursor *cur, uint64_t size) { - struct drm_mm_node *node = cur->node; - BUG_ON(size > cur->remaining); cur->remaining -= size; @@ -99,9 +133,23 @@ static inline void amdgpu_res_next(struct amdgpu_res_cursor *cur, uint64_t size) return; } - cur->node = ++node; - cur->start = node->start << PAGE_SHIFT; - cur->size = min(node->size << PAGE_SHIFT, cur->remaining); + if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) { + struct drm_buddy_block *block = cur->node; + struct list_head *next; + + next = block->link.next; + block = list_entry(next, struct drm_buddy_block, link); + + cur->node = block; + cur->start = block->start << PAGE_SHIFT; + cur->size = min(block->size << PAGE_SHIFT, cur->remaining); + } else if (cur->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) { + struct drm_mm_node *node = cur->node; + + cur->node = ++node; + cur->start = node->start << PAGE_SHIFT; + cur->size = min(node->size << PAGE_SHIFT, cur->remaining); + } } #endif diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h index e69f3e8e06e5..96c8e8aaa0ee 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include <linux/dma-direction.h> #include <drm/gpu_scheduler.h> +#include <drm/drm_buddy.h> #include "amdgpu.h" #define AMDGPU_PL_GDS (TTM_PL_PRIV + 0) @@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ struct amdgpu_vram_mgr { struct ttm_resource_manager manager; - struct drm_mm mm; + struct drm_buddy_mm mm; spinlock_t lock; struct list_head reservations_pending; struct list_head reserved_pages; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c index 7b2b0980ec41..de0c5f4cabaf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c @@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ */ #include <linux/dma-mapping.h> +#include <linux/list_sort.h> #include <drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.h> +#include <drm/drm_buddy.h> #include "amdgpu.h" #include "amdgpu_vm.h" @@ -33,7 +35,7 @@ struct amdgpu_vram_reservation { struct list_head node; - struct drm_mm_node mm_node; + struct drm_buddy_block mm_node; }; static inline struct amdgpu_vram_mgr * @@ -196,10 +198,10 @@ const struct attribute_group amdgpu_vram_mgr_attr_group = { * Calculate how many bytes of the MM node are inside visible VRAM */ static u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(struct amdgpu_device *adev, - struct drm_mm_node *node) + struct drm_buddy_block *block) { - uint64_t start = node->start << PAGE_SHIFT; - uint64_t end = (node->size + node->start) << PAGE_SHIFT; + uint64_t start = block->start << PAGE_SHIFT; + uint64_t end = (block->size + block->start) << PAGE_SHIFT; if (start >= adev->gmc.visible_vram_size) return 0; @@ -220,8 +222,8 @@ u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_bo_visible_size(struct amdgpu_bo *bo) { struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev); struct ttm_resource *res = bo->tbo.resource; - unsigned pages = res->num_pages; - struct drm_mm_node *mm; + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node *vnode = to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(res); + struct drm_buddy_block *block; u64 usage; if (amdgpu_gmc_vram_full_visible(&adev->gmc)) @@ -230,9 +232,8 @@ u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_bo_visible_size(struct amdgpu_bo *bo) if (res->start >= adev->gmc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) return 0; - mm = &container_of(res, struct ttm_range_mgr_node, base)->mm_nodes[0]; - for (usage = 0; pages; pages -= mm->size, mm++) - usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, mm); + list_for_each_entry(block, &vnode->blocks, link) + usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, block); return usage; } @@ -242,12 +243,15 @@ static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_do_reserve(struct ttm_resource_manager *man) { struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(mgr); - struct drm_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; + struct drm_buddy_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; struct amdgpu_vram_reservation *rsv, *temp; uint64_t vis_usage; + int r = 0; list_for_each_entry_safe(rsv, temp, &mgr->reservations_pending, node) { - if (drm_mm_reserve_node(mm, &rsv->mm_node)) + r = drm_buddy_alloc_range(mm, &rsv->node, rsv->mm_node.start, rsv->mm_node.size); + + if (unlikely(r)) continue; dev_dbg(adev->dev, "Reservation 0x%llx - %lld, Succeeded\n", @@ -333,26 +337,16 @@ int amdgpu_vram_mgr_query_page_status(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, return ret; } -/** - * amdgpu_vram_mgr_virt_start - update virtual start address - * - * @mem: ttm_resource to update - * @node: just allocated node - * - * Calculate a virtual BO start address to easily check if everything is CPU - * accessible. - */ -static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_virt_start(struct ttm_resource *mem, - struct drm_mm_node *node) +static int sort_blocks(void *priv, const struct list_head *A, + const struct list_head *B) { - unsigned long start; + struct drm_buddy_block *a = list_entry(A, typeof(*a), link); + struct drm_buddy_block *b = list_entry(B, typeof(*b), link); - start = node->start + node->size; - if (start > mem->num_pages) - start -= mem->num_pages; + if (a->start < b->start) + return -1; else - start = 0; - mem->start = max(mem->start, start); + return 1; } /** @@ -370,15 +364,20 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, const struct ttm_place *place, struct ttm_resource **res) { - unsigned long lpfn, num_nodes, pages_per_node, pages_left, pages; + unsigned long lpfn, pages_per_node, pages_left, pages; struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(mgr); uint64_t vis_usage = 0, mem_bytes, max_bytes; + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node *vnode; + struct drm_buddy_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; struct ttm_range_mgr_node *node; - struct drm_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; - enum drm_mm_insert_mode mode; + enum drm_buddy_alloc_mode mode; + struct drm_buddy_block *block; + unsigned int visible_pfn; + bool bar_limit_enabled; + unsigned long n_pages; unsigned i; - int r; + int r = 0; lpfn = place->lpfn; if (!lpfn) @@ -395,10 +394,9 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, goto error_sub; } - if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) { + if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) pages_per_node = ~0ul; - num_nodes = 1; - } else { + else { #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE pages_per_node = HPAGE_PMD_NR; #else @@ -407,57 +405,97 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, #endif pages_per_node = max_t(uint32_t, pages_per_node, tbo->page_alignment); - num_nodes = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(PFN_UP(mem_bytes), pages_per_node); } - node = kvmalloc(struct_size(node, mm_nodes, num_nodes), - GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO); - if (!node) { + vnode = kzalloc(sizeof(*vnode), GFP_KERNEL); + + if (!vnode) { r = -ENOMEM; goto error_sub; } + node = &vnode->tnode; + ttm_resource_init(tbo, place, &node->base); - mode = DRM_MM_INSERT_BEST; - if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN) - mode = DRM_MM_INSERT_HIGH; + bar_limit_enabled = !(amdgpu_gmc_vram_full_visible(&adev->gmc)); + + visible_pfn = adev->gmc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT; + + mode = DRM_BUDDY_BOTTOM_UP; + if (!place->fpfn && lpfn == man->size && + (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN)) + /* Allocate blocks from CPU non-mappable (TOP-DOWN) region */ + mode = DRM_BUDDY_TOP_DOWN; + else if (place->fpfn || (lpfn != man->size && lpfn != visible_pfn)) + /* Allocate blocks in desired range */ + mode = DRM_BUDDY_ALLOC_RANGE; pages_left = node->base.num_pages; /* Limit maximum size to 2GB due to SG table limitations */ pages = min(pages_left, 2UL << (30 - PAGE_SHIFT)); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vnode->blocks); + i = 0; - spin_lock(&mgr->lock); - while (pages_left) { - uint32_t alignment = tbo->page_alignment; - - if (pages >= pages_per_node) - alignment = pages_per_node; - - r = drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(mm, &node->mm_nodes[i], pages, - alignment, 0, place->fpfn, - lpfn, mode); - if (unlikely(r)) { - if (pages > pages_per_node) { - if (is_power_of_2(pages)) - pages = pages / 2; - else - pages = rounddown_pow_of_two(pages); - continue; - } - goto error_free; - } + if (mode == DRM_BUDDY_ALLOC_RANGE) { + r = drm_buddy_alloc_range(mm, &vnode->blocks, + (uint64_t)place->fpfn << PAGE_SHIFT, pages << PAGE_SHIFT); + + if (unlikely(r)) + goto error_free_res; + } else { + while (pages_left) { + if (pages >= pages_per_node) + pages = pages_per_node; + + n_pages = pages; + + if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) + n_pages = roundup_pow_of_two(n_pages); + + do { + unsigned int order; + + order = fls(n_pages) - 1; + BUG_ON(order > mm->max_order); + + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); + block = drm_buddy_alloc(mm, order, bar_limit_enabled, + visible_pfn, mode); + spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); - vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, &node->mm_nodes[i]); - amdgpu_vram_mgr_virt_start(&node->base, &node->mm_nodes[i]); - pages_left -= pages; - ++i; + if (IS_ERR(block)) { + r = -ENOSPC; + goto error_free_blocks; + } - if (pages > pages_left) - pages = pages_left; + n_pages -= BIT(order); + + list_add_tail(&block->link, &vnode->blocks); + + if (!n_pages) + break; + } while (1); + + pages_left -= pages; + ++i; + + if (pages > pages_left) + pages = pages_left; + } } + + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); + list_sort(NULL, &vnode->blocks, sort_blocks); + + list_for_each_entry(block, &vnode->blocks, link) + vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, block); + + block = list_first_entry_or_null(&vnode->blocks, + struct drm_buddy_block, link); + node->base.start = block->start; spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); if (i == 1) @@ -472,12 +510,12 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, *res = &node->base; return 0; -error_free: - while (i--) - drm_mm_remove_node(&node->mm_nodes[i]); +error_free_blocks: + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); + drm_buddy_free_list(mm, &vnode->blocks); spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); - kvfree(node); - +error_free_res: + kfree(vnode); error_sub: atomic64_sub(mem_bytes, &mgr->usage); return r; @@ -494,28 +532,28 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_del(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, struct ttm_resource *res) { - struct ttm_range_mgr_node *node = to_ttm_range_mgr_node(res); + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_node *vnode = to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_node(res); struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(mgr); + struct drm_buddy_mm *mm = &mgr->mm; + struct drm_buddy_block *block; uint64_t usage = 0, vis_usage = 0; - unsigned i, pages; spin_lock(&mgr->lock); - for (i = 0, pages = res->num_pages; pages; - pages -= node->mm_nodes[i].size, ++i) { - struct drm_mm_node *mm = &node->mm_nodes[i]; - - drm_mm_remove_node(mm); - usage += mm->size << PAGE_SHIFT; - vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, mm); + list_for_each_entry(block, &vnode->blocks, link) { + usage += block->size << PAGE_SHIFT; + vis_usage += amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, block); } + amdgpu_vram_mgr_do_reserve(man); + + drm_buddy_free_list(mm, &vnode->blocks); spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); atomic64_sub(usage, &mgr->usage); atomic64_sub(vis_usage, &mgr->vis_usage); - kvfree(node); + kfree(vnode); } /** @@ -668,12 +706,6 @@ uint64_t amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_usage(struct ttm_resource_manager *man) static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_debug(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, struct drm_printer *printer) { - struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = to_vram_mgr(man); - - spin_lock(&mgr->lock); - drm_mm_print(&mgr->mm, printer); - spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); - drm_printf(printer, "man size:%llu pages, ram usage:%lluMB, vis usage:%lluMB\n", man->size, amdgpu_vram_mgr_usage(man) >> 20, amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_usage(man) >> 20); @@ -701,7 +733,7 @@ int amdgpu_vram_mgr_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev) man->func = &amdgpu_vram_mgr_func; - drm_mm_init(&mgr->mm, 0, man->size); + drm_buddy_init(&mgr->mm, man->size << PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE); spin_lock_init(&mgr->lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->reservations_pending); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->reserved_pages); @@ -737,10 +769,10 @@ void amdgpu_vram_mgr_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev) kfree(rsv); list_for_each_entry_safe(rsv, temp, &mgr->reserved_pages, node) { - drm_mm_remove_node(&rsv->mm_node); + drm_buddy_free(&mgr->mm, &rsv->mm_node); kfree(rsv); } - drm_mm_takedown(&mgr->mm); + drm_buddy_fini(&mgr->mm); spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); ttm_resource_manager_cleanup(man);
Replace drm_mm with drm buddy manager for VRAM memory management Signed-off-by: Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com> --- .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h | 78 +++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c | 216 ++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)