Message ID | 20210929013719.25120-5-yong.wu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Clean up "mediatek,larb" | expand |
On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote: > MediaTek IOMMU-SMI diagram is like below. all the consumer connect with > smi-larb, then connect with smi-common. > > M4U > | > smi-common > | > ------------- > | | ... > | | > larb1 larb2 > | | > vdec venc > > When the consumer works, it should enable the smi-larb's power which > also need enable the smi-common's power firstly. > > Thus, First of all, use the device link connect the consumer and the > smi-larbs. then add device link between the smi-larb and smi-common. > > This patch adds device_link between the consumer and the larbs. > > When device_link_add, I add the flag DL_FLAG_STATELESS to avoid calling > pm_runtime_xx to keep the original status of clocks. It can avoid two > issues: > 1) Display HW show fastlogo abnormally reported in [1]. At the beggining, > all the clocks are enabled before entering kernel, but the clocks for > display HW(always in larb0) will be gated after clk_enable and clk_disable > called from device_link_add(->pm_runtime_resume) and rpm_idle. The clock > operation happened before display driver probe. At that time, the display > HW will be abnormal. > > 2) A deadlock issue reported in [2]. Use DL_FLAG_STATELESS to skip > pm_runtime_xx to avoid the deadlock. > > Corresponding, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER can't be added, then > device_link_removed should be added explicitly. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/1564213888.22908.4.camel@mhfsdcap03/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1086569/ > > Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> > Tested-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> # BPI-R2/MT7623 > --- > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > index d5848f78a677..a2fa55899434 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > @@ -560,22 +560,44 @@ static struct iommu_device *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) > { > struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); > struct mtk_iommu_data *data; > + struct device_link *link; > + struct device *larbdev; > + unsigned int larbid; > > if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops) > return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); /* Not a iommu client device */ > > data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); > > + /* > + * Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) > + * The device in each a larb is a independent HW. thus only link > + * one larb here. > + */ > + larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]); so larbid is always the same for all the ids of a device? If so maybe it worth testing it and return error if this is not the case. Thanks, Dafna > + larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev; > + link = device_link_add(dev, larbdev, > + DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS); > + if (!link) > + dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s\n", dev_name(larbdev)); > return &data->iommu; > } > > static void mtk_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev) > { > struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); > + struct mtk_iommu_data *data; > + struct device *larbdev; > + unsigned int larbid; > > if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops) > return; > > + data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); > + larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]); > + larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev; > + device_link_remove(dev, larbdev); > + > iommu_fwspec_free(dev); > } > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c > index 4d7809432239..e6f13459470e 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c > @@ -423,7 +423,9 @@ static struct iommu_device *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) > struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); > struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec; > struct mtk_iommu_data *data; > - int err, idx = 0; > + int err, idx = 0, larbid; > + struct device_link *link; > + struct device *larbdev; > > /* > * In the deferred case, free the existed fwspec. > @@ -453,6 +455,14 @@ static struct iommu_device *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) > > data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); > > + /* Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) */ > + larbid = mt2701_m4u_to_larb(fwspec->ids[0]); > + larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev; > + link = device_link_add(dev, larbdev, > + DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS); > + if (!link) > + dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s\n", dev_name(larbdev)); > + > return &data->iommu; > } > > @@ -473,10 +483,18 @@ static void mtk_iommu_probe_finalize(struct device *dev) > static void mtk_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev) > { > struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); > + struct mtk_iommu_data *data; > + struct device *larbdev; > + unsigned int larbid; > > if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops) > return; > > + data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); > + larbid = mt2701_m4u_to_larb(fwspec->ids[0]); > + larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev; > + device_link_remove(dev, larbdev); > + > iommu_fwspec_free(dev); > } > >
On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 14:36 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote: > > On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote: > > MediaTek IOMMU-SMI diagram is like below. all the consumer connect > > with > > smi-larb, then connect with smi-common. > > > > M4U > > | > > smi-common > > | > > ------------- > > | | ... > > | | > > larb1 larb2 > > | | > > vdec venc > > > > When the consumer works, it should enable the smi-larb's power > > which > > also need enable the smi-common's power firstly. > > > > Thus, First of all, use the device link connect the consumer and > > the > > smi-larbs. then add device link between the smi-larb and smi- > > common. > > > > This patch adds device_link between the consumer and the larbs. > > > > When device_link_add, I add the flag DL_FLAG_STATELESS to avoid > > calling > > pm_runtime_xx to keep the original status of clocks. It can avoid > > two > > issues: > > 1) Display HW show fastlogo abnormally reported in [1]. At the > > beggining, > > all the clocks are enabled before entering kernel, but the clocks > > for > > display HW(always in larb0) will be gated after clk_enable and > > clk_disable > > called from device_link_add(->pm_runtime_resume) and rpm_idle. The > > clock > > operation happened before display driver probe. At that time, the > > display > > HW will be abnormal. > > > > 2) A deadlock issue reported in [2]. Use DL_FLAG_STATELESS to skip > > pm_runtime_xx to avoid the deadlock. > > > > Corresponding, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER can't be added, then > > device_link_removed should be added explicitly. > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/1564213888.22908.4.camel@mhfsdcap03/ > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1086569/ > > > > Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org> > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> > > Tested-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> # BPI- > > R2/MT7623 > > --- > > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- > > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > index d5848f78a677..a2fa55899434 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > @@ -560,22 +560,44 @@ static struct iommu_device > > *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) > > { > > struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); > > struct mtk_iommu_data *data; > > + struct device_link *link; > > + struct device *larbdev; > > + unsigned int larbid; > > > > if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops) > > return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); /* Not a iommu client device > > */ > > > > data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); > > > > + /* > > + * Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) > > + * The device in each a larb is a independent HW. thus only > > link > > + * one larb here. > > + */ > > + larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]); > > so larbid is always the same for all the ids of a device? Yes. For me, each a dtsi node should represent a HW unit which can only connect one larb. > If so maybe it worth testing it and return error if this is not the > case. Thanks for the suggestion. This is very helpful. I did see someone put the different larbs in one node. I will check this, and add return EINVAL for this case. > > Thanks, > Dafna > >
On 16.10.21 04:23, Yong Wu wrote: > On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 14:36 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote: >> >> On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote: >>> MediaTek IOMMU-SMI diagram is like below. all the consumer connect >>> with >>> smi-larb, then connect with smi-common. >>> >>> M4U >>> | >>> smi-common >>> | >>> ------------- >>> | | ... >>> | | >>> larb1 larb2 >>> | | >>> vdec venc >>> >>> When the consumer works, it should enable the smi-larb's power >>> which >>> also need enable the smi-common's power firstly. >>> >>> Thus, First of all, use the device link connect the consumer and >>> the >>> smi-larbs. then add device link between the smi-larb and smi- >>> common. >>> >>> This patch adds device_link between the consumer and the larbs. >>> >>> When device_link_add, I add the flag DL_FLAG_STATELESS to avoid >>> calling >>> pm_runtime_xx to keep the original status of clocks. It can avoid >>> two >>> issues: >>> 1) Display HW show fastlogo abnormally reported in [1]. At the >>> beggining, >>> all the clocks are enabled before entering kernel, but the clocks >>> for >>> display HW(always in larb0) will be gated after clk_enable and >>> clk_disable >>> called from device_link_add(->pm_runtime_resume) and rpm_idle. The >>> clock >>> operation happened before display driver probe. At that time, the >>> display >>> HW will be abnormal. >>> >>> 2) A deadlock issue reported in [2]. Use DL_FLAG_STATELESS to skip >>> pm_runtime_xx to avoid the deadlock. >>> >>> Corresponding, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER can't be added, then >>> device_link_removed should be added explicitly. >>> >>> [1] >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/1564213888.22908.4.camel@mhfsdcap03/ >>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1086569/ >>> >>> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> >>> Tested-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> # BPI- >>> R2/MT7623 >>> --- >>> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- >>> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c >>> index d5848f78a677..a2fa55899434 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c >>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c >>> @@ -560,22 +560,44 @@ static struct iommu_device >>> *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) >>> { >>> struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); >>> struct mtk_iommu_data *data; >>> + struct device_link *link; >>> + struct device *larbdev; >>> + unsigned int larbid; >>> >>> if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops) >>> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); /* Not a iommu client device >>> */ >>> >>> data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); >>> >>> + /* >>> + * Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) >>> + * The device in each a larb is a independent HW. thus only >>> link >>> + * one larb here. >>> + */ >>> + larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]); >> >> so larbid is always the same for all the ids of a device? > > Yes. For me, each a dtsi node should represent a HW unit which can only > connect one larb. > >> If so maybe it worth testing it and return error if this is not the >> case. > > Thanks for the suggestion. This is very helpful. I did see someone put > the different larbs in one node. I will check this, and add return I am working on bugs found on media drivers, could you please point me to that wrong node? Will you send a fix to that node in the dtsi? Thanks, Dafna > EINVAL for this case. > >> >> Thanks, >> Dafna > >>>
On Mon, 2021-10-18 at 09:13 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote: > > On 16.10.21 04:23, Yong Wu wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 14:36 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote: > > > > > > On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote: > > > > MediaTek IOMMU-SMI diagram is like below. all the consumer > > > > connect > > > > with > > > > smi-larb, then connect with smi-common. > > > > > > > > M4U > > > > | > > > > smi-common > > > > | > > > > ------------- > > > > | | ... > > > > | | > > > > larb1 larb2 > > > > | | > > > > vdec venc > > > > > > > > When the consumer works, it should enable the smi-larb's power > > > > which > > > > also need enable the smi-common's power firstly. > > > > > > > > Thus, First of all, use the device link connect the consumer > > > > and > > > > the > > > > smi-larbs. then add device link between the smi-larb and smi- > > > > common. > > > > > > > > This patch adds device_link between the consumer and the larbs. > > > > > > > > When device_link_add, I add the flag DL_FLAG_STATELESS to avoid > > > > calling > > > > pm_runtime_xx to keep the original status of clocks. It can > > > > avoid > > > > two > > > > issues: > > > > 1) Display HW show fastlogo abnormally reported in [1]. At the > > > > beggining, > > > > all the clocks are enabled before entering kernel, but the > > > > clocks > > > > for > > > > display HW(always in larb0) will be gated after clk_enable and > > > > clk_disable > > > > called from device_link_add(->pm_runtime_resume) and rpm_idle. > > > > The > > > > clock > > > > operation happened before display driver probe. At that time, > > > > the > > > > display > > > > HW will be abnormal. > > > > > > > > 2) A deadlock issue reported in [2]. Use DL_FLAG_STATELESS to > > > > skip > > > > pm_runtime_xx to avoid the deadlock. > > > > > > > > Corresponding, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER can't be added, then > > > > device_link_removed should be added explicitly. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/1564213888.22908.4.camel@mhfsdcap03/ > > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1086569/ > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org> > > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> > > > > Tested-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> # BPI- > > > > R2/MT7623 > > > > --- > > > > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- > > > > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > > > b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > > > index d5848f78a677..a2fa55899434 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > > > @@ -560,22 +560,44 @@ static struct iommu_device > > > > *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) > > > > { > > > > struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = > > > > dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); > > > > struct mtk_iommu_data *data; > > > > + struct device_link *link; > > > > + struct device *larbdev; > > > > + unsigned int larbid; > > > > > > > > if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops) > > > > return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); /* Not a iommu client > > > > device > > > > */ > > > > > > > > data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); > > > > > > > > + /* > > > > + * Link the consumer device with the smi-larb > > > > device(supplier) > > > > + * The device in each a larb is a independent HW. thus > > > > only > > > > link > > > > + * one larb here. > > > > + */ > > > > + larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]); > > > > > > so larbid is always the same for all the ids of a device? > > > > Yes. For me, each a dtsi node should represent a HW unit which can > > only > > connect one larb. > > > > > If so maybe it worth testing it and return error if this is not > > > the > > > case. > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. This is very helpful. I did see someone > > put > > the different larbs in one node. I will check this, and add return > > I am working on bugs found on media drivers, could you please point > me to > that wrong node? > Will you send a fix to that node in the dtsi? sorry. I mean it happened in the internal branch and it has already been fixed internally, all the upstream nodes are ok for this. Thanks > > > Thanks, > Dafna > > > EINVAL for this case. > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Dafna > > > > > > > >
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c index d5848f78a677..a2fa55899434 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c @@ -560,22 +560,44 @@ static struct iommu_device *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) { struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); struct mtk_iommu_data *data; + struct device_link *link; + struct device *larbdev; + unsigned int larbid; if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops) return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); /* Not a iommu client device */ data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); + /* + * Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) + * The device in each a larb is a independent HW. thus only link + * one larb here. + */ + larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]); + larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev; + link = device_link_add(dev, larbdev, + DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS); + if (!link) + dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s\n", dev_name(larbdev)); return &data->iommu; } static void mtk_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev) { struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); + struct mtk_iommu_data *data; + struct device *larbdev; + unsigned int larbid; if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops) return; + data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); + larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]); + larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev; + device_link_remove(dev, larbdev); + iommu_fwspec_free(dev); } diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c index 4d7809432239..e6f13459470e 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c @@ -423,7 +423,9 @@ static struct iommu_device *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec; struct mtk_iommu_data *data; - int err, idx = 0; + int err, idx = 0, larbid; + struct device_link *link; + struct device *larbdev; /* * In the deferred case, free the existed fwspec. @@ -453,6 +455,14 @@ static struct iommu_device *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); + /* Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) */ + larbid = mt2701_m4u_to_larb(fwspec->ids[0]); + larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev; + link = device_link_add(dev, larbdev, + DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS); + if (!link) + dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s\n", dev_name(larbdev)); + return &data->iommu; } @@ -473,10 +483,18 @@ static void mtk_iommu_probe_finalize(struct device *dev) static void mtk_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev) { struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); + struct mtk_iommu_data *data; + struct device *larbdev; + unsigned int larbid; if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops) return; + data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); + larbid = mt2701_m4u_to_larb(fwspec->ids[0]); + larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev; + device_link_remove(dev, larbdev); + iommu_fwspec_free(dev); }