diff mbox series

[bpf-next,2/4] selftests/bpf: print subtest status line

Message ID 20211025223345.2136168-3-fallentree@fb.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series selftests/bpf: parallel mode improvement | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 10 maintainers not CCed: john.fastabend@gmail.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org daniel@iogearbox.net yhs@fb.com songliubraving@fb.com netdev@vger.kernel.org kafai@fb.com kpsingh@kernel.org shuah@kernel.org ast@kernel.org
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/checkpatch fail CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis CHECK: Lines should not end with a '(' ERROR: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar" ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 97 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next success VM_Test

Commit Message

Yucong Sun Oct. 25, 2021, 10:33 p.m. UTC
From: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>

This patch restores behavior that prints one status line for each
subtest executed. It works in both serial mode and parallel mode,  and
all verbosity settings.

The logic around IO hijacking could use some more simplification in the
future.

Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++-----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h |  4 ++
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko Oct. 26, 2021, 4:09 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 3:33 PM Yucong Sun <fallentree@fb.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
>
> This patch restores behavior that prints one status line for each
> subtest executed. It works in both serial mode and parallel mode,  and
> all verbosity settings.
>
> The logic around IO hijacking could use some more simplification in the
> future.
>

This feels like a big hack, not a proper solution. What if we extend
MSG_TEST_DONE to signal also sub-test completion (along with subtest
logs)? Would that work better and result in cleaner logic?

> Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h |  4 ++
>  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> index 1f4a48566991..ff4598126f9d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,18 @@ static bool should_run(struct test_selector *sel, int num, const char *name)
>         return num < sel->num_set_len && sel->num_set[num];
>  }
>
> +static void dump_subtest_status(bool display) {

please run checkpatch.pl

> +       fflush(env.subtest_status_fd);
> +       if (display) {
> +               if (env.subtest_status_cnt) {
> +                       env.subtest_status_buf[env.subtest_status_cnt] = '\0';
> +                       fputs(env.subtest_status_buf, stdout);
> +               }
> +       }
> +       rewind(env.subtest_status_fd);
> +       fflush(env.subtest_status_fd);
> +}
> +
>  static void dump_test_log(const struct prog_test_def *test, bool failed)
>  {
>         if (stdout == env.stdout)
> @@ -112,12 +124,17 @@ static void dump_test_log(const struct prog_test_def *test, bool failed)
>         fflush(stdout); /* exports env.log_buf & env.log_cnt */
>
>         if (env.verbosity > VERBOSE_NONE || test->force_log || failed) {
> -               if (env.log_cnt) {
> -                       env.log_buf[env.log_cnt] = '\0';
> -                       fprintf(env.stdout, "%s", env.log_buf);
> -                       if (env.log_buf[env.log_cnt - 1] != '\n')
> -                               fprintf(env.stdout, "\n");
> -               }
> +               dump_subtest_status(false);
> +       } else {
> +               rewind(stdout);
> +               dump_subtest_status(true);
> +               fflush(stdout);
> +       }
> +       if (env.log_cnt) {
> +               env.log_buf[env.log_cnt] = '\0';
> +               fprintf(env.stdout, "%s", env.log_buf);
> +               if (env.log_buf[env.log_cnt - 1] != '\n')
> +                       fprintf(env.stdout, "\n");
>         }
>  }
>
> @@ -183,7 +200,12 @@ void test__end_subtest(void)
>
>         dump_test_log(test, sub_error_cnt);
>
> +       // Print two copies here, one as part of full logs, another one will
> +       // only be used if there is no need to show full logs.

C++ style comments

>         fprintf(stdout, "#%d/%d %s/%s:%s\n",
> +               test->test_num, test->subtest_num, test->test_name, test->subtest_name,
> +               sub_error_cnt ? "FAIL" : (test->skip_cnt ? "SKIP" : "OK"));
> +       fprintf(env.subtest_status_fd, "#%d/%d %s/%s:%s\n",
>                test->test_num, test->subtest_num, test->test_name, test->subtest_name,
>                sub_error_cnt ? "FAIL" : (test->skip_cnt ? "SKIP" : "OK"));
>
> @@ -1250,6 +1272,15 @@ static int worker_main(int sock)
>
>                         run_one_test(test_to_run);
>
> +                       // discard logs if we don't need them

C++ style comment

> +                       if (env.verbosity > VERBOSE_NONE || test->force_log || test->error_cnt) {
> +                               dump_subtest_status(false);
> +                       } else {
> +                               rewind(stdout);
> +                               dump_subtest_status(true);
> +                               fflush(stdout);
> +                       }
> +
>                         stdio_restore();
>
>                         memset(&msg_done, 0, sizeof(msg_done));
> @@ -1260,10 +1291,9 @@ static int worker_main(int sock)
>                         msg_done.test_done.sub_succ_cnt = test->sub_succ_cnt;
>                         msg_done.test_done.have_log = false;
>
> -                       if (env.verbosity > VERBOSE_NONE || test->force_log || test->error_cnt) {
> -                               if (env.log_cnt)
> -                                       msg_done.test_done.have_log = true;
> -                       }
> +                       if (env.log_cnt)
> +                               msg_done.test_done.have_log = true;
> +
>                         if (send_message(sock, &msg_done) < 0) {
>                                 perror("Fail to send message done");
>                                 goto out;
> @@ -1357,6 +1387,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>
>         env.stdout = stdout;
>         env.stderr = stderr;
> +       env.subtest_status_fd = open_memstream(

extremely misleading name, it's not an FD at all

> +               &env.subtest_status_buf, &env.subtest_status_cnt);
> +       if (!env.subtest_status_fd) {
> +               perror("Failed to setup env.subtest_status_fd");
> +               exit(EXIT_ERR_SETUP_INFRA);
> +       }
>
>         env.has_testmod = true;
>         if (!env.list_test_names && load_bpf_testmod()) {
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> index 93c1ff705533..a564215a63b1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> @@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ struct test_env {
>         pid_t *worker_pids; /* array of worker pids */
>         int *worker_socks; /* array of worker socks */
>         int *worker_current_test; /* array of current running test for each worker */
> +
> +       FILE* subtest_status_fd; /* fd for printing status line for subtests */
> +       char *subtest_status_buf; /* buffer for subtests status */
> +       size_t subtest_status_cnt;
>  };
>
>  #define MAX_LOG_TRUNK_SIZE 8192
> --
> 2.30.2
>
sunyucong@gmail.com Oct. 26, 2021, 5:24 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 9:09 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 3:33 PM Yucong Sun <fallentree@fb.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
> >
> > This patch restores behavior that prints one status line for each
> > subtest executed. It works in both serial mode and parallel mode,  and
> > all verbosity settings.
> >
> > The logic around IO hijacking could use some more simplification in the
> > future.
> >
>
> This feels like a big hack, not a proper solution. What if we extend
> MSG_TEST_DONE to signal also sub-test completion (along with subtest
> logs)? Would that work better and result in cleaner logic?

I think the current solution is actually cleaner.  Yes we could add
fields in task struct to record each subtest's name and status and
generate the status line separately, but it will only work in
situations where all tests pass.
When there is an error, we do want to mix the status line with the
actual stdout logs, which we won't be able to do afterwards.

Besides, we will still need to implement separate logic in 3 places
(serial mode,  parallel mode in worker process, and serial part of
parallel mode execution). Having two copies of stdout logs is actually
not that bad.

>
> > Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h |  4 ++
> >  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> > index 1f4a48566991..ff4598126f9d 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> > @@ -100,6 +100,18 @@ static bool should_run(struct test_selector *sel, int num, const char *name)
> >         return num < sel->num_set_len && sel->num_set[num];
> >  }
> >
> > +static void dump_subtest_status(bool display) {
>
> please run checkpatch.pl
>
> > +       fflush(env.subtest_status_fd);
> > +       if (display) {
> > +               if (env.subtest_status_cnt) {
> > +                       env.subtest_status_buf[env.subtest_status_cnt] = '\0';
> > +                       fputs(env.subtest_status_buf, stdout);
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +       rewind(env.subtest_status_fd);
> > +       fflush(env.subtest_status_fd);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void dump_test_log(const struct prog_test_def *test, bool failed)
> >  {
> >         if (stdout == env.stdout)
> > @@ -112,12 +124,17 @@ static void dump_test_log(const struct prog_test_def *test, bool failed)
> >         fflush(stdout); /* exports env.log_buf & env.log_cnt */
> >
> >         if (env.verbosity > VERBOSE_NONE || test->force_log || failed) {
> > -               if (env.log_cnt) {
> > -                       env.log_buf[env.log_cnt] = '\0';
> > -                       fprintf(env.stdout, "%s", env.log_buf);
> > -                       if (env.log_buf[env.log_cnt - 1] != '\n')
> > -                               fprintf(env.stdout, "\n");
> > -               }
> > +               dump_subtest_status(false);
> > +       } else {
> > +               rewind(stdout);
> > +               dump_subtest_status(true);
> > +               fflush(stdout);
> > +       }
> > +       if (env.log_cnt) {
> > +               env.log_buf[env.log_cnt] = '\0';
> > +               fprintf(env.stdout, "%s", env.log_buf);
> > +               if (env.log_buf[env.log_cnt - 1] != '\n')
> > +                       fprintf(env.stdout, "\n");
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -183,7 +200,12 @@ void test__end_subtest(void)
> >
> >         dump_test_log(test, sub_error_cnt);
> >
> > +       // Print two copies here, one as part of full logs, another one will
> > +       // only be used if there is no need to show full logs.
>
> C++ style comments
>
> >         fprintf(stdout, "#%d/%d %s/%s:%s\n",
> > +               test->test_num, test->subtest_num, test->test_name, test->subtest_name,
> > +               sub_error_cnt ? "FAIL" : (test->skip_cnt ? "SKIP" : "OK"));
> > +       fprintf(env.subtest_status_fd, "#%d/%d %s/%s:%s\n",
> >                test->test_num, test->subtest_num, test->test_name, test->subtest_name,
> >                sub_error_cnt ? "FAIL" : (test->skip_cnt ? "SKIP" : "OK"));
> >
> > @@ -1250,6 +1272,15 @@ static int worker_main(int sock)
> >
> >                         run_one_test(test_to_run);
> >
> > +                       // discard logs if we don't need them
>
> C++ style comment
>
> > +                       if (env.verbosity > VERBOSE_NONE || test->force_log || test->error_cnt) {
> > +                               dump_subtest_status(false);
> > +                       } else {
> > +                               rewind(stdout);
> > +                               dump_subtest_status(true);
> > +                               fflush(stdout);
> > +                       }
> > +
> >                         stdio_restore();
> >
> >                         memset(&msg_done, 0, sizeof(msg_done));
> > @@ -1260,10 +1291,9 @@ static int worker_main(int sock)
> >                         msg_done.test_done.sub_succ_cnt = test->sub_succ_cnt;
> >                         msg_done.test_done.have_log = false;
> >
> > -                       if (env.verbosity > VERBOSE_NONE || test->force_log || test->error_cnt) {
> > -                               if (env.log_cnt)
> > -                                       msg_done.test_done.have_log = true;
> > -                       }
> > +                       if (env.log_cnt)
> > +                               msg_done.test_done.have_log = true;
> > +
> >                         if (send_message(sock, &msg_done) < 0) {
> >                                 perror("Fail to send message done");
> >                                 goto out;
> > @@ -1357,6 +1387,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >
> >         env.stdout = stdout;
> >         env.stderr = stderr;
> > +       env.subtest_status_fd = open_memstream(
>
> extremely misleading name, it's not an FD at all

it is indeed a file descriptor, isn't it? What's a better name for it?

>
> > +               &env.subtest_status_buf, &env.subtest_status_cnt);
> > +       if (!env.subtest_status_fd) {
> > +               perror("Failed to setup env.subtest_status_fd");
> > +               exit(EXIT_ERR_SETUP_INFRA);
> > +       }
> >
> >         env.has_testmod = true;
> >         if (!env.list_test_names && load_bpf_testmod()) {
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> > index 93c1ff705533..a564215a63b1 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> > @@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ struct test_env {
> >         pid_t *worker_pids; /* array of worker pids */
> >         int *worker_socks; /* array of worker socks */
> >         int *worker_current_test; /* array of current running test for each worker */
> > +
> > +       FILE* subtest_status_fd; /* fd for printing status line for subtests */
> > +       char *subtest_status_buf; /* buffer for subtests status */
> > +       size_t subtest_status_cnt;
> >  };
> >
> >  #define MAX_LOG_TRUNK_SIZE 8192
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
Andrii Nakryiko Oct. 27, 2021, 4:46 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:24 AM sunyucong@gmail.com
<sunyucong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 9:09 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 3:33 PM Yucong Sun <fallentree@fb.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > This patch restores behavior that prints one status line for each
> > > subtest executed. It works in both serial mode and parallel mode,  and
> > > all verbosity settings.
> > >
> > > The logic around IO hijacking could use some more simplification in the
> > > future.
> > >
> >
> > This feels like a big hack, not a proper solution. What if we extend
> > MSG_TEST_DONE to signal also sub-test completion (along with subtest
> > logs)? Would that work better and result in cleaner logic?
>
> I think the current solution is actually cleaner.  Yes we could add

I disagree. Subtest is a first-class citizen, even if it's harder to
parallelize due to more dynamic nature. Having protocol that reflects
the fact that test can consist of subtests is the right way to go, I
think.

> fields in task struct to record each subtest's name and status and
> generate the status line separately, but it will only work in
> situations where all tests pass.
> When there is an error, we do want to mix the status line with the
> actual stdout logs, which we won't be able to do afterwards.

I don't understand why success of failure is different. Worker
shouldn't log status line into the logs and should send subtest logs
separately from subtest name and status. And then dispatcher thread
will print log (depending on success/failure and/or verbosity
settings) and pre-defined status line. Status line is a fixed-format
thing that's derived from subtest name and its success/failure result.
It's not part of "log" per se.

>
> Besides, we will still need to implement separate logic in 3 places
> (serial mode,  parallel mode in worker process, and serial part of
> parallel mode execution). Having two copies of stdout logs is actually
> not that bad.

Which is exactly why I was asking to reuse sequential loop, so that we
only have 2 loops. You felt it's not big deal. Maybe now is time to
rethink this?

Two copies of logs is certainly a design smell, so please give it some
thought and try to fix the protocol to accommodate subtests as a
concept.

>
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h |  4 ++
> > >  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >

[...]

> > > @@ -1357,6 +1387,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > >
> > >         env.stdout = stdout;
> > >         env.stderr = stderr;
> > > +       env.subtest_status_fd = open_memstream(
> >
> > extremely misleading name, it's not an FD at all
>
> it is indeed a file descriptor, isn't it? What's a better name for it?

FD is an integer. This one is FILE *, so it may be "file", but
certainly not an fd.

>
> >
> > > +               &env.subtest_status_buf, &env.subtest_status_cnt);
> > > +       if (!env.subtest_status_fd) {
> > > +               perror("Failed to setup env.subtest_status_fd");
> > > +               exit(EXIT_ERR_SETUP_INFRA);
> > > +       }
> > >
> > >         env.has_testmod = true;
> > >         if (!env.list_test_names && load_bpf_testmod()) {
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> > > index 93c1ff705533..a564215a63b1 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> > > @@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ struct test_env {
> > >         pid_t *worker_pids; /* array of worker pids */
> > >         int *worker_socks; /* array of worker socks */
> > >         int *worker_current_test; /* array of current running test for each worker */
> > > +
> > > +       FILE* subtest_status_fd; /* fd for printing status line for subtests */
> > > +       char *subtest_status_buf; /* buffer for subtests status */
> > > +       size_t subtest_status_cnt;
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  #define MAX_LOG_TRUNK_SIZE 8192
> > > --
> > > 2.30.2
> > >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
index 1f4a48566991..ff4598126f9d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@ -100,6 +100,18 @@  static bool should_run(struct test_selector *sel, int num, const char *name)
 	return num < sel->num_set_len && sel->num_set[num];
 }
 
+static void dump_subtest_status(bool display) {
+	fflush(env.subtest_status_fd);
+	if (display) {
+		if (env.subtest_status_cnt) {
+			env.subtest_status_buf[env.subtest_status_cnt] = '\0';
+			fputs(env.subtest_status_buf, stdout);
+		}
+	}
+	rewind(env.subtest_status_fd);
+	fflush(env.subtest_status_fd);
+}
+
 static void dump_test_log(const struct prog_test_def *test, bool failed)
 {
 	if (stdout == env.stdout)
@@ -112,12 +124,17 @@  static void dump_test_log(const struct prog_test_def *test, bool failed)
 	fflush(stdout); /* exports env.log_buf & env.log_cnt */
 
 	if (env.verbosity > VERBOSE_NONE || test->force_log || failed) {
-		if (env.log_cnt) {
-			env.log_buf[env.log_cnt] = '\0';
-			fprintf(env.stdout, "%s", env.log_buf);
-			if (env.log_buf[env.log_cnt - 1] != '\n')
-				fprintf(env.stdout, "\n");
-		}
+		dump_subtest_status(false);
+	} else {
+		rewind(stdout);
+		dump_subtest_status(true);
+		fflush(stdout);
+	}
+	if (env.log_cnt) {
+		env.log_buf[env.log_cnt] = '\0';
+		fprintf(env.stdout, "%s", env.log_buf);
+		if (env.log_buf[env.log_cnt - 1] != '\n')
+			fprintf(env.stdout, "\n");
 	}
 }
 
@@ -183,7 +200,12 @@  void test__end_subtest(void)
 
 	dump_test_log(test, sub_error_cnt);
 
+	// Print two copies here, one as part of full logs, another one will
+	// only be used if there is no need to show full logs.
 	fprintf(stdout, "#%d/%d %s/%s:%s\n",
+		test->test_num, test->subtest_num, test->test_name, test->subtest_name,
+		sub_error_cnt ? "FAIL" : (test->skip_cnt ? "SKIP" : "OK"));
+	fprintf(env.subtest_status_fd, "#%d/%d %s/%s:%s\n",
 	       test->test_num, test->subtest_num, test->test_name, test->subtest_name,
 	       sub_error_cnt ? "FAIL" : (test->skip_cnt ? "SKIP" : "OK"));
 
@@ -1250,6 +1272,15 @@  static int worker_main(int sock)
 
 			run_one_test(test_to_run);
 
+			// discard logs if we don't need them
+			if (env.verbosity > VERBOSE_NONE || test->force_log || test->error_cnt) {
+				dump_subtest_status(false);
+			} else {
+				rewind(stdout);
+				dump_subtest_status(true);
+				fflush(stdout);
+			}
+
 			stdio_restore();
 
 			memset(&msg_done, 0, sizeof(msg_done));
@@ -1260,10 +1291,9 @@  static int worker_main(int sock)
 			msg_done.test_done.sub_succ_cnt = test->sub_succ_cnt;
 			msg_done.test_done.have_log = false;
 
-			if (env.verbosity > VERBOSE_NONE || test->force_log || test->error_cnt) {
-				if (env.log_cnt)
-					msg_done.test_done.have_log = true;
-			}
+			if (env.log_cnt)
+				msg_done.test_done.have_log = true;
+
 			if (send_message(sock, &msg_done) < 0) {
 				perror("Fail to send message done");
 				goto out;
@@ -1357,6 +1387,12 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	env.stdout = stdout;
 	env.stderr = stderr;
+	env.subtest_status_fd = open_memstream(
+		&env.subtest_status_buf, &env.subtest_status_cnt);
+	if (!env.subtest_status_fd) {
+		perror("Failed to setup env.subtest_status_fd");
+		exit(EXIT_ERR_SETUP_INFRA);
+	}
 
 	env.has_testmod = true;
 	if (!env.list_test_names && load_bpf_testmod()) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
index 93c1ff705533..a564215a63b1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
@@ -89,6 +89,10 @@  struct test_env {
 	pid_t *worker_pids; /* array of worker pids */
 	int *worker_socks; /* array of worker socks */
 	int *worker_current_test; /* array of current running test for each worker */
+
+	FILE* subtest_status_fd; /* fd for printing status line for subtests */
+	char *subtest_status_buf; /* buffer for subtests status */
+	size_t subtest_status_cnt;
 };
 
 #define MAX_LOG_TRUNK_SIZE 8192