Message ID | 20211027170256.18223-1-iwj@xenproject.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ts-xen-build: explicitly enable/disable configure features | expand |
On 27.10.21 19:02, Ian Jackson wrote: > The existing code depends on precisely whether the non-default option > appearing in the configure script is indeed the opposite of the option > we want to pass. > > Right now it seems to be working but this seems fragile. Do it > differently. > > I have verified that with current Xen, on arm64: > > + egrep -q -- '--disable-xend|--enable-xend' tools/configure > + egrep -q -- '--disable-ovmf|--enable-ovmf' tools/configure > + enable_opts=' --enable-ovmf' > + egrep -q -- '--disable-qemu-traditional|--enable-qemu-traditional' tools/configure > + enable_opts=' --enable-ovmf --disable-qemu-traditional' > + ./configure --sysconfdir=/etc --enable-ovmf --disable-qemu-traditional > > and on amd64: > > + egrep -q -- '--disable-xend|--enable-xend' tools/configure > + egrep -q -- '--disable-ovmf|--enable-ovmf' tools/configure > + enable_opts=' --enable-ovmf' > + egrep -q -- '--disable-qemu-traditional|--enable-qemu-traditional' tools/configure > + enable_opts=' --enable-ovmf --enable-qemu-traditional' > + ./configure --sysconfdir=/etc --enable-ovmf --enable-qemu-traditional > > Juergen, I would appreciate a review from you. I think I would like > this in osstest production before changing the qemu trad build default > in Xen. Far from being a Perl expert I agree this is a sensible approach and it should do the right thing. It will still depend on no unsupported option being mentioned in any comment, e.g. "# option --enable-foo is no longer supported" will result in a wrong positive when testing for feature "foo". In the end this will break the build, so it should be easy to detect in case this happens some time in the future. As there is no way to print out all supported options, this could only be solved by adding "--disable-option-checking", which has other disadvantages. You can add my: Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Juergen
Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 0/2] ts-xen-build: explicitly enable/disable configure features"): > Far from being a Perl expert I agree this is a sensible approach and it > should do the right thing. > > It will still depend on no unsupported option being mentioned in any > comment, e.g. "# option --enable-foo is no longer supported" will result > in a wrong positive when testing for feature "foo". In the end this will > break the build, so it should be easy to detect in case this happens > some time in the future. > > As there is no way to print out all supported options, this could only > be solved by adding "--disable-option-checking", which has other > disadvantages. > > You can add my: > > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Thank you for your detailed review and analysis. I have pushed this to osstest pretest. Ian.