Message ID | 20210916154635.1525-5-german.gomez@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/5] perf cs-etm: Print size using consistent format | expand |
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 04:46:35PM +0100, German Gomez wrote: > Shell script test_arm_spe.sh has been added to test the recording of SPE > tracing events in snapshot mode. > > Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> > --- > tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 000000000000..9ed817e76f95 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > +# Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples > + > +# Uses the 'perf record' to record trace data of Arm SPE events; > +# then verify if any SPE event samples are generated by SPE with > +# 'perf script' and 'perf report' commands. > + > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +# German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>, 2021 > + > +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event() { > + perf list | egrep -q 'arm_spe_[0-9]+//' && return 0 > + > + # arm_spe event doesn't exist > + return 2 > +} > + > +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event || exit 2 > + > +perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX) > +glb_err=0 > + > +cleanup_files() > +{ > + rm -f ${perfdata} > + trap - exit term int > + kill -2 $$ # Forward sigint to parent I understand you copy this code from Arm cs-etm testing, but I found the sentence 'kill -2 $$' will cause a failure at my side with the command: root@ubuntu:/home/leoy/linux/tools/perf# ./perf test 85 -v 85: Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples : --- start --- test child forked, pid 29053 Recording trace with snapshot mode /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.uughb Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples: Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples: SPE snapshot testing: PASS test child finished with -1 ---- end ---- Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples: FAILED! I changed to use below code and looks it works for me: if [[ "$1" == "int" ]]; then kill -SIGINT $$ fi if [[ "$1" == "term" ]]; then kill -SIGTERM $$ fi Thanks, Leo > + exit $glb_err > +} > + > +trap cleanup_files exit term int > + > +arm_spe_report() { > + if [ $2 != 0 ]; then > + echo "$1: FAIL" > + glb_err=$2 > + else > + echo "$1: PASS" > + fi > +} > + > +perf_script_samples() { > + echo "Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples:" > + > + # from arm-spe.c/arm_spe_synth_events() > + events="(ld1-miss|ld1-access|llc-miss|lld-access|tlb-miss|tlb-access|branch-miss|remote-access|memory)" > + > + # Below is an example of the samples dumping: > + # dd 3048 [002] 1 l1d-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) > + # dd 3048 [002] 1 tlb-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) > + # dd 3048 [002] 1 memory: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) > + perf script -F,-time -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ > + egrep " +$1 +[0-9]+ .* +${events}:(.*:)? +" > /dev/null 2>&1 > +} > + > +perf_report_samples() { > + echo "Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples:" > + > + # Below is an example of the samples reporting: > + # 73.04% 73.04% dd libc-2.27.so [.] _dl_addr > + # 7.71% 7.71% dd libc-2.27.so [.] getenv > + # 2.59% 2.59% dd ld-2.27.so [.] strcmp > + perf report --stdio -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ > + egrep " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +$1 " > /dev/null 2>&1 > +} > + > +arm_spe_snapshot_test() { > + echo "Recording trace with snapshot mode $perfdata" > + perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -S \ > + -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 & > + PERFPID=$! > + > + # Wait for perf program > + sleep 1 > + > + # Send signal to snapshot trace data > + kill -USR2 $PERFPID > + > + # Stop perf program > + kill $PERFPID > + wait $PERFPID > + > + perf_script_samples dd && > + perf_report_samples dd > + > + err=$? > + arm_spe_report "SPE snapshot testing" $err > +} > + > +arm_spe_snapshot_test > +exit $glb_err > \ No newline at end of file > -- > 2.17.1 >
Hi Leo, I'm unable to reproduce. I've tried on top of the most recent perf/core branch but I still get exit code 0 consistently: $ git log commit be8ecc57f180415e8a7c1cc5620c5236be2a7e56 (grafted, origin/perf/core) Author: Tony Garnock-Jones <tonyg@leastfixedpoint.com> Date: Thu Sep 16 14:09:39 2021 +0200 $ ./perf test 88 -v Couldn't bump rlimit(MEMLOCK), failures may take place when creating BPF maps, etc 88: Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples : --- start --- test child forked, pid 18700 Recording trace with snapshot mode /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.xgsUt Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples: Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples: SPE snapshot testing: PASS test child finished with 0 ---- end ---- Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples: Ok On 20/10/2021 14:13, Leo Yan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 04:46:35PM +0100, German Gomez wrote: >> Shell script test_arm_spe.sh has been added to test the recording of SPE >> tracing events in snapshot mode. >> >> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> >> --- >> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+) >> create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh >> new file mode 100755 >> index 000000000000..9ed817e76f95 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh >> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ >> +#!/bin/sh >> +# Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples >> + >> +# Uses the 'perf record' to record trace data of Arm SPE events; >> +# then verify if any SPE event samples are generated by SPE with >> +# 'perf script' and 'perf report' commands. >> + >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +# German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>, 2021 >> + >> +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event() { >> + perf list | egrep -q 'arm_spe_[0-9]+//' && return 0 >> + >> + # arm_spe event doesn't exist >> + return 2 >> +} >> + >> +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event || exit 2 >> + >> +perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX) >> +glb_err=0 >> + >> +cleanup_files() >> +{ >> + rm -f ${perfdata} >> + trap - exit term int >> + kill -2 $$ # Forward sigint to parent > I understand you copy this code from Arm cs-etm testing, but I found > the sentence 'kill -2 $$' will cause a failure at my side with the > command: > > root@ubuntu:/home/leoy/linux/tools/perf# ./perf test 85 -v > 85: Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples : > --- start --- > test child forked, pid 29053 > Recording trace with snapshot mode /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.uughb > Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples: > Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples: > SPE snapshot testing: PASS > test child finished with -1 > ---- end ---- > Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples: FAILED! > > I changed to use below code and looks it works for me: > > if [[ "$1" == "int" ]]; then > kill -SIGINT $$ > fi > if [[ "$1" == "term" ]]; then > kill -SIGTERM $$ > fi > > Thanks, > Leo > >> + exit $glb_err >> +} >> + >> +trap cleanup_files exit term int >> + >> +arm_spe_report() { >> + if [ $2 != 0 ]; then >> + echo "$1: FAIL" >> + glb_err=$2 >> + else >> + echo "$1: PASS" >> + fi >> +} >> + >> +perf_script_samples() { >> + echo "Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples:" >> + >> + # from arm-spe.c/arm_spe_synth_events() >> + events="(ld1-miss|ld1-access|llc-miss|lld-access|tlb-miss|tlb-access|branch-miss|remote-access|memory)" >> + >> + # Below is an example of the samples dumping: >> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 l1d-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 tlb-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 memory: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >> + perf script -F,-time -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ >> + egrep " +$1 +[0-9]+ .* +${events}:(.*:)? +" > /dev/null 2>&1 >> +} >> + >> +perf_report_samples() { >> + echo "Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples:" >> + >> + # Below is an example of the samples reporting: >> + # 73.04% 73.04% dd libc-2.27.so [.] _dl_addr >> + # 7.71% 7.71% dd libc-2.27.so [.] getenv >> + # 2.59% 2.59% dd ld-2.27.so [.] strcmp >> + perf report --stdio -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ >> + egrep " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +$1 " > /dev/null 2>&1 >> +} >> + >> +arm_spe_snapshot_test() { >> + echo "Recording trace with snapshot mode $perfdata" >> + perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -S \ >> + -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 & >> + PERFPID=$! >> + >> + # Wait for perf program >> + sleep 1 >> + >> + # Send signal to snapshot trace data >> + kill -USR2 $PERFPID >> + >> + # Stop perf program >> + kill $PERFPID >> + wait $PERFPID >> + >> + perf_script_samples dd && >> + perf_report_samples dd >> + >> + err=$? >> + arm_spe_report "SPE snapshot testing" $err >> +} >> + >> +arm_spe_snapshot_test >> +exit $glb_err >> \ No newline at end of file >> -- >> 2.17.1 >>
On 20/10/2021 14:13, Leo Yan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 04:46:35PM +0100, German Gomez wrote: >> Shell script test_arm_spe.sh has been added to test the recording of SPE >> tracing events in snapshot mode. >> >> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> >> --- >> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+) >> create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh >> new file mode 100755 >> index 000000000000..9ed817e76f95 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh >> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ >> +#!/bin/sh >> +# Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples >> + >> +# Uses the 'perf record' to record trace data of Arm SPE events; >> +# then verify if any SPE event samples are generated by SPE with >> +# 'perf script' and 'perf report' commands. >> + >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +# German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>, 2021 >> + >> +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event() { >> + perf list | egrep -q 'arm_spe_[0-9]+//' && return 0 >> + >> + # arm_spe event doesn't exist >> + return 2 >> +} >> + >> +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event || exit 2 >> + >> +perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX) >> +glb_err=0 >> + >> +cleanup_files() >> +{ >> + rm -f ${perfdata} >> + trap - exit term int >> + kill -2 $$ # Forward sigint to parent > > I understand you copy this code from Arm cs-etm testing, but I found > the sentence 'kill -2 $$' will cause a failure at my side with the > command: > > root@ubuntu:/home/leoy/linux/tools/perf# ./perf test 85 -v > 85: Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples : > --- start --- > test child forked, pid 29053 > Recording trace with snapshot mode /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.uughb > Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples: > Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples: > SPE snapshot testing: PASS > test child finished with -1 > ---- end ---- > Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples: FAILED! > > I changed to use below code and looks it works for me: > > if [[ "$1" == "int" ]]; then > kill -SIGINT $$ > fi > if [[ "$1" == "term" ]]; then > kill -SIGTERM $$ > fi > > Thanks, > Leo This is quite interesting. It looks like the issue is caused by the update from dash 0.5.8 on Ubuntu 18 to dash 0.5.10 on Ubuntu 20. Specifically the commit that causes the issue is: commit 9e5cd41d9605e4caaac3aacdc0482f6ee220a298 Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Date: Mon May 7 00:40:34 2018 +0800 jobs - Do not block when waiting on SIGCHLD Because of the nature of SIGCHLD, the process may have already been waited on and therefore we must be prepared for the case that wait may block. So ensure that it doesn't by using WNOHANG. Furthermore, multiple jobs may have exited when gotsigchld is set. Therefore we need to wait until there are no zombies left. Lastly, waitforjob needs to be called with interrupts off and the original patch broke that. Fixes: 03876c0743a5 ("eval: Reap zombies after built-in...") Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> This also means that the Coresight shell test will not be working anymore because I added the same trap to it so that it could be run in a loop. I'm going to compare the bahaviour to bash to see which one is doing the right thing and what the correct change to make to fix it is. Or a bug needs to be reported. Thanks James > >> + exit $glb_err >> +} >> + >> +trap cleanup_files exit term int >> + >> +arm_spe_report() { >> + if [ $2 != 0 ]; then >> + echo "$1: FAIL" >> + glb_err=$2 >> + else >> + echo "$1: PASS" >> + fi >> +} >> + >> +perf_script_samples() { >> + echo "Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples:" >> + >> + # from arm-spe.c/arm_spe_synth_events() >> + events="(ld1-miss|ld1-access|llc-miss|lld-access|tlb-miss|tlb-access|branch-miss|remote-access|memory)" >> + >> + # Below is an example of the samples dumping: >> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 l1d-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 tlb-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 memory: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >> + perf script -F,-time -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ >> + egrep " +$1 +[0-9]+ .* +${events}:(.*:)? +" > /dev/null 2>&1 >> +} >> + >> +perf_report_samples() { >> + echo "Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples:" >> + >> + # Below is an example of the samples reporting: >> + # 73.04% 73.04% dd libc-2.27.so [.] _dl_addr >> + # 7.71% 7.71% dd libc-2.27.so [.] getenv >> + # 2.59% 2.59% dd ld-2.27.so [.] strcmp >> + perf report --stdio -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ >> + egrep " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +$1 " > /dev/null 2>&1 >> +} >> + >> +arm_spe_snapshot_test() { >> + echo "Recording trace with snapshot mode $perfdata" >> + perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -S \ >> + -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 & >> + PERFPID=$! >> + >> + # Wait for perf program >> + sleep 1 >> + >> + # Send signal to snapshot trace data >> + kill -USR2 $PERFPID >> + >> + # Stop perf program >> + kill $PERFPID >> + wait $PERFPID >> + >> + perf_script_samples dd && >> + perf_report_samples dd >> + >> + err=$? >> + arm_spe_report "SPE snapshot testing" $err >> +} >> + >> +arm_spe_snapshot_test >> +exit $glb_err >> \ No newline at end of file >> -- >> 2.17.1 >>
On 02/11/2021 14:07, James Clark wrote: > > > On 20/10/2021 14:13, Leo Yan wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 04:46:35PM +0100, German Gomez wrote: >>> Shell script test_arm_spe.sh has been added to test the recording of SPE >>> tracing events in snapshot mode. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> >>> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> >>> --- >>> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh >>> >>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh >>> new file mode 100755 >>> index 000000000000..9ed817e76f95 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh >>> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ >>> +#!/bin/sh >>> +# Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples >>> + >>> +# Uses the 'perf record' to record trace data of Arm SPE events; >>> +# then verify if any SPE event samples are generated by SPE with >>> +# 'perf script' and 'perf report' commands. >>> + >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >>> +# German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>, 2021 >>> + >>> +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event() { >>> + perf list | egrep -q 'arm_spe_[0-9]+//' && return 0 >>> + >>> + # arm_spe event doesn't exist >>> + return 2 >>> +} >>> + >>> +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event || exit 2 >>> + >>> +perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX) >>> +glb_err=0 >>> + >>> +cleanup_files() >>> +{ >>> + rm -f ${perfdata} >>> + trap - exit term int >>> + kill -2 $$ # Forward sigint to parent >> >> I understand you copy this code from Arm cs-etm testing, but I found >> the sentence 'kill -2 $$' will cause a failure at my side with the >> command: >> >> root@ubuntu:/home/leoy/linux/tools/perf# ./perf test 85 -v >> 85: Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples : >> --- start --- >> test child forked, pid 29053 >> Recording trace with snapshot mode /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.uughb >> Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples: >> Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples: >> SPE snapshot testing: PASS >> test child finished with -1 >> ---- end ---- >> Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples: FAILED! >> >> I changed to use below code and looks it works for me: >> >> if [[ "$1" == "int" ]]; then >> kill -SIGINT $$ >> fi >> if [[ "$1" == "term" ]]; then >> kill -SIGTERM $$ >> fi >> >> Thanks, >> Leo > > This is quite interesting. It looks like the issue is caused by the update from dash 0.5.8 > on Ubuntu 18 to dash 0.5.10 on Ubuntu 20. Specifically the commit that causes the issue is: > > commit 9e5cd41d9605e4caaac3aacdc0482f6ee220a298 > Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> > Date: Mon May 7 00:40:34 2018 +0800 > > jobs - Do not block when waiting on SIGCHLD > > Because of the nature of SIGCHLD, the process may have already been > waited on and therefore we must be prepared for the case that wait > may block. So ensure that it doesn't by using WNOHANG. > > Furthermore, multiple jobs may have exited when gotsigchld is set. > Therefore we need to wait until there are no zombies left. > > Lastly, waitforjob needs to be called with interrupts off and > the original patch broke that. > > Fixes: 03876c0743a5 ("eval: Reap zombies after built-in...") > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> > > > This also means that the Coresight shell test will not be working anymore because I added > the same trap to it so that it could be run in a loop. I'm going to compare the bahaviour > to bash to see which one is doing the right thing and what the correct change to make to > fix it is. Or a bug needs to be reported. > > Thanks > James > Ok, it seems like I was relying on buggy dash behaviour for my original change. Even with this: if [[ "$1" == "int" ]]; then kill -SIGINT $$ fi if [[ "$1" == "term" ]]; then kill -SIGTERM $$ fi it still doesn't allow you to break out of running it in a while loop. This is only because of the exit code, rather than any kind of signal propagation. Actually it's possible to stop it with Ctrl-\ rather than Ctrl-C, and that doesn't require any extra handling in the script. For that reason I'm happy to go with Leo's original suggestion when I first added this which was to not have any extra kill at all. Another fix could be this, but I'm not too keen on it because I don't think any other tests behave like this: [ "$1" = "int" ] || exit 1 [ "$1" = "term" ] || exit 1 >> >>> + exit $glb_err >>> +} >>> + >>> +trap cleanup_files exit term int >>> + >>> +arm_spe_report() { >>> + if [ $2 != 0 ]; then >>> + echo "$1: FAIL" >>> + glb_err=$2 >>> + else >>> + echo "$1: PASS" >>> + fi >>> +} >>> + >>> +perf_script_samples() { >>> + echo "Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples:" >>> + >>> + # from arm-spe.c/arm_spe_synth_events() >>> + events="(ld1-miss|ld1-access|llc-miss|lld-access|tlb-miss|tlb-access|branch-miss|remote-access|memory)" >>> + >>> + # Below is an example of the samples dumping: >>> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 l1d-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >>> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 tlb-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >>> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 memory: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >>> + perf script -F,-time -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ >>> + egrep " +$1 +[0-9]+ .* +${events}:(.*:)? +" > /dev/null 2>&1 >>> +} >>> + >>> +perf_report_samples() { >>> + echo "Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples:" >>> + >>> + # Below is an example of the samples reporting: >>> + # 73.04% 73.04% dd libc-2.27.so [.] _dl_addr >>> + # 7.71% 7.71% dd libc-2.27.so [.] getenv >>> + # 2.59% 2.59% dd ld-2.27.so [.] strcmp >>> + perf report --stdio -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ >>> + egrep " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +$1 " > /dev/null 2>&1 >>> +} >>> + >>> +arm_spe_snapshot_test() { >>> + echo "Recording trace with snapshot mode $perfdata" >>> + perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -S \ >>> + -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 & >>> + PERFPID=$! >>> + >>> + # Wait for perf program >>> + sleep 1 >>> + >>> + # Send signal to snapshot trace data >>> + kill -USR2 $PERFPID >>> + >>> + # Stop perf program >>> + kill $PERFPID >>> + wait $PERFPID >>> + >>> + perf_script_samples dd && >>> + perf_report_samples dd >>> + >>> + err=$? >>> + arm_spe_report "SPE snapshot testing" $err >>> +} >>> + >>> +arm_spe_snapshot_test >>> +exit $glb_err >>> \ No newline at end of file >>> -- >>> 2.17.1 >>>
Hi James, Leo, Thank you for testing the patch. On 02/11/2021 15:37, James Clark wrote: > [...] > Ok, it seems like I was relying on buggy dash behaviour for my original change. Even with this: > > if [[ "$1" == "int" ]]; then > kill -SIGINT $$ > fi > if [[ "$1" == "term" ]]; then > kill -SIGTERM $$ > fi > > it still doesn't allow you to break out of running it in a while loop. This is only because of > the exit code, rather than any kind of signal propagation. Actually it's possible to stop it > with Ctrl-\ rather than Ctrl-C, and that doesn't require any extra handling in the script. > > For that reason I'm happy to go with Leo's original suggestion when I first added this which was > to not have any extra kill at all. Thanks for debugging the issue, I think I will consider this fix in the re-submission. Thanks, German > > Another fix could be this, but I'm not too keen on it because I don't think any other tests behave > like this: > > [ "$1" = "int" ] || exit 1 > [ "$1" = "term" ] || exit 1 > >>>> + exit $glb_err >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +trap cleanup_files exit term int >>>> + >>>> +arm_spe_report() { >>>> + if [ $2 != 0 ]; then >>>> + echo "$1: FAIL" >>>> + glb_err=$2 >>>> + else >>>> + echo "$1: PASS" >>>> + fi >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +perf_script_samples() { >>>> + echo "Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples:" >>>> + >>>> + # from arm-spe.c/arm_spe_synth_events() >>>> + events="(ld1-miss|ld1-access|llc-miss|lld-access|tlb-miss|tlb-access|branch-miss|remote-access|memory)" >>>> + >>>> + # Below is an example of the samples dumping: >>>> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 l1d-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >>>> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 tlb-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >>>> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 memory: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) >>>> + perf script -F,-time -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ >>>> + egrep " +$1 +[0-9]+ .* +${events}:(.*:)? +" > /dev/null 2>&1 >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +perf_report_samples() { >>>> + echo "Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples:" >>>> + >>>> + # Below is an example of the samples reporting: >>>> + # 73.04% 73.04% dd libc-2.27.so [.] _dl_addr >>>> + # 7.71% 7.71% dd libc-2.27.so [.] getenv >>>> + # 2.59% 2.59% dd ld-2.27.so [.] strcmp >>>> + perf report --stdio -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ >>>> + egrep " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +$1 " > /dev/null 2>&1 >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +arm_spe_snapshot_test() { >>>> + echo "Recording trace with snapshot mode $perfdata" >>>> + perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -S \ >>>> + -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 & >>>> + PERFPID=$! >>>> + >>>> + # Wait for perf program >>>> + sleep 1 >>>> + >>>> + # Send signal to snapshot trace data >>>> + kill -USR2 $PERFPID >>>> + >>>> + # Stop perf program >>>> + kill $PERFPID >>>> + wait $PERFPID >>>> + >>>> + perf_script_samples dd && >>>> + perf_report_samples dd >>>> + >>>> + err=$? >>>> + arm_spe_report "SPE snapshot testing" $err >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +arm_spe_snapshot_test >>>> +exit $glb_err >>>> \ No newline at end of file >>>> -- >>>> 2.17.1 >>>>
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000000..9ed817e76f95 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples + +# Uses the 'perf record' to record trace data of Arm SPE events; +# then verify if any SPE event samples are generated by SPE with +# 'perf script' and 'perf report' commands. + +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +# German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>, 2021 + +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event() { + perf list | egrep -q 'arm_spe_[0-9]+//' && return 0 + + # arm_spe event doesn't exist + return 2 +} + +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event || exit 2 + +perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX) +glb_err=0 + +cleanup_files() +{ + rm -f ${perfdata} + trap - exit term int + kill -2 $$ # Forward sigint to parent + exit $glb_err +} + +trap cleanup_files exit term int + +arm_spe_report() { + if [ $2 != 0 ]; then + echo "$1: FAIL" + glb_err=$2 + else + echo "$1: PASS" + fi +} + +perf_script_samples() { + echo "Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples:" + + # from arm-spe.c/arm_spe_synth_events() + events="(ld1-miss|ld1-access|llc-miss|lld-access|tlb-miss|tlb-access|branch-miss|remote-access|memory)" + + # Below is an example of the samples dumping: + # dd 3048 [002] 1 l1d-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) + # dd 3048 [002] 1 tlb-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) + # dd 3048 [002] 1 memory: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) + perf script -F,-time -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ + egrep " +$1 +[0-9]+ .* +${events}:(.*:)? +" > /dev/null 2>&1 +} + +perf_report_samples() { + echo "Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples:" + + # Below is an example of the samples reporting: + # 73.04% 73.04% dd libc-2.27.so [.] _dl_addr + # 7.71% 7.71% dd libc-2.27.so [.] getenv + # 2.59% 2.59% dd ld-2.27.so [.] strcmp + perf report --stdio -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ + egrep " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +$1 " > /dev/null 2>&1 +} + +arm_spe_snapshot_test() { + echo "Recording trace with snapshot mode $perfdata" + perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -S \ + -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 & + PERFPID=$! + + # Wait for perf program + sleep 1 + + # Send signal to snapshot trace data + kill -USR2 $PERFPID + + # Stop perf program + kill $PERFPID + wait $PERFPID + + perf_script_samples dd && + perf_report_samples dd + + err=$? + arm_spe_report "SPE snapshot testing" $err +} + +arm_spe_snapshot_test +exit $glb_err \ No newline at end of file