| Message ID | 20211122070528.837806-1-dfustini@baylibre.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | fa721d4f0b91f525339996f4faef7bb072d70162 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo | expand |
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>: On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 23:05:30 -0800 you wrote: > Fix trivial typo in comment from 'oveflow' to 'overflow'. > > Reported-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Here is the summary with links: - selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fa721d4f0b91 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c index aa76360d8f49..87e907add701 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static void test_btf_dump_struct_data(struct btf *btf, struct btf_dump *d, /* overflow bpf_sock_ops struct with final element nonzero/zero. * Regardless of the value of the final field, we don't have all the * data we need to display it, so we should trigger an overflow. - * In other words oveflow checking should trump "is field zero?" + * In other words overflow checking should trump "is field zero?" * checks because if we've overflowed, it shouldn't matter what the * field is - we can't trust its value so shouldn't display it. */
Fix trivial typo in comment from 'oveflow' to 'overflow'. Reported-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)