Message ID | 163700856423.565980.10162564921347693758.stgit@firesoul (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | igc: driver change to support XDP metadata | expand |
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:36:20 +0100 > Changes to fix and enable XDP metadata to a specific Intel driver igc. > Tested with hardware i225 that uses driver igc, while testing AF_XDP > access to metadata area. Would you mind if I take this your series into my bigger one that takes care of it throughout all the Intel drivers? > --- > > Jesper Dangaard Brouer (2): > igc: AF_XDP zero-copy metadata adjust breaks SKBs on XDP_PASS > igc: enable XDP metadata in driver > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > -- Thanks, Al
On 29/11/2021 15.10, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> > Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:36:20 +0100 > >> Changes to fix and enable XDP metadata to a specific Intel driver igc. >> Tested with hardware i225 that uses driver igc, while testing AF_XDP >> access to metadata area. > > Would you mind if I take this your series into my bigger one that > takes care of it throughout all the Intel drivers? I have a customer that depend on this fix. They will have to do the backport anyway (to v5.13), but it would bring confidence on their side if the commits appear in an official git-tree before doing the backport (and optimally with a SHA they can refer to). Tony Nguyen have these landed in your git-tree? --JEsper
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:29:07 +0100 > On 29/11/2021 15.10, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> > > Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:36:20 +0100 > > > >> Changes to fix and enable XDP metadata to a specific Intel driver igc. > >> Tested with hardware i225 that uses driver igc, while testing AF_XDP > >> access to metadata area. > > > > Would you mind if I take this your series into my bigger one that > > takes care of it throughout all the Intel drivers? > > I have a customer that depend on this fix. They will have to do the > backport anyway (to v5.13), but it would bring confidence on their side > if the commits appear in an official git-tree before doing the backport > (and optimally with a SHA they can refer to). Yeah, sure, it's totally fine to get them accepted separately, I'll just refer to them in my series. > Tony Nguyen have these landed in your git-tree? Doesn't seem like. The reason might be that you responded to my patch 2/2 comments only now. > --JEsper Al