Message ID | 20211204215820.17378-8-semen.protsenko@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | i2c: exynos5: Add support for modern Exynos SoCs | expand |
On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 23:58:19 +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote: > In Device Tree specification it's recommended to use "i2c" name for I2C > nodes. Now that i2c-exynos5 dt-schema binding was added, it shows some > warnings like this when validating HS-I2C nodes: > > hsi2c@xxxxxxxxx: $nodename:0: 'hsi2c@xxxxxxxx' does not match > '^i2c(@.*)?' > From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-exynos5.yaml > > [...] Applied, thanks! [7/8] arm: dts: exynos: Rename hsi2c nodes to i2c for Exynos5260 commit: 29bf0ff5ae18ad1a6dd183569cc097e578052c57 Best regards,
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 11:58:19PM +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote: > In Device Tree specification it's recommended to use "i2c" name for I2C > nodes. Now that i2c-exynos5 dt-schema binding was added, it shows some > warnings like this when validating HS-I2C nodes: > > hsi2c@xxxxxxxxx: $nodename:0: 'hsi2c@xxxxxxxx' does not match > '^i2c(@.*)?' > From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-exynos5.yaml > > Rename hsi2c@* to i2c@* to fix those warnings. > > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> Applied to for-next, thanks!
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 16:49, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 11:58:19PM +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote: > > In Device Tree specification it's recommended to use "i2c" name for I2C > > nodes. Now that i2c-exynos5 dt-schema binding was added, it shows some > > warnings like this when validating HS-I2C nodes: > > > > hsi2c@xxxxxxxxx: $nodename:0: 'hsi2c@xxxxxxxx' does not match > > '^i2c(@.*)?' > > From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-exynos5.yaml > > > > Rename hsi2c@* to i2c@* to fix those warnings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> > > Applied to for-next, thanks! > Just a heads up: Krzysztof has already taken patches #7 and #8 to his tree: [1]. Other than that, thanks a lot for handling this series! [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=for-next
On 09/12/2021 15:48, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 11:58:19PM +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote: >> In Device Tree specification it's recommended to use "i2c" name for I2C >> nodes. Now that i2c-exynos5 dt-schema binding was added, it shows some >> warnings like this when validating HS-I2C nodes: >> >> hsi2c@xxxxxxxxx: $nodename:0: 'hsi2c@xxxxxxxx' does not match >> '^i2c(@.*)?' >> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-exynos5.yaml >> >> Rename hsi2c@* to i2c@* to fix those warnings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> > > Applied to for-next, thanks! I applied the DTS patches, because they should go via arm-soc tree. Please drop them from I2C. Best regards, Krzysztof
> > Applied to for-next, thanks! > > I applied the DTS patches, because they should go via arm-soc tree. > Please drop them from I2C. Sure thing! I replied to the wrong mail, I am sorry for the noise. I didn't apply patch 7 but 6.
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi index 52fa211525ce..524d244050e0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ mmc_2: mmc@12160000 { status = "disabled"; }; - hsi2c_0: hsi2c@12da0000 { + hsi2c_0: i2c@12da0000 { compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-hsi2c"; reg = <0x12DA0000 0x1000>; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 108 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ hsi2c_0: hsi2c@12da0000 { status = "disabled"; }; - hsi2c_1: hsi2c@12db0000 { + hsi2c_1: i2c@12db0000 { compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-hsi2c"; reg = <0x12DB0000 0x1000>; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 109 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ hsi2c_1: hsi2c@12db0000 { status = "disabled"; }; - hsi2c_2: hsi2c@12dc0000 { + hsi2c_2: i2c@12dc0000 { compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-hsi2c"; reg = <0x12DC0000 0x1000>; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 110 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ hsi2c_2: hsi2c@12dc0000 { status = "disabled"; }; - hsi2c_3: hsi2c@12dd0000 { + hsi2c_3: i2c@12dd0000 { compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-hsi2c"; reg = <0x12DD0000 0x1000>; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 111 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
In Device Tree specification it's recommended to use "i2c" name for I2C nodes. Now that i2c-exynos5 dt-schema binding was added, it shows some warnings like this when validating HS-I2C nodes: hsi2c@xxxxxxxxx: $nodename:0: 'hsi2c@xxxxxxxx' does not match '^i2c(@.*)?' From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-exynos5.yaml Rename hsi2c@* to i2c@* to fix those warnings. Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> --- Changes in v2: - This patch was added in v2 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)