diff mbox series

[v3,-next] block/wbt: fix negative inflight counter when remove scsi device

Message ID 20211214133103.551813-1-qiulaibin@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v3,-next] block/wbt: fix negative inflight counter when remove scsi device | expand

Commit Message

QiuLaibin Dec. 14, 2021, 1:31 p.m. UTC
Now that we disable wbt by set WBT_STATE_OFF_DEFAULT in
wbt_disable_default() when switch elevator to bfq. And when
we remove scsi device, wbt will be enabled by wbt_enable_default.
If it become false positive between wbt_wait() and wbt_track()
when submit write request.

The following is the scenario that triggered the problem.

T1                          T2                           T3
                            elevator_switch_mq
                            bfq_init_queue
                            wbt_disable_default <= Set
                            rwb->enable_state (OFF)
Submit_bio
blk_mq_make_request
rq_qos_throttle
<= rwb->enable_state (OFF)
                                                         scsi_remove_device
                                                         sd_remove
                                                         del_gendisk
                                                         blk_unregister_queue
                                                         elv_unregister_queue
                                                         wbt_enable_default
                                                         <= Set rwb->enable_state (ON)
q_qos_track
<= rwb->enable_state (ON)
^^^^^^ this request will mark WBT_TRACKED without inflight add and will
lead to drop rqw->inflight to -1 in wbt_done() which will trigger IO hung.

Fix this by move wbt_enable_default() from elv_unregister to
bfq_exit_queue(). Only re-enable wbt when bfq exit.
Fixes: 76a8040817b4b ("blk-wbt: make sure throttle is enabled properly")
Signed-off-by: Laibin Qiu <qiulaibin@huawei.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 4 ++++
 block/elevator.c    | 2 --
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Christoph Hellwig Dec. 14, 2021, 3:04 p.m. UTC | #1
Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Ming Lei Dec. 15, 2021, 2:42 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:31:03PM +0800, Laibin Qiu wrote:
> Now that we disable wbt by set WBT_STATE_OFF_DEFAULT in
> wbt_disable_default() when switch elevator to bfq. And when
> we remove scsi device, wbt will be enabled by wbt_enable_default.
> If it become false positive between wbt_wait() and wbt_track()
> when submit write request.
> 
> The following is the scenario that triggered the problem.
> 
> T1                          T2                           T3
>                             elevator_switch_mq
>                             bfq_init_queue
>                             wbt_disable_default <= Set
>                             rwb->enable_state (OFF)
> Submit_bio
> blk_mq_make_request
> rq_qos_throttle
> <= rwb->enable_state (OFF)
>                                                          scsi_remove_device
>                                                          sd_remove
>                                                          del_gendisk
>                                                          blk_unregister_queue
>                                                          elv_unregister_queue
>                                                          wbt_enable_default
>                                                          <= Set rwb->enable_state (ON)
> q_qos_track
> <= rwb->enable_state (ON)
> ^^^^^^ this request will mark WBT_TRACKED without inflight add and will
> lead to drop rqw->inflight to -1 in wbt_done() which will trigger IO hung.
> 
> Fix this by move wbt_enable_default() from elv_unregister to
> bfq_exit_queue(). Only re-enable wbt when bfq exit.
> Fixes: 76a8040817b4b ("blk-wbt: make sure throttle is enabled properly")
> Signed-off-by: Laibin Qiu <qiulaibin@huawei.com>
> ---
>  block/bfq-iosched.c | 4 ++++
>  block/elevator.c    | 2 --
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index 0c612a911696..8b7524450835 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -6996,6 +6996,7 @@ static void bfq_exit_queue(struct elevator_queue *e)
>  {
>  	struct bfq_data *bfqd = e->elevator_data;
>  	struct bfq_queue *bfqq, *n;
> +	struct request_queue *q = bfqd->queue;
>  
>  	hrtimer_cancel(&bfqd->idle_slice_timer);
>  
> @@ -7019,6 +7020,9 @@ static void bfq_exit_queue(struct elevator_queue *e)
>  #endif
>  
>  	kfree(bfqd);
> +
> +	/* Re-enable throttling in case elevator disabled it */

Of course, bfq has disabled it, so the above comment is useless,
otherwise looks fine:

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@rehdat.com>


Thanks,
Ming
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 0c612a911696..8b7524450835 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -6996,6 +6996,7 @@  static void bfq_exit_queue(struct elevator_queue *e)
 {
 	struct bfq_data *bfqd = e->elevator_data;
 	struct bfq_queue *bfqq, *n;
+	struct request_queue *q = bfqd->queue;
 
 	hrtimer_cancel(&bfqd->idle_slice_timer);
 
@@ -7019,6 +7020,9 @@  static void bfq_exit_queue(struct elevator_queue *e)
 #endif
 
 	kfree(bfqd);
+
+	/* Re-enable throttling in case elevator disabled it */
+	wbt_enable_default(q);
 }
 
 static void bfq_init_root_group(struct bfq_group *root_group,
diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
index ec98aed39c4f..482df2a350fc 100644
--- a/block/elevator.c
+++ b/block/elevator.c
@@ -525,8 +525,6 @@  void elv_unregister_queue(struct request_queue *q)
 		kobject_del(&e->kobj);
 
 		e->registered = 0;
-		/* Re-enable throttling in case elevator disabled it */
-		wbt_enable_default(q);
 	}
 }