Message ID | 20211213085710.28962-1-mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | memblock, arm: fixes for freeing of the memory map | expand |
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 04:57:05PM +0800, Mark-PK Tsai wrote: > When linux memory is not aligned with page block size and have hole in zone, > the 5.4-lts arm kernel might crash in move_freepages() as Kefen Wang reported in [1]. > Backport the upstream fix commits by Mike Rapoport [2] to 5.4 can fix this issue. > > And free_unused_memmap() of arm and arm64 are moved to generic mm/memblock in > the below upstream commit, so I applied the first two patches to free_unused_memmap() > in arch/arm/mm/init.c. > > (4f5b0c178996 arm, arm64: move free_unused_memmap() to generic mm) > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2a1592ad-bc9d-4664-fd19-f7448a37edc0@huawei.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210630071211.21011-1-rppt@kernel.org/#t > > Mike Rapoport (5): > memblock: free_unused_memmap: use pageblock units instead of MAX_ORDER > memblock: align freed memory map on pageblock boundaries with > SPARSEMEM > memblock: ensure there is no overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() > arm: extend pfn_valid to take into account freed memory map alignment > arm: ioremap: don't abuse pfn_valid() to check if pfn is in RAM > > arch/arm/mm/init.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c | 4 +++- > mm/memblock.c | 3 ++- > 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.18.0 > These look like they also are required in 5.10.y as well, right? Please also provide a backported series for that tree, we can not have users moving to a newer kernel version and having regressions. I can't take this series until then, sorry. thanks, greg k-h
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:07:40AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 04:57:05PM +0800, Mark-PK Tsai wrote: > > When linux memory is not aligned with page block size and have hole in zone, > > the 5.4-lts arm kernel might crash in move_freepages() as Kefen Wang reported in [1]. > > Backport the upstream fix commits by Mike Rapoport [2] to 5.4 can fix this issue. > > > > And free_unused_memmap() of arm and arm64 are moved to generic mm/memblock in > > the below upstream commit, so I applied the first two patches to free_unused_memmap() > > in arch/arm/mm/init.c. > > > > (4f5b0c178996 arm, arm64: move free_unused_memmap() to generic mm) > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2a1592ad-bc9d-4664-fd19-f7448a37edc0@huawei.com/ > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210630071211.21011-1-rppt@kernel.org/#t > > > > Mike Rapoport (5): > > memblock: free_unused_memmap: use pageblock units instead of MAX_ORDER > > memblock: align freed memory map on pageblock boundaries with > > SPARSEMEM > > memblock: ensure there is no overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() > > arm: extend pfn_valid to take into account freed memory map alignment > > arm: ioremap: don't abuse pfn_valid() to check if pfn is in RAM > > > > arch/arm/mm/init.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > > arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c | 4 +++- > > mm/memblock.c | 3 ++- > > 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.18.0 > > > > These look like they also are required in 5.10.y as well, right? Please > also provide a backported series for that tree, we can not have users > moving to a newer kernel version and having regressions. > > I can't take this series until then, sorry. Ah, now I see your 5.10 series, thanks. I'll go queue both of these series up now, thanks for the backports. greg k-h