linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

Commit Message

Stephen Rothwell Jan. 10, 2022, 2:16 a.m. UTC

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:

  arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c

between commits:

  b9f5621c9547 ("perf/core: Rework guest callbacks to prepare for static_call support")
  73cd107b9685 ("KVM: x86: Drop current_vcpu for kvm_running_vcpu + kvm_arch_vcpu variable")

from the tip tree and commit:

  40ccb96d5483 ("KVM: x86/pmu: Add pmc->intr to refactor kvm_perf_overflow{_intr}()")

from the kvm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

Comments

Like Xu Jan. 10, 2022, 2:28 a.m. UTC | #1

On 10/1/2022 10:16 am, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>    arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>    b9f5621c9547 ("perf/core: Rework guest callbacks to prepare for static_call support")
>    73cd107b9685 ("KVM: x86: Drop current_vcpu for kvm_running_vcpu + kvm_arch_vcpu variable")
> 
> from the tip tree and commit:
> 
>    40ccb96d5483 ("KVM: x86/pmu: Add pmc->intr to refactor kvm_perf_overflow{_intr}()")
> 
> from the kvm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

The fix looks good to me. Thank you and please move on.

Patch

diff --cc arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 0c2133eb4cf6,8abdadb7e22a..000000000000
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c